Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Amps and Cabs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-09-2005, 11:39 AM
telewacker telewacker is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 1,465
Avatar 2x12 too boomy!

I mentioned this in the Guytron appreciation thread. At least with this amp the Avatar is too boomy and unbalanced with mid frequencies, no matter what speakers I've tried. Anyone know of a cab that will emphasize mids more and bottom less? I'm guessing something shallower front to back. Hopefully I can find something of a comparable value so I don't have to lose $$. I'm inthe Bay Area and willing to trade with someone if you're interested.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-09-2005, 11:45 AM
IPlayHamers IPlayHamers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Colesville, MD
Posts: 1,226
Re: Avatar 2x12 too boomy!

Quote:
Originally posted by telewacker
I mentioned this in the Guytron appreciation thread. At least with this amp the Avatar is too boomy and unbalanced with mid frequencies, no matter what speakers I've tried. Anyone know of a cab that will emphasize mids more and bottom less? I'm guessing something shallower front to back. Hopefully I can find something of a comparable value so I don't have to lose $$. I'm inthe Bay Area and willing to trade with someone if you're interested.
I've never had the problem you mentioned with my Avatar cabs, but I'm using very forward sounding amps (Marshall, VHT, etc.) I hear the Guytron cabs sound pretty amazing. I'd also check out Dr. Z ZBest. Blockhead cabs are great for more vintage tones.

BTW, what type(s) of music do you play? Guitars?, Efeects, etc? What sound are you going for?

Hope this helps.
__________________
Guitars: ESP Custom Shop Eclipse, Gibson Les Paul Studio, Taylor 214. Amps: Bad Cat Tone Cat Head, Fender Super Champ XD, Traynor Mark 3 1x15, Orange Crush 10, Diezel 2x12 cab. Effects: Bad Monkey, Chorus Factory, Boosta Grande, 535Q, FAB Flanger
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-09-2005, 11:50 AM
Sudsysul Sudsysul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 361
It has little panache and gets scorned here on occasion, but for Marshall type amps, a good old Marshall 1936 will do exactly what you request - control the bottom better vs. the Avatar. It's the particle board, dampens it down very well IMO. Mine is less efficient and grinds quicker than my Avatar with identical speakers, so if your amp's a 100, this could be a plus too.

They're all over the place and cheap.. just pull the 75T's they come with and stick some V30's and or H30's in there.

The Avatar definitely has a lot of bass, but I confess that I've grown to like the sound quite a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-09-2005, 11:59 AM
telewacker telewacker is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 1,465
Re: Re: Avatar 2x12 too boomy!

Quote:
Originally posted by IPlayHamers
I've never had the problem you mentioned with my Avatar cabs, but I'm using very forward sounding amps (Marshall, VHT, etc.) I hear the Guytron cabs sound pretty amazing. I'd also check out Dr. Z ZBest. Blockhead cabs are great for more vintage tones.

BTW, what type(s) of music do you play? Guitars?, Efeects, etc? What sound are you going for?

Hope this helps.
I play a Tele and my style is blues based. The Guytron tone controls are subtle... I expect with most amps you could roll off sufficient bottom to counteract the problem, but there isn't enough sweep in the Gt100s bass control.

I tried the head with a V30 in a 1x12 and had a much better mix of mids (more) and bass (less), but I'd prefer 2- 12s for better headroom.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-09-2005, 12:06 PM
Scott Peterson's Avatar
Scott Peterson Scott Peterson is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Una colmena condenados de escoria y villanía
Posts: 32,908
Contact Guy at Guytron and get his opinion. guy@guytron.com
__________________
--- Scott Peterson
Music | Band | Fitness | YouTube Channel
Guitars: Melancon | PRS | Taylor | Tyler USA Variax Live/Recording Rig: Fractal Audio Axe-FX II and MFC-101 | Mission Engineering | Atomic Amps CLR
Affiliations/Disclosures: Click here
Recent Review(s): Luxxtone El Machete 22, Tannoy VX12 & VX12HP, Matrix 1500FXBD, Atomic CLR
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-09-2005, 12:10 PM
IPlayHamers IPlayHamers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Colesville, MD
Posts: 1,226
Re: Re: Re: Avatar 2x12 too boomy!

Quote:
Originally posted by telewacker
I play a Tele and my style is blues based. The Guytron tone controls are subtle... I expect with most amps you could roll off sufficient bottom to counteract the problem, but there isn't enough sweep in the Gt100s bass control.

I tried the head with a V30 in a 1x12 and had a much better mix of mids (more) and bass (less), but I'd prefer 2- 12s for better headroom.
This may sound crazy, but I'd try a Blue and a greenback in your 212. The Blue would take care of the mids and make that Tele sound really creamy, with more chime. The Greenback would handle upper mids. You'd have to watch your voilume though so you don't blow the speakers.

Another alternative would be to go with a Greenback and a Weber Blue Dog if you needed more power handling.

Also, concider trying some Jensens. Since you play blues, they might be the ticket.
__________________
Guitars: ESP Custom Shop Eclipse, Gibson Les Paul Studio, Taylor 214. Amps: Bad Cat Tone Cat Head, Fender Super Champ XD, Traynor Mark 3 1x15, Orange Crush 10, Diezel 2x12 cab. Effects: Bad Monkey, Chorus Factory, Boosta Grande, 535Q, FAB Flanger
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-09-2005, 12:20 PM
telewacker telewacker is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 1,465
Re: Re: Re: Re: Avatar 2x12 too boomy!

Quote:
Originally posted by IPlayHamers
This may sound crazy, but I'd try a Blue and a greenback in your 212. The Blue would take care of the mids and make that Tele sound really creamy, with more chime. The Greenback would handle upper mids. You'd have to watch your voilume though so you don't blow the speakers.

Another alternative would be to go with a Greenback and a Weber Blue Dog if you needed more power handling.

Also, concider trying some Jensens. Since you play blues, they might be the ticket.
I've used a Red fang + G12h30, 2 Weber p12ns, and a V30+G12h30. The last combination sounded the best of the three, but a single V30 in a Deluxe cab sounded the most balanced, that's why I think I need a different 2x12 cab.

The amp already compresses a lot, so the Alnicos didn't work out, although I love them in my vintage Fender amps.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-09-2005, 12:31 PM
IPlayHamers IPlayHamers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Colesville, MD
Posts: 1,226
Perhaps a Guytron 212 with a V30 and a G12H-30 would do the trick?
__________________
Guitars: ESP Custom Shop Eclipse, Gibson Les Paul Studio, Taylor 214. Amps: Bad Cat Tone Cat Head, Fender Super Champ XD, Traynor Mark 3 1x15, Orange Crush 10, Diezel 2x12 cab. Effects: Bad Monkey, Chorus Factory, Boosta Grande, 535Q, FAB Flanger
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-09-2005, 12:39 PM
johnc johnc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 535
I'm thinking that you need to get the smallest, narrowest, open-back 2-12 cabinet that you can find to approach the sound of a 1-12 DR. When I say narrow, I mean "not deep" from front to back. I've found the deeper the cabinet the more bass it has.

I think if I were you I'd contact Bob Burt.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-09-2005, 12:48 PM
telewacker telewacker is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 1,465
Quote:
Originally posted by johnc
I'm thinking that you need to get the smallest, narrowest, open-back 2-12 cabinet that you can find to approach the sound of a 1-12 DR. When I say narrow, I mean "not deep" from front to back. I've found the deeper the cabinet the more bass it has.

I think if I were you I'd contact Bob Burt.

Not to suggest that the 1x12 Deluxe cab is the ultimate sound for this amp, just that it was free of the over emphasized low frequencies. But yes, I'm thinking along the lines of a smaller volume cab, or maybe two 1x12s.

I want to thank everyone for their thoughtful advice. I think the Avatar, good a cab as it is, just would work better with a different amp.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-09-2005, 01:04 PM
HeeHaw HeeHaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 4,885
I thought my 1936 was wayboomy incomparison with the Avatars I own.
__________________
Rich
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-09-2005, 01:25 PM
Sudsysul Sudsysul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 361
http://www.thegearpage.net/board/sho...717#post599717

We got into a discussion above about a 1936 vs. the Avatar, and I was surprised at the results. I posted that I found the 1936 "more compressed and more controlled." YMMV of course.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-09-2005, 01:36 PM
fullerplast fullerplast is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 6,884
I heard an Avatar 2x12 cab for the first time at the tonefest this past weekend. It had a pair of Greenbacks and was hooked up to a GDS 18W clone. The match was extremely good IMHO, one of the best 18W's I've heard. No boominess, just well balanced.

One difference was that the owner back mounted the speakers, instead of the normal front mounting that Avatar does stock. I don't know if that would have much of an effect on boominess (actually I doubt it), but you may want to try it.

Your experience is probably just a case of the amp EQ, cabinet EQ, and speaker EQ's all just being too reinforced in the low end, rather than complementary. I suspect you still may be able to find speakers that work for you (you've only scratched the surface of possibilities), but certainly another cabinet could also do the trick. You could also try a closed back on the Avatar to reduce the boominess and tighten it up.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-09-2005, 02:05 PM
Matt Gordon Matt Gordon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Georgia, USA.
Posts: 952
All 2X12's sound funny in the midrange to me, compared to a 4X12 that is. They're are either boxy, or unclear in the mids. I have to do a huge EQ adjustment from a 4X12 to a 2X12. After the EQing, everything is cool. Might try twisting those knobs a little more!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-09-2005, 02:10 PM
HeeHaw HeeHaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 4,885
I rear mounted my speakers in my avatar and cannot tell too much of a difference difference. It's an open back cab anyways, so that may have something to do with it.
__________________
Rich
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21