The Gear Page. A Gear Discussion Website for Musicians
A Gear Discussion Website for Musicians
Become a Supporting Member

Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Effects, Pedals, Strings & Things

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2004, 05:52 PM
centaur centaur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 75
Boss TU-2 Vs Peterson Strobostomp

Hello,

I would like to know who's of this two tuner are the best and the more easy to use, with a REAL true bypass ( espicially for the Peterson )

Thanks
__________________
I like to play my Super Hard On ( Z-Vex Rules ! )
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2004, 06:01 PM
SteveK SteveK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 843
I used to have TU-2's on my pedalboards, and now have Strobostomps. True bypass, incredibly accurate, and the tempered guitar setting really sweetens the sound. HIGHLY recommended!
__________________
Lady Blue and the TRAMPS
My Gear
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2004, 06:11 PM
Unburst Unburst is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,993
The Strobstomp is better in every way, in fact it's the best portable tuner you can buy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2004, 06:31 PM
El Jimbo El Jimbo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brissie, Oz.
Posts: 567
I have found the Strobo much better at tracking and holding notes than the TU-2. It also strikes me as being a hell of a lot more sensitive and thus accurate. Despite that, I found it easier to tune with. It's also more reliable as the TU-2s I had which both went haywire on a regular basis.

The extra options like the sweetening are also excellent.

Satan only knows why so many twits at HC give the TU-2 perfect 10's...not even close.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2004, 07:50 PM
drbob1 drbob1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,758
The strobe simulation is just a better technology-much quicker to respond to changes in tuning and possible by watching the movement of adjacent bars to get accurate tuning quicker...
__________________
Bob
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2004, 08:36 PM
Johnny Raz Johnny Raz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 493
The difference is about $100 (but worth it)
__________________
- Johnny Raz Guitars: 2007 Crowdster Plus, & 2003 McInturff DRP Taurus Amps: 2007 Suhr Badger & 1998 Fishman Acoustic Performer Pro Cab: Suhr Badger 1x12 w/ 8 ohm Celestion Gold Rack: Furman Power Factor Pro R, Voodoo Lab Pedal Power 2+ (for now) Pedals: King of Tone v4, EMMA TM-1 TransMORGrifier, EMMA ReezaFRATzitz, Voodoo Lab Analog Chorus, & Peterson StroboFlip.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2004, 09:28 PM
John_M John_M is online now
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somerset, MA
Posts: 206
The Tu2 - I'd rather tune by ear. Inaccurate and inconsistent from one to another.

The Peterson is the best, but I get by with my Korg DT7 just fine.
__________________
man was not meant for safe harbors
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-08-2004, 09:46 PM
Scott Peterson's Avatar
Scott Peterson Scott Peterson is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Posts: 22,579
That's like a pea shooter vs. a .57 Magnum.

No contest.

Peterson (no relation!) made a better mousetrap. In every way.
__________________
-- Scott Peterson

The Sugar People
MySpace
My Fitness Blog - Common Sense Fitness
Guitars: Melancon, Taylor

Fractal Audio Axe-FX
Other Stuff: WCR, TonePros, Tremol-No, Peterson Strobe Tuners, V-Picks, Mission Engineering, Anthology Gear Wear
GOOD TONE IS GOOD FOR YOU.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-2004, 09:49 PM
Deaj Deaj is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kingston, WA
Posts: 3,213
The StroboStomp is easier to see in daylight, easier to use, and 30 times as accurate as the TU-2.
__________________
Suppose there's no such thing as a hypothetical situation...

Guitars: USACG, PRS, Tacoma, MusicMan, Chandler

Amps: Fuchs, Mesa, Markbass
Effects: Boss, MXR, T.A.E., Tech21

Affiliation: builder of T.A.E. effects
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-09-2004, 12:01 PM
planetal planetal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Scenic NJ
Posts: 591
I have them both.. the Strobostomp is a much better tuner, in all ways and especially during gigs. The guitar tempered setting is fast, clearly visible in all kinds of lighting and just out and out works great. If you can afford it, its the way to go if you need one for gigging purposes.

Al
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-09-2004, 12:11 PM
malabarmusic malabarmusic is offline
Gold Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,465
The TU-2 is not what I'd consider an accurate tuner.

Hit an open sixth string and tune it until the TU-2 said you've nailed down an 'E'.

Now do the same with the first string.

Now hit the 5th fret harmonic on the sixth string, followed by the open 1st string.

The two strings are not in tune!

I haven't tried the strobo, but I'd be shocked if it displayed these issues. Personally, I'm thinking of getting a tuning fork and just using my ears to stretch tune.

- DB
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-09-2004, 12:49 PM
aarondavis aarondavis is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where everything is "free"...
Posts: 4,331
If you can hear 12 overtones at the same time, you might be able to tune by ear better than you can with a Strobostomp. I have both tuners mentioned and the Peterson is significantly better. I offer a slightly different feeling on it though. Since the TU-2 is less accurate and doesn't "hear" as much info as the Strobostomp, I take longer to tune. Which makes it a more difficult tuner live, especially when you're tuning in a fast past gig. BUT, I'm rewarded with a much better tuned instrument. Maybe tonight, I’ll do a controlled experiment with both tuners in line.

Using the Buzz system and this tuner is like night and day to my old method. I promise, it's not a placebo, the Strobostomp is much better.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-09-2004, 02:09 PM
BFC BFC is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Montana
Posts: 578
Needles and blinking lights seem like a cruel joke now after switching to the Peterson Virtual Strobe technology.

And I can tune up way faster with my Strobostomp, period.
__________________
Brian Conley
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-09-2004, 03:47 PM
the_guvnor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A tuner getting this kind of hype is pretty exceptional. That's because the Strobo is, indeed, exceptional. After I saw a friend tune with it I was sold.

Even with accuracy aside it's better because you don't have to hit the string 18 times just to get the unit to track it long enough to get in tune. Once and you're done. And once you've got it locked in it will let you know... none of that bouncing around crap like all other tuners with LEDs and needles.

And if you need true bypass you'd have to buy a loop or A/B box anyway if you bought the TU-2 or other non-Strobo unit. You kinda get what you pay for in this case.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-09-2004, 03:55 PM
centaur centaur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 75
Yeah thanks for your comment !

I have order my Peterson Strobostomp this afternoon
__________________
I like to play my Super Hard On ( Z-Vex Rules ! )
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2009, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Banner Design: Chris Sileo