|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What is your DAW of choice for home recording | |||
| Protools LE |
|
20 | 9.95% |
| Cubase |
|
17 | 8.46% |
| Digital Performer |
|
6 | 2.99% |
| Logic |
|
80 | 39.80% |
| PreSonus |
|
12 | 5.97% |
| Reaper |
|
46 | 22.89% |
| Sonar |
|
20 | 9.95% |
| Voters: 201. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reaper.
__________________
|
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
My reason for using Cubase is that it just so happened that that's what I started with. At this point I'm really not interested in learning a new DAW. It's very disruptive when I want to do something, but I can't figure out how to do it.
There may be better DAWs than Cubase, but in my opinion Cubase has all the features and more than what I need as a home recording hobbyist. So really, I have no reason to learn a new DAW. |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sonar X1d Producer Expanded for me. I learned on a cheap Cakewalk product and didn't want to start all over again with a new DAW. I was a Roland guy before that. I think their all pretty good at this point anyway.
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Propellerhead's Record is what I use.
|
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This would be me, since 2004.
__________________
Forget musical talent, experience, or skill. All you need is an opinion, and a computer. |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Logic...
Logic...
Works very well with MIDI instruments as well as audio... Plus I have used it for nearly a decade, now, so reluctant to switch. Tried stints with Ableton Live and Reason, but they didn't stick - probably just me... Mine comes and goes through a Forssell MADA-2 and Crane Song Avocet. My Best, Mike
__________________
Electrics: Asher, Gibson, Thorn, Fender, Suhr, Rickenbacker Acoustic: Beneteau, Woolson, Kamaka Concert Uke Tubes & Silicon: Fractal Axe-FX II, XITS X10, Mesa Boogie Shiny Metal Boxes: Fuzzfaceless, Analogman, Skinpimp, Suhr, Diamond |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pt7.3 --> pt8 --> pt9
|
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Studio One Pro v 2.0.6 -- I've been using this for the past 2 years. I bought it and never looked back. It's easy and I was able to create a song the first day I had it. I guess that makes it not a serious DAW. Serious DAWs you should have to take classes and spend money to learn how to use and have spend more money upgrading your computer system and other studio components.
I used to use Pro Tools. I hated it. It doesn't handle virtual instruments well at all, and I use a lot of them. Every time you turn around you're clearing DAE errors for WTF reasons. It is very picky about your computer configuration -- if you use Pro Tools buy a Mac, and you'll need a Mac tower if you need the power.
__________________
Less reading. Less posting. I have too much I need to do and will be on a lot less. Technical knowledge may be shared. |
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
REASON!
|
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ableton Live.
I've tried them all but digital performer and Live its the only DAW I get 100% satisfaction. Logic is great but I lay things faster on Live, and the use and tweaking of effects is superb on live. I'm getting money to get the new PT since thats the standard but for personal use and for my band Live its the best. |
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cubase, but only because thats what I started on. I also have ProTools LE8, but for some reason I keep going back to Cubase. I'm more comfortable on it and I like the drum editor. Haven't found it's equivalent in ProTools.
Mostly I just don't want to learn anything new at this point. I'm not interested in learning all the intricate details of a DAW, I just want to record some music and be able to edit it fairly easily. Cubase works for me.
__________________
Wolfgang Standard, Edwards LP, Wolf LP, Bogner Ecstacy, Marshall 1960A, B, and 1965A cabs, Nova System effects, Avid Eleven Rack |
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's a tough poll since what you learn on and feel comfortable with tends to be your go to one regardless if it's really the "best".
I learned on Protools, but then moved to DP when I built my studio around MOTU stuff.... But then switched to Reaper when I moved my studio to a PC. Honestly they're all pretty similar (at least the high end ones), and it's all just about using it and learning the workflow. If money was no object though I'd probably stick with Protools just for the compatability aspect. That being said, I'm more than happy with Reaper.
__________________
The Anatomically Correct Erik Z - See and hear my gear at... http://www.ErikZmusic.com - Affiliations - Youtube - Kids Hearing Protection - - - - - - - - - - - The Myth of Volume Loss when Coil Splitting. . |
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've used ACID since the 1st version prior to the Sony Buy-out
I currently use ACID Pro 7 for recording and Sound Forge 10 for editing and mastering. Great stuff, no plug-in issues, a powerful and easy to use tool. |
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
One thing that confounds me is the whole idea that "pro tools is the standard" which, maybe was true 5 years ago, and for sure 10 years ago... but today? Not even close. For the most part people have figured out how to import/export projects between various DAW's without issue and its lost quite a lot of market share. I've been, and continue to be entrenched in Windows since 2005 or so. In that time I've opened and exchanged sessions on just about everything... Toolz HD on a Mac, Digital Performer, Garage Band, Live, Reaper etc. and the only one that's been a consistent headache is Sonar.
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs producer|mixer|engineer http://mooseaudio.bandcamp.com/ http://twitter.com/mooseaudiousa |
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
|
Amen to the Sonar headache.
At Dave Pensado's Mixfest event in LA, they took an informal poll (put your hands in the air), and people were pretty surprised as it appeared about half of the attendees were using Logic. Of course, no one asked about Sequoia/Samplitude, lol.
__________________
Cass Anawaty, Chief Engineer Sunbreak Music, LLC High Resolution Stereo Mastering www.sunbreakmusic.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|