Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Amps and Cabs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-05-2007, 11:12 AM
myles111 myles111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 2,990
Highest true gain production 12AX7 tube

I just completed a series of tube tests on a number of current production
12AX7 and ECC83 types.

Most conventional tube testers do not measure actual gain. They measure things such as emissions or transconductance. Unless one can also measure the plate resistance one cannot know the actual true gain.
As a side note, the VTV tube tester which has a scale marked "gain" does not measure actual gain. This scale is some sort of scale that has no actual relationship to any conventional engineering spec.

Engineering spec on a 12AX7 states that in a circuit with a TC of 1600, a DC plate current of 1.2 millamps, a plate resistance of 62.5k ohms, and 250 volts on the plates and a 2 volt bias the gain will be 100. Your TC can be lower if your plate resistance is higher and maintain gain as a side note, and visa versa.

Typical production 12AX7 tubes today show a gain on average of 75-85 with average typical gain in the low 80s.

The JJ ECC83S in this batch (over 100 tubes were tested) had gain of over 90 in most cases, and there were a number of tubes with gain of over 100 in the range of 108+


Last edited by myles111; 04-05-2007 at 12:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-05-2007, 11:17 AM
fullerplast fullerplast is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 6,884
Good stuff Myles, thanks!

Any chance you could include the other results besides the JJ's?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-05-2007, 11:38 AM
EADGBE EADGBE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,982
Are the JJ ECC83S as musical sounding as the Sovtek 12AX7LPS?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-05-2007, 11:40 AM
Roccaforte Amps Roccaforte Amps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 6,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by EADGBE View Post
Are the JJ ECC83S as musical sounding as the Sovtek 12AX7LPS?




IMO, better. BTW, I don't use SOv preamp tubes.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-05-2007, 12:11 PM
myles111 myles111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 2,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by fullerplast View Post
Good stuff Myles, thanks!

Any chance you could include the other results besides the JJ's?
I collect and archive all the tests on each factory test run from each vendor. I have many of these on my GAB website and many on the GT website in the archive section.

The reason I posted this was that I had run after run of tubes from every vendor that were so far from engineering spec that these JJs jumped out at me as the most close to proper gain spec of anything made today by 10-20% and above.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-05-2007, 12:12 PM
myles111 myles111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 2,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by EADGBE View Post
Are the JJ ECC83S as musical sounding as the Sovtek 12AX7LPS?
That is a personal taste issue.

The JJ has more of a Europe/Brit vibe and the LPS to my ears.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-05-2007, 12:31 PM
LSchefman LSchefman is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,416
Myles, what does the gain spec translate to in terms of what we hear? Volume? Breakup (distortion)?

How will they compare to vintage NOS tubes?

Also, will GT have these tubes available, and if so, how will they be labeled?

Thanks!
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." - J.Lebowski
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-05-2007, 01:25 PM
myles111 myles111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 2,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by LSchefman View Post
Myles, what does the gain spec translate to in terms of what we hear? Volume? Breakup (distortion)?

How will they compare to vintage NOS tubes?

Also, will GT have these tubes available, and if so, how will they be labeled?

Thanks!
Waht you hear is your own take on things but the bottom line is that the amp sounds closer to it's intended design.

GT has the ECC83S, always has .... and the highest gain of these are picked for the MHG kits and the gain is documented.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-05-2007, 01:29 PM
CitizenCain CitizenCain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Magdalena, NM, US
Posts: 4,440
How do the Tung-Sol reissues fare in this test?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-05-2007, 01:35 PM
Blue Strat Blue Strat is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sterling, VA (not far from Washington DC)
Posts: 21,111
Myles: It might be worth explaining that the gain of a tube has virtually nothing to do with overdrive/distortion.
__________________
Mike K
KCA NOS & NEW Production Tubes & Amp Repair/Modifications
The World's largest selection of Guitar Amp Tubes
http://www.kcanostubes.com
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-05-2007, 02:04 PM
myles111 myles111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 2,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by CitizenCain View Post
How do the Tung-Sol reissues fare in this test?
The Tung Sol reissues were not in this "test" ... this was not a test or a tube shootout ... this was a typical factory test verification.

But ... as a side note, 83-85 is the typical gain of the TSR you ask about and that is pretty typical in the industry.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-05-2007, 02:07 PM
myles111 myles111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 2,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Strat View Post
Myles: It might be worth explaining that the gain of a tube has virtually nothing to do with overdrive/distortion.

Mike ... good point but the more I say the more many get confused. But I will say a little bit here to open up the subject for others ....


The amp circuit has to do with this rather than the tube ... look at a Mesa Mark series or Soldano SLO100 compared to a Black Face Twin. Both use 12AX7s.

But ... for the amp to sound as intended in the design a tube closer to spec that is not 20% - 30% on 12AX7 spec is important to me and the folks I work with.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-05-2007, 02:07 PM
Fuchsaudio Fuchsaudio is online now
Silver Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bloomfield, New Jersey
Posts: 6,098
Mike: We must agree to disagree.

If you sum the gains of all the stages in an amp (cascaded when in overdrive mode), the total gains can change quite a bit. While an amp might not be "twice as loud" the amount and type of overload, and noise level could vary drastically depending on the tubes used.

Now I think we all do agree: All tubes will sound and respond differently in each circuit configuration and operating point, but you cannot overlook say a 4 gain stage preamp with gains of "70" in each stage to the same amp with gains of "100" in each location.

Besides the sonic signature of each tube brand, the way they will distort changes too. The JJ's in comparison to a Telefunken smooth plate would be night and day. I find the main differences to be right "on the edge" when a tube begins to distort. The waveform is seriously different from one tube to another. Top and bottom ends of the wave clip differently, and the way the wave starts to "fold" during high overdrive is quite different, depending on tubes.

The JJ's don't look right internally either, they look weird, like a 6DJ8 or something. They can be quieter than a Tung-Sol, but I'd rather listen to a Tung-Sol (if I didn't have an NOS tube on hand...lol) any day of the week.
__________________
"Andy, don't let people get under your skin about cloning anything....just tell them to read the part of the Paul Bigsby book about Leo Fender...and it won't bug you anymore one bit..." Hartley Peavey
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-05-2007, 02:16 PM
myles111 myles111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 2,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuchsaudio View Post
Mike: We must agree to disagree.

If you sum the gains of all the stages in an amp (cascaded when in overdrive mode), the total gains can change quite a bit. While an amp might not be "twice as loud" the amount and type of overload, and noise level could vary drastically depending on the tubes used.

Now I think we all do agree: All tubes will sound and respond differently in each circuit configuration and operating point, but you cannot overlook say a 4 gain stage preamp with gains of "70" in each stage to the same amp with gains of "100" in each location.

Besides the sonic signature of each tube brand, the way they will distort changes too. The JJ's in comparison to a Telefunken smooth plate would be night and day. I find the main differences to be right "on the edge" when a tube begins to distort. The waveform is seriously different from one tube to another. Top and bottom ends of the wave clip differently, and the way the wave starts to "fold" during high overdrive is quite different, depending on tubes.

The JJ's don't look right internally either, they look weird, like a 6DJ8 or something. They can be quieter than a Tung-Sol, but I'd rather listen to a Tung-Sol (if I didn't have an NOS tube on hand...lol) any day of the week.

Andy ... hello.

First off .... came to your booth at NAMM but you were quite busy so I did not bother you ... so .... here is a belated "hello".

Second ... I totally agree with you on tube construction and as a personal generality I find that generally a long plate tube such as a Telefunken or Ei long smooth plate transition into distortion in a manner I prefer, that is, a more gradual and smoother transition. Short plate tubes, again, as a generality, I find to take a dive more quickly into compression and loose articulation and definition once they are driven to their outer design envelope.

Just my own personal observation.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-05-2007, 02:16 PM
fullerplast fullerplast is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 6,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Strat View Post
Myles: It might be worth explaining that the gain of a tube has virtually nothing to do with overdrive/distortion.
Tell that to the next stage!

I know what you are saying Mike, but to the extent that the internal plate resistance and the transconductance are related to the gain of the tube, they also affect the gain of the particular stage of the amp. That, in turn will affect the magnitude of the signal at the input to the next stage, and the stage after that....so yes that does affect overdrive and distortion.

In the example Myles gave, the reason that that "ideal" gain is 100 is because the plate resistance (62K) divided by a cathode resistance of 1/transconductance (1600umhos) gives you 100. In a real tube stage, the external plate resistance and cathode resistance will alter that gain calculation, but the tubes contribution to plate and cathode resistances still are in play. The actual impact will depend more on the particular plate resistance value and transconductance values than the tube gain, which is probably what you are suggesting....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21