AU vs VST?

Discussion in 'Recording/Live Sound' started by jehza8, Oct 9, 2007.

  1. jehza8

    jehza8 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    178
    Location:
    Alabama
    I am using Ableton Live 6 on a PPC G4 1.52ghz with 1.25gb of RAM.

    I realize that I have duplicates of several plugins across multiple formats. In some cases I have AU, VST, *and* RTAS. I hope to upgrade my machine soon to a Mac Pro and work between Live and the new Logic Pro Studio...

    but I'm wondering if there are any rules of thumb between AU and VST plugins while I'm just working in Live on a PPC. Does one format use more CPU (i'm starving for processing power right now)? Is one more stable?

    Basically, right now I'm making uneducated guesses about whether to run my plugins as AU or VST, and I'd prefer to know if my choices are effecting either my ability to process or the quality of the final product...
     
  2. scottlr

    scottlr Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    22,208
    Location:
    Born & raised in Texas; stranded in Iowa
    I really don't know if one is better than the other. I know I can't use VST in Logic Express, and I know many plugs that were VST only in years past have been converted to AUs. Aren't AUs Apple's own format? If so, it might seem they'd work better on a Mac and DAW that accepts them, but that is pure speculation.
     
  3. Unburst

    Unburst Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    4,227
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    AU is OXS's native system, it's built right in, so probably more efficient.
     
  4. scottlr

    scottlr Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    22,208
    Location:
    Born & raised in Texas; stranded in Iowa
    That's what I was thinking.
     
  5. Orren

    Orren Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,118
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    In essence, all plug-in formats basically do the same things, so none are inherently better or worse than the other. The truth is, the reason for the Audio Units format was political, more than anything else:

    Steinberg, the developer of the VST format, is extremely helpful and offers complete documentation for developers on how to build VST plug-ins, but they never offered any host documentation. In other words, each application such as Live, that supports VST plug-ins, would basically have to reverse-engineer the format to determine how to host plug-ins. Steinberg did this to give their own host applications the advantage, and true to form, no other VST host offers as compatible or seamless a VST plug-in experience as Steinberg's own applications.

    So Apple developed the Audio Units format in order to develop a truly, completely "open platform." There are public, posted CoreAudio documents for both plug-in and host development. Don't confuse "open platform" with "open source"—open source means anyone can add to the code, but Audio Units are a completely Apple-owned format. However, Apple isn't keeping the hosting documentation secret, to give Logic an advantage. It's available for everyone.

    So I would say, plug-in for plug-in, you probably won't see too much difference in whatever format you use, but I would not be surprised if as time goes on, Audio Units become better supported, as more hosts support AU-only and more developers stick to AU-Mac and VST-Windows to streamline their development time.

    Orren
     
  6. jehza8

    jehza8 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    178
    Location:
    Alabama
    Extremely helpful, thank you.
     

Share This Page