PDA

View Full Version : 5U4 vs 5AR4/GZ34


slhguitar
02-27-2006, 12:22 AM
Are these comparable, and close enough in voltages that a Bias for 5881/6L6s would not be necissary? Its for a fixed-bias mesa dual rectifier. Any thoughts on which sounds/feels better?

phsyconoodler
02-27-2006, 04:40 AM
If you bias with the 5AR4,you can sub in the 5U4 and not worry.The 5U4 has more sag and can be spongier feeling.6L6's are biased quite a bit different that 5881's,so a rebias will probably be necessary.

Swarty
02-27-2006, 08:56 AM
5AR4 = about 20V over a 5U4.

slhguitar
02-27-2006, 10:18 AM
That there is the problem. I'm fairly new to the whole amp tech world (only a few months in), and my amp is fixed-bias, with no pot for bias adjustment. What I suppose I was trying to get at is, would 5AR4s run a voltage that is within the safe range for regular Sovtek 5881s? If not, I have no problem with using 5U4s, I have simply heard good things about GZ34s in Mesa Rectifiers. Thanks.

Shea
02-27-2006, 10:48 AM
Those Sovtek 5881s can take rather high plate voltages, so I would't worry about that aspect. But I would check the biasing, because the increase in plate voltage is going to change the power dissipation at idle.

IMO Sovtek 5881s sound better when biased a bit on the hot side, so it might turn out that you don't have to change anything in the bias circuit. But I would still check it.

Shea

donnyjaguar
02-27-2006, 11:34 AM
If your amplifier is designed for GZ34 you shouldn't have any problem running 5U4G tubes. The difference between these two tubes, IIRC, is the GZ uses an indirectly heated cathode whereas the 5U4 uses a directly heated. That said, the HT out of the GZ34 can be on only pin 8, but it could be on pin 2 of a 5U4G amplifier. The power-up time of a 5U4 is much shorter than a GZ34 tube. Some will argue this is a bad thing, and I'll go along with that for the most part. The difference between the two times is probably as a result of the direct vs indirect heating of the cathode. The GZ34 is generally accepted as the best vacuum tube rectifier made.

DJ

Shea
02-27-2006, 01:37 PM
The GZ34 is generally accepted as the best vacuum tube rectifier made.

DJ

Yeah, it seems to be the most sought after, but I think amps of 50 watts and below sound a little sweeter with a 5U4. I can't hear any difference between a GZ34 and a solid-state rectifier in those amps.

Shea

brad347
02-27-2006, 01:52 PM
i dont know the mullard 5AR4 I have in my Deluxe sure sounds sweet. It had a Sovtek/Groove Trash in there and I'm amazed at the difference in sound just between the two brands. I sure wasn't expecting it...

I think 5U4s can sound "mushy" in lots of amps... I had one in a pro reverb and the amp totally opened up once I put the 5AR4 in.

Swarty
02-27-2006, 04:05 PM
If your amplifier is designed for GZ34 you shouldn't have any problem running 5U4G tubes.

Not true. A 5U4 draws substantially more fillament current than a 5AR4 and thus could smoke a power trans in an amp designed for 5AR4s (although one would hope the manufacturer would over spec the trans to accomodate either tube). I certainly would not advise putting a 5U4 in vintage amps (BF, Tweed, Marshall) that call for a 5AR4.

Blue Strat
02-28-2006, 07:48 AM
Since the question was about changing from a 5U4 to a 5AR4, often this is ok especially in Mesas which tend to be biased cold.

On the other hand, not knowing how the 5881s in the amp are biased now ( I don't know the history of the amp/tubes), it's impossible to draw any conclusions about this particular setup.

The only way to know is to get a bias probe, or similar, and run a test with the new rectifier. The Russian 5881s (which are neither 5881s or 6L6s, just similar) will handle the voltage increase, but possibly not the resulting change in bias that the switch from a 5U4 to 5AR4 will provide.

donnyjaguar
02-28-2006, 10:12 AM
A 5U4 draws substantially more fillament current than a 5AR4
Ah! That is correct. The 1.1A of additional current would tax the transformer to the tune of 5.5Watts. I suspect most filament windings could tolerate this additional current, but I'm guessing the added demands on the transformer core would lower the HT a little more. This added to the higher inherent voltage drop could explain the softening up of the amplifier.

I have done swaps between these two without issues, but I agree that's not to say it would be wise to do on all amplifiers. On the Donny Jaguar amplifier the transformer came from equipment that used a 5U4 anyway so my GZ34 should be fine.

DJ

slhguitar
02-28-2006, 10:38 AM
Where can I find a bias probe? Is it essentially just a multi-meter that people use to check bias?

Blue Strat
02-28-2006, 04:08 PM
Where can I find a bias probe? Is it essentially just a multi-meter that people use to check bias?

Check the Bias Rite at www.tedweber.com (http://www.tedweber.com)

You CAN measure bias with just a multimeter, but it's not always easy knowing where to connect it, and there's potential danger to you, the meter and/or the meters fuse.

Using a bias probe removes all the danger and guess work. I've biased amps in every concievable way and now use a bias probe only.

phsyconoodler
03-03-2006, 07:50 PM
Yes,the 5U4 draws more filament current.You need to be wary when using it in place of the 5AR4,but many amps including Fenders used the same power transfomers for both tubes.You need to know what transformer you have in your amp and then you will be able to determine the filament current rating.You may find that a large resistor in the B+ line will give you the 'sag' you are probably seeking.It also creates heat,so it needs to be in a place that won't cause grief for other components.
I guess the real issue here is why you want to change and why people think there's some magic in a simple rectifier tube that converts AC to DC.It's the actual voltage that's the key here.One guy talked about how much better his amp sounded with the Mullard rectifier tube vs the sovtek one.The resulting voltage is the key to that 'improvement',not the change in brands.Both are capable of performing admirably.The bias in that particular amp is probably the key to the percieved 'performance' change and not the tube itself.
Also,popping a different rectifier tube into an amp without being aware of the changes in voltage to the whole amp is not advised.That means you have to be able to check the bias and see what is happening in there before you forge ahead.some amps there is no probalem at all and others can cause you grief.As the original question seemed like he wanted to put in a 5U4 in place of the 5AR4,it was not really an issue.He also did not say what amp he wanted to do this on.I retract my statement saying it's OK to do this.We need more info before making a judgement on it.

brad347
03-03-2006, 08:35 PM
I'm the guy who noticed the improvement in tone with the Mullard 5AR4 over the Sovtek. I can't explain it and I too was surprised... for the record I re-biased the amp to the proper bias point with each tube.

Can I ask your opinion about power transformers? Do you think that two different power transformers can sound different all else being equal?

billdurham
03-03-2006, 09:02 PM
You didn't ask me, but I would like to respond. The "sound" of the power tranformer, from a technical standpoint is an apples and oranges question. When you think about the AC voltages that the power transformer provides...the high voltage for the tube plates gets rectified into DC and is AC isolated from the audio side of things by the choke. I don't think that a power tranformer has a "sound". It can definetly effect the sound of an amp if it is unable to provide enough current to the amplifier, but as far as having a sound..the only sound it has is a pretty ugly 60hz.

phsyconoodler
03-03-2006, 10:18 PM
The only way you could notice an improvement in sound by changing a rectifier tube is if the old one was on it's way out.Or if the final rectified voltage is different than the original tube.A rectifier tube ONLY converts AC to pulsing DC voltage.Nothing more and nothing less.
Billduram amswered the question about the power transformer.
The phenomenon of IMPROVED sound you are hearing is an direct relation to what the voltage was before and after the tube change.Yes,a mullard is more durable and much,much better tube than the Sovtek is.
So if the voltage is less,then your amp likes to be there.If it's more,the same applies.The resultant voltage does more than change the power tube bias,it also raises or lowers the preamp side too.That can be good or bad.In your case it's good from a sonic point of view.

brad347
03-03-2006, 11:01 PM
cool. Thanks for the reply.

VintageJon
03-04-2006, 12:05 AM
The level of DCV a 5AR4/GZ34 provides is bit higher than a 5U4, and this effects the output stage as having slighly more head room. The same applies to pre-amp stages as we are talking about B+ here.

It 's not apparent right off the bat, depending on your ears, but it will make a diffference in tube life and sublte tone.

-Jon

VaughnC
03-04-2006, 12:53 AM
Another word of caution....I replaced a 5U4 in one of my amps with a 5AR4 and it increased the high voltage on my first 450 volt rated filter cap from 435 volts to 465 volts. Safe, maybe....but I didn't want to risk it with Chinese caps.

Blue Strat
03-04-2006, 08:35 AM
I'm the guy who noticed the improvement in tone with the Mullard 5AR4 over the Sovtek. I can't explain it and I too was surprised... for the record I re-biased the amp to the proper bias point with each tube.

Can I ask your opinion about power transformers? Do you think that two different power transformers can sound different all else being equal?

Power transformers can definitely sound different if the DC voltages they produce are different. Also, the internal resistance of the tranny windings can affect sag which can be noticable.

This concept of "it only affects the power supply, therefore it can't affect tone" is BS. Everything affects tone to some degree.

fullerplast
03-04-2006, 08:46 AM
Power transformers can definitely sound different if the DC voltages they produce are different. Also, the internal resistance of the tranny windings can affect sag which can be noticable.

This concept of "it only affects the power supply, therefore it can't affect tone" is BS. Everything affects tone to some degree.

Exactly.

There are two major states to consider; the steady state DC voltages, and the dynamic response. The steady state is easy to measure and compare. The dynamic response to large and instantaneous demands for current is much more difficult but is very significant. It gives the amp it's touch sensitivity.

So while the power tranny and rectifier (and filter caps) are not in the signal path, they still affect the response of the amp, particularily at high volume. You may never even hear any difference at low to moderate volumes, it's only when current demand is exceeding the ability of the tranny, rectifier, and caps to respond instantaneously to those demands that you will hear and feel a difference.

TheAmpNerd
03-04-2006, 08:53 AM
This concept of "it only affects the power supply, therefore it can't affect tone" is BS. Everything affects tone to some degree.

Ahhh, the power supply! Near and dear to my heart. Probably the
most over looked aspect of most amps. Not glorious by any means

HOWEVER

it IS the foundation of tone.

brad347
03-04-2006, 09:22 AM
thanks mike, ampnerd, et al... just as I always suspected re: power supply and response/tone.

phsyconoodler
03-04-2006, 09:51 AM
Just to be more accurate,the power transformer does not make DC voltage.It makes AC voltage at a higher level.Hence the name transformer.The rectifier converts it to DC voltage.
As I said before,it's only a voltage/current relationship to the rest of the amp.The real TONE comes from the circuit.It's the symbiotic relationship of all the components together that makes sweet music.That includes you the player.

Blue Strat
03-04-2006, 01:55 PM
Just to be more accurate,the power transformer does not make DC voltage.It makes AC voltage at a higher level.Hence the name transformer.The rectifier converts it to DC voltage.
.

Yes, I meant the final resulting DC voltage NUMBER which has everything to do with the PT turns ratios, internal resistance, etc.

billdurham
03-04-2006, 02:18 PM
Blue Strat.... Physconoodler answered before I did, PT's only produce AC. I think that you are using "subjective" electronics to explain your position..instead of things like Ohms Law. The turns ratio of the PT determines what the AC voltage will be on the secondary of the transformer...period. The gauge of the wire and the thickness of the core metal will determine how much current the secondary will produce....period. If the tubes don't get the right voltages, then the amp will sound bad...period. There is no magic here, its all math and physics. Having said that, the only magical part of the equatioin is the selecton of component values in the design of the amp. Leo and Jim created the magic with their designs.

BD

Blue Strat
03-04-2006, 03:56 PM
Blue Strat.... Physconoodler answered before I did, PT's only produce AC. I think that you are using "subjective" electronics to explain your position..instead of things like Ohms Law. The turns ratio of the PT determines what the AC voltage will be on the secondary of the transformer...period. The gauge of the wire and the thickness of the core metal will determine how much current the secondary will produce....period. If the tubes don't get the right voltages, then the amp will sound bad...period. There is no magic here, its all math and physics. Having said that, the only magical part of the equatioin is the selecton of component values in the design of the amp. Leo and Jim created the magic with their designs.

BD

Yes, you've misinterpretted my response. Since the question I was answering referred to "differences in tone due to power transformers", my response considered the PT as the only variable.

The turns ratio of the PT results in different AC voltages WHICH RESULT in different DC voltages (as you correctly stated) after the rectifier.

I'm familiar with the other stuff, I've got a BSEE and 30 years of experience in multiple industries.

TheAmpNerd
03-04-2006, 08:47 PM
I'm familiar with the other stuff, I've got a BSEE and 30 years of experience in multiple industries.
Yes, that's why we let Mike hang out here. : )

scottosan
03-08-2006, 04:05 PM
It is not reccomended. 5AR4/GZ34's are not supposed to have more than 60uf before the choke.

Braxtone
12-07-2008, 09:18 PM
Not true. A 5U4 draws substantially more fillament current than a 5AR4 and thus could smoke a power trans in an amp designed for 5AR4s (although one would hope the manufacturer would over spec the trans to accomodate either tube). I certainly would not advise putting a 5U4 in vintage amps (BF, Tweed, Marshall) that call for a 5AR4.

Interesting stuff. I just picked up a SF '69 Princeton NR that has the AA964 circuit. A BF in SF shell. It has a 5u4gb in the rectifier slot. Should I look into using a 5ar4/ gz34? Would I have to do anything special to make it work?

Blue Strat
12-07-2008, 09:36 PM
Interesting stuff. I just picked up a SF '69 Princeton NR that has the AA964 circuit. A BF in SF shell. It has a 5u4gb in the rectifier slot. Should I look into using a 5ar4/ gz34? Would I have to do anything special to make it work?

Nothing special, but be careful. It's not unusual to find Fenders from transitional years that have the wrong (previous) tube chart, stamped with the wrong (previous) circuit type on them, inside an amp.

In a case like yours the best advice is to check the B+ voltage with each type of rectifier. The one that produces B+ closest to ~400V is the correct one.