|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Whats your preference
New or old?
Im not talking about a classic 60's strat or a 59 paul but a slightly older guitar that has been broken in already. The reason I ask is i'm very light on my guitar, its taken me a good 3/4 years for it to lose that new feel. Im thinking of a few guitars but unsure if I wanna break a new one in or buy one that has seen some action. Whats your preference ? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
First off I have never been able to justify the money you lose by just walking out the door of the music store with a brand new gtr. As soon as you cross the threshhold, the value of the inst takes a serious dive.
Secondly, yes, I would just as soon have someone else put the first nicks, dents, and scratches in the thing. And if it's some design that needs "the bugs worked outta it", I would rather some other guy deals with "customer service" and not me. I read with interest how many here would not even dream of purchasing a gtr that some unknown creature has sullied or defiled previous to their ownership. That's not me. I'm usually buying something thirty or so years old anyway.
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/musicofanatic |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
New, unless I'm the one that wore it in.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
i'm not bothered either way
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|