Josh Smith Dual Tremelo - Very, Very Nice

Discussion in 'Effects, Pedals, Strings & Things' started by 62Tele, Dec 28, 2010.

  1. 62Tele

    62Tele Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,437
    Got one today from PGS and have to say, this is a very nice trem pedal. I never really use all the different wave forms and rhythm options out there, I'm pretty much after amp tremelo but with greater range. This one gets as fast or as slow as I will ever use, is very transparent sounding, has nothing on it I won't use and as a result is extremely fast and easy to dial in. Much like my Retro Sonic Delay, two speeds/depths are more than enough. Seems very well built, nice and compact for what it offers, and is very quiet. Looks like a keeper.

    Any other fans of this one?
     
  2. Grenville

    Grenville Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714
    Location:
    Australia
    Does anyone know if it's similar/dissimilar to the T. Jauernig Dual Rate Tremolo that T. Jauernig also designed?
     
  3. Guitarzan

    Guitarzan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,315
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Thanks guys! It is indeed similar to the dual rate just has two independent depth controls as well as the speed and overall Volume control.
     
  4. 62Tele

    62Tele Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,437
    Which is all it needs.
     
  5. Grenville

    Grenville Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714
    Location:
    Australia
    I did try out the T. Jauernig Dual Rate Tremolo a few years ago, love the idea but it seemed a little 'cold' next to my existing trem pedal.

    So... I'm interested if the circuit has been modded for the Josh Trem. The new one sounds very good in the video demos.

    Also, having had a Catalinbread Semaphore a couple of times, I don't really get on with the horizontal layout, vertical would suit me better.

    Yes, I know it wasn't made for me specifically, just my take on it. ;)
     
  6. Guitarzan

    Guitarzan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,315
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    It is a little different from the Jauernig twin rate trem.......I feel like it is more amp-like now. I'm still really happy with how it came out!
     
  7. rreiser

    rreiser Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2003
    Messages:
    1,499
    Location:
    Wi
    I am very happy with mine.
     
  8. tjauernig

    tjauernig Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    127
    To clear up the question. I designed this pedal and it is pretty much exactly the same as my original dual rate. Just added the additional circutry to put in the additional depth control Josh asked for. The JFET amplifier circuit of the pedal is exactly the same as the original Lux Trem.

    The Rockett guys had to change a few components in the LFO's of the pedal due to some LED changes. (different colors react differently in the circuit) But that being the case, the LFO's only creat the oscillation, and do not effect the tone of the JFET amp part of the pedals.The pedal functions very similar to how the bias modulating tremolo in a DR works, only with a JFET instead of tubes.
     
  9. Guitarzan

    Guitarzan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,315
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Yes sir!! Tim you are the man!!
     
  10. King Rat

    King Rat Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2010
    Messages:
    2,466
    Location:
    Land Down Under
    saw this one looks amazing, i have the flexdrive and it rockks, using a supatrem but if it died i would come a knocking
     
  11. 62Tele

    62Tele Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,437
    I did a little shootout next to two other trems that are pretty popular around here. I'd like to stay away from names since I don't want to take anything away from these other excellent designs and reputable builders. I wouldn't say that any of the three were "best", all brought something slightly different to the table.

    What the JS offered, aside from the features, was clarity. I played a tele clean and the inherent tone was unchanged with the JS. I know some folks want swampy - which in my mind can mean a slightly darker, more distorted tonality. I love that sound too in some applications. But what I want a trem to do is survive in a mix, and I've found some of the swampier stuff can disappear in a live setting. I don't mean to imply that the pedal sounds sterile - it pulls off clear and musical without sounding clinical. It actually made me realize that one of my other trem pedals was messing with my tone a bit.

    This is not a pedal for guys who want helicopter chop, wave forms, different rhythms, a lot of coloration etc. It's a great tool if you want a simple amp kind of trem, a nice range of speeds and a way to change it on the fly without spending time staring at you feet or bending over to tweak knobs. If I want my tone to be swampier, I'll roll off the tone pot on my guitar a little and maybe step on a low gainer.

    As for the size, the horizontal format really isn't as much of a real estate hog as the Supa Trem, and turned vertical, it's still easy to use and takes up only slightly more space than an MXR sized pedal. Considering the fact that it's doing the work of two trem pedals, it's pretty efficient.

    I've been through a number of trems that are iconic on this page - some were great, others didn't impress me that much, some had features that I just didn't need. For my needs, the JS is a good blend of tone, form and function.
     
  12. Grenville

    Grenville Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714
    Location:
    Australia
    Thanks so much for all the replies everyone.

    How do you go with the knobs? I always found horizontal pedals I kept knocking/accidentally turning the knobs with my feet!
     
  13. tjauernig

    tjauernig Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    127
    Thanks Josh. And you ROCK!!!!!!!! Love that new CD. MAybe I'll see you at NAMM, I just might make it this year.
     
  14. wichita

    wichita Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2002
    Messages:
    8,012
    Location:
    AUSTIN
    I'm loving mine. Its a great trem.
     
  15. Guitarzan

    Guitarzan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,315
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I hope to see you....call me when you get here!
     
  16. Guitarzan

    Guitarzan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,315
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I'm glad to know you are digging it!
     
  17. 62Tele

    62Tele Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,437
    Time to bring this back up. The more I use this one, the more I like it. Anybody else giving this one a whirl?
     
  18. WahmBoomAh

    WahmBoomAh World Crass Guitarist Silver Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,987
    Location:
    New York
    I`m confused about the waveform ... the ad print I`ve seen talks about a Brownface amp style trem ...but the builder here equates it to a DR trem . I always thought the BF trem was more on/off than the Brownface`s more irregular rise and fall (I realize were not talking about the harmonic Brown ...but the smaller Brown amos like the Deluxe and Princeton . Do we agree that the Brown feels different than the BF ?
     
  19. fahrner

    fahrner Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    Messages:
    651
    Location:
    Central Coast, Ca., USA
    The J. Rockett (Josh) dual trem is a great pedal. I'm loving mine.
     
  20. DavidE

    DavidE Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,693
    Location:
    Dublin, Ohio
    How does the blue version differ from the white? And how does the red version 2 (V2) differ from the others?
     

Share This Page