Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Digital & Modeling Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-25-2012, 07:58 AM
Will Chen Will Chen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 3,947
POD HD Flanger...

Alright, if you've read my HD posts, you've likely seen my slight displeasure with some of the mod effects. That experience has extended to the flangers. Now, I don't pretend to be a connoisseur, I've only owned one dedicated flange in my life (Boss) and it was a long time ago. That being said, the tone from that pedal set my expectation and it has been met by every multi-fx and VST I've had on the (rare) occasions I've needed it. I had skipped through the HD effects many times but never really sat down with the flanger and tried to dial it in. Last night I was working on a tune I need to learn for a Saturday rehearsal with a new group and I thought flanger might sound cool in the bridge. So I went through each flange and...wtf? None of them really sound like what I would expect a flanger to sound like, certainly nothing capturing the "swoosh". Any one with a similar experience?

Last edited by Will Chen; 01-25-2012 at 09:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-25-2012, 08:10 AM
longi longi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Not So Great Britain
Posts: 152
I thought they were reasonably good, I thought the Wah Wah's were the worst effect on it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-25-2012, 08:25 AM
TomWaitsForNoMan TomWaitsForNoMan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 131
Completely agree. The best I could do is tweaking with the Jet Flange ... and it's still nothing like that "Airplane" whoosh sound. They all sound more chorus-y then flange-y... I really think the script phase can sound much more authentic so I've been using that when I want that sort of "thing"
__________________
Quote:
A gentleman is someone who can play the accordion, but doesn't.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-25-2012, 08:46 AM
hour9 hour9 is offline
Silver Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 421
I agree. I've been trying to get a Van Halen "Unchained" flange sound but can't figure it out.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-25-2012, 08:47 AM
stratchamp57 stratchamp57 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,424
Maybe you could Stick a g3 after the pod?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-25-2012, 09:11 AM
Will Chen Will Chen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 3,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by longi View Post
I thought they were reasonably good, I thought the Wah Wah's were the worst effect on it.
I can get much, much closer to the sound of my crybaby than I can get to the flange tones I have in my head and I've heard in other multis and dedicated pedals.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TomWaitsForNoMan View Post
Completely agree. The best I could do is tweaking with the Jet Flange ... and it's still nothing like that "Airplane" whoosh sound. They all sound more chorus-y then flange-y... I really think the script phase can sound much more authentic so I've been using that when I want that sort of "thing"
Yeah, I'm actually using the Script Phase for another tune and that's what I fell back to last night.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kutless999 View Post
Maybe you could Stick a g3 after the pod?
The biggest draw in using any multi-fx unit for me is to minimize the complexity of my set up. Adding the G3 only for flange, an effect I almost never use, seems like overkill. In fact, stacking multi-fx units in general isn't something I'm interested in at all.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-25-2012, 12:36 PM
Gigbag Gigbag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,344
At first I couldn't get decent flanger tones, but eventually tweaked enough to get usuable ones. It would have helped me to acually have the knobs set up the same on the models as the real analog pedals I have. Try these for starting points (note, it will vary with placement of the effects, and also try boosts in front for some):

EVH, Ain't Talk'n Bout Love (turn on for the C to B note riff):

Analog Flanger model
Speed: 0.3 to 0.32 Hz
Depth: 33%
Feedback: 98 to 100%
Manual: 50%
Mix: 100%


EVH, Unchained:

Analog Flanger model
Speed: 0.4 Hz
Depth: 82%
Feedback: 100%
Manual: 75 to 80%
Mix: 100%

or

AC Flanger model
Speed: 0.38 Hz
Width: 82%
Regen: 100%
Manual: 82%

Heart, Barracuda:

Analog Flanger model
Speed: 0.85 Hz
Depth: 16%
Feedback: 6%
Manual: 63%
Mix: 100%
__________________
"You've only got 12 notes and however you mix them up is your thing." – Ed Van Halen
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2012, 12:53 PM
DarthVanHollis DarthVanHollis is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dunedin, FL
Posts: 88
EVH's Flanger was always set exactly the same. Here's what works for me.

AC Flanger
Speed 0.10 Hz
Width 40%
Regen 40%
Manual 95-100%

There are so many knobs on a Flanger it is a tough effect to get to sound right. I think that Line 6 should just make every knob 1-100. It's stupid to have the Hz listed for speed on effects that don't normally use that paramater.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-25-2012, 02:42 PM
overunderdrive overunderdrive is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: sitting in front of a computer
Posts: 1,416
there are like 5 flangers in there, and you can't find a good tone?

user error IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-25-2012, 02:51 PM
whackystrings whackystrings is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,075
Try experimenting: Drive before and after flanging effect. Same applies to univibe and phaser effects. Van Halen stuff was all flanger then dirt ('cos of course the dirt was the amp).
If you are in doubt, just try it. Don't take my word for it!
__________________
Fender HSS Cali Strat/Gibson LP Studio-->Empress Compressor>Line 6 M9>Black Arts Black Forest>Barber Dual Discrete (LTD-SR+Super Sport)>Small Fry>EP Booster v2>Visual Sound True Tone buffer->Traynor YCS50 tube amp [Loop: Dunlop DVP-1 Vol (tuner out: Korg PB+)>Mooer Elec Lady>MXR Carbon Copy v2>Catalinbread Echorec>Strymon Timeline]
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-25-2012, 03:14 PM
Gigbag Gigbag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthVanHollis View Post
EVH's Flanger was always set exactly the same. Here's what works for me.

AC Flanger
Speed 0.10 Hz
Width 40%
Regen 40%
Manual 95-100%

There are so many knobs on a Flanger it is a tough effect to get to sound right. I think that Line 6 should just make every knob 1-100. It's stupid to have the Hz listed for speed on effects that don't normally use that paramater.
I'll give your settings a try. The ATBL and Unchained (and other EVH flangers) were pretty much the same. Unchained just has the regeneration maxed out (compared to ATBL). He does use some other extreme flanger settings/sounds at times though.
__________________
"You've only got 12 notes and however you mix them up is your thing." – Ed Van Halen
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-25-2012, 05:22 PM
Will Chen Will Chen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 3,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by overunderdrive View Post
there are like 5 flangers in there, and you can't find a good tone?

user error IMHO.
Have you done a head to head comparison? If so, go ahead and post some clips to prove your point. I'm going to try the settings posted later tonight and see if i can get something more to my expectations. I can just punch up the flangers in other units with zero adjustment and the sound as expected. If this has something to do with the pod stereo summing issue (like the analog chorus in previous releases), I'm probably just going to shelf it for a little while and use my RP500.

And BTW, not trying to get a VH sound really. But I guess his usage is the most well known.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-25-2012, 06:05 PM
overunderdrive overunderdrive is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: sitting in front of a computer
Posts: 1,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Chen View Post
Have you done a head to head comparison? If so, go ahead and post some clips to prove your point. I'm going to try the settings posted later tonight and see if i can get something more to my expectations. I can just punch up the flangers in other units with zero adjustment and the sound as expected. If this has something to do with the pod stereo summing issue (like the analog chorus in previous releases), I'm probably just going to shelf it for a little while and use my RP500.

And BTW, not trying to get a VH sound really. But I guess his usage is the most well known.
look, I'm not really a flanger guy, but I've used various flangers over the years--mainly for more chorus-type stuff--and the POD flangers, going all the way back to the MM4, sound like, well, flangers.

as always, the modeled stuff, regardless of who makes it and how good it its, is never quite as chewy and thick as the real analog gear, but it usually responds the way you would expect it to.

here's the MM4 flanger at 7:38... sounds like a flanger.

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-25-2012, 08:18 PM
Will Chen Will Chen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 3,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by overunderdrive View Post
look, I'm not really a flanger guy, but I've used various flangers over the years--mainly for more chorus-type stuff--and the POD flangers, going all the way back to the MM4, sound like, well, flangers.

as always, the modeled stuff, regardless of who makes it and how good it its, is never quite as chewy and thick as the real analog gear, but it usually responds the way you would expect it to.

here's the MM4 flanger at 7:38... sounds like a flanger.

Sure. Sounds like nice subtle flanging. The stuff in the RP can get those sounds but can also do the sweeping jet type of tone. When you try for a more in your face tone, the sweep doesn't sound smooth. Also, the tone becomes muddy vs the RP which can do some pretty extreme flanging and still sound clear. The closest is the analog flanger (thanks for the settings guys), but when you up the feedback and depth, there's a weird detune thing happening at the bottom of the sweep which just doesn't sound right to me.

Here's a clip. First HD, then RP, then G3, all into the HD using a bassman model with some delay. The HD is just about as crazy as the analog flanger will get, both the RP and G3 can get way, way crazier and over the top if dialed in as such. Maybe I'm crazy and just splitting hairs.

http://www.mediafire.com/?zr3achg1ra31x0t
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-25-2012, 08:35 PM
_pete_ _pete_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Palm Harbor, Florida
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Chen View Post

Here's a clip. First HD, then RP, then G3, all into the HD using a bassman model with some delay. The HD is just about as crazy as the analog flanger will get, both the RP and G3 can get way, way crazier and over the top if dialed in as such. Maybe I'm crazy and just splitting hairs.

http://www.mediafire.com/?zr3achg1ra31x0t
No, you are absolutely correct.
That first flanger in the clip sounds hideous.
The RP flange is far and away the best of the three in your clip. It sounds like a flanger is supposed to.
__________________
PRS guitars, Audio Technica wireless, Axe FX Ultra, EV ELX112P, VoodooLab GCP, Mission pedals

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21