Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Effects, Pedals, Strings & Things

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2007, 06:34 AM
BobbyRay BobbyRay is online now
Gold Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cleveland Area
Posts: 3,900
Question Talk to me about Fuzz + Wah!

I have just recently fallen in love with the sound of fuzz thanks to a Soul-Bender and '69.

I really enjoy using a wah pedal for lots of my playing, but I've seen a couple of posts that suggest this may not work so well with Fuzz. If this turns out to be the case are there any solutions I can look into? I have a new wah on the way, a Clyde, as my Vox has been through the wringer and I was interested to try a slightly different wah that wouldn't color my original tone as much.

Will the clyde work in front of the '69 or the Soul-Bender? Or will I need to use a plain OD/Dist box when I want to use wah with dirt?

Thanks guys!

As you can tell I was never much of a pedal user for most of my playing days. I used to always be pretty much guitar-->wah-->amp. really enjoying the different shades available with pedals, and realizing that with it comes a whole new set of questions. The fun never ends.
__________________
I'm not sayin'...I'm just sayin'!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-18-2007, 06:42 AM
StompBoxBlues StompBoxBlues is online now
Silver Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: under the stars
Posts: 14,811
I've tried some solutions. Dave Fox (www.foxroxelectronics.com I think it is) sells a "Fox Wah retrofit" which is a circuit board you install to make the wah play better with a fuzz after it. I installed one on my picture wah, and it made it so the wah was as "wah" like as it is clean. The only thing, with SOME fuzzes I tend to get "quakier". The nice thing, the retrofit does allow you to adjust level when the wah is engaged, I may have it set too high, but played with adjusting it the other night and got it much nicer.

I recorded a couple of fuzzes (didn't have my '69 at the time though) like the Sunface, Fuzz Factory, and BYOC fuzz clone. Of these three they all had minimal "wah" sound before the retrofit install, but the FF was the worst...no wah at all. After the install, it sounded great. I "think" I detect a slight difference in the wah response though, but not bad, just different.

Other solutions, try the fuz in front of the wah. Some people use it this way and it is worth a try and may solve the problem.

Otherwise, I don't know of any other really good solutions, so I will check here as well and see.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-18-2007, 06:49 AM
boldaslove1977 boldaslove1977 is offline
Silver Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Posts: 3,035
my 69 only wants to work right if it's the very first thing in the chain. when i put it after the wah it all becomes a noisy mess.

the best combo i have come up with so far is...

69 -> vox wah (w/TB) -> comp -> keeley bd2 -> keeley ts808

try the 69 first... it should make a difference.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-18-2007, 12:12 PM
nashvillesteve nashvillesteve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 4,002
I recently got a RMC Wheels Of Fire wah that has the foxrox "fuzz friendly circuitry" preinstalled. Sounds great.
__________________
My MySpace music page

Is America's education system to blame for my somewhat excessive use of "..."? Who knows...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-18-2007, 12:16 PM
Laroosco! Laroosco! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,603
I told you about the Fox buffer on the phone the other day but I guess you don't want to listen to me!!

Seriously though, the wah bufffer is inexpensive and super easy to install. You should try one for sure.
__________________
www.laroosco.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-18-2007, 12:50 PM
BobbyRay BobbyRay is online now
Gold Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cleveland Area
Posts: 3,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laroosco! View Post
I told you about the Fox buffer on the phone the other day but I guess you don't want to listen to me!!

Seriously though, the wah bufffer is inexpensive and super easy to install. You should try one for sure.

Save your nonsense for other newbs you pedler of false information!

Just so no one else gets burnt...WHATEVER LAROOSCO SAYS IS A LIE!




Just kidding. Now that you mention it again I do remember you mentioning that. You really think I pay attention to you don't you? I don't be listenin' to you!
__________________
I'm not sayin'...I'm just sayin'!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-18-2007, 12:54 PM
BobbyRay BobbyRay is online now
Gold Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cleveland Area
Posts: 3,900
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by StompBoxBlues View Post
I've tried some solutions. Dave Fox (www.foxroxelectronics.com I think it is) sells a "Fox Wah retrofit" which is a circuit board you install to make the wah play better with a fuzz after it. I installed one on my picture wah, and it made it so the wah was as "wah" like as it is clean. The only thing, with SOME fuzzes I tend to get "quakier". The nice thing, the retrofit does allow you to adjust level when the wah is engaged, I may have it set too high, but played with adjusting it the other night and got it much nicer.

I recorded a couple of fuzzes (didn't have my '69 at the time though) like the Sunface, Fuzz Factory, and BYOC fuzz clone. Of these three they all had minimal "wah" sound before the retrofit install, but the FF was the worst...no wah at all. After the install, it sounded great. I "think" I detect a slight difference in the wah response though, but not bad, just different.

Other solutions, try the fuz in front of the wah. Some people use it this way and it is worth a try and may solve the problem.

Otherwise, I don't know of any other really good solutions, so I will check here as well and see.
Thanks for the link! Apparently your not the first to tell me this. LOL! I'll have to get that retro fit jobber.

Looks easy enough that I should only ruin one or two pedals before getting it right.
__________________
I'm not sayin'...I'm just sayin'!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-19-2007, 08:52 PM
BobbyRay BobbyRay is online now
Gold Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cleveland Area
Posts: 3,900
Revival from the dead..thread..er...


UPDATE!

The Foxrox Retrofit is super easy to install and works like a freakin' charm. If you've not tried one and like wah + fuzz you owe it to yourself to try one out. LOVE IT!
__________________
I'm not sayin'...I'm just sayin'!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-24-2008, 09:07 AM
Relicaster Relicaster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by boldaslove1977 View Post
my 69 only wants to work right if it's the very first thing in the chain. when i put it after the wah it all becomes a noisy mess.

the best combo i have come up with so far is...

69 -> vox wah (w/TB) -> comp -> keeley bd2 -> keeley ts808

try the 69 first... it should make a difference.

Same here...wah HAS to go first or it makes this (kinda cool) static/siren tone that I have actually on heard Live at Winterland J...makes me think Jimi used one before and after.

old vox wah
very nasty 9VNirvana fuzzface
75ish foxx tone machine
orig 808
new roland dd5 (or dan echo)
amp !

turn it up until golden brown.........
__________________
"No, it's a 1964 limited edition Thunderbird" -
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-24-2008, 09:41 AM
americananalog americananalog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Mid-West
Posts: 2,261
Just thought I'd mention: Your wah buffer circuit (Foxrox, Area51, home-made, etc.) can be fitted into its own dedicated stompbox. This way, you can use it with ANY of your wah pedals, you can switch it on and off, change the order, or leave it on all the time regardless of your wah.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-24-2008, 09:53 AM
Shiny McShine Shiny McShine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyRay View Post
I have just recently fallen in love with the sound of fuzz thanks to a Soul-Bender and '69.

I really enjoy using a wah pedal for lots of my playing, but I've seen a couple of posts that suggest this may not work so well with Fuzz. If this turns out to be the case are there any solutions I can look into? I have a new wah on the way, a Clyde, as my Vox has been through the wringer and I was interested to try a slightly different wah that wouldn't color my original tone as much.

Will the clyde work in front of the '69 or the Soul-Bender? Or will I need to use a plain OD/Dist box when I want to use wah with dirt?

Thanks guys!

As you can tell I was never much of a pedal user for most of my playing days. I used to always be pretty much guitar-->wah-->amp. really enjoying the different shades available with pedals, and realizing that with it comes a whole new set of questions. The fun never ends.
You're going to love the Clyde, it's very vocal sounding and it works with the Germanium Sunface very well. Your '69 is a similar design. Put it first in the chain. In fact, it has to be directly connected to the guitar to interact with the pickups.
__________________
Sorry, I don't explain stuff any more for free.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-24-2008, 12:33 PM
puls puls is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 335
I remember hearing something about Mr. Teese offering a retro-fit buffer (?) or some such device for his RMC wahs. Is this similar to the fox circuit? Will it perform the same function?

thnax in advance.

jwp
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-24-2008, 12:40 PM
charmboy charmboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by puls View Post
I remember hearing something about Mr. Teese offering a retro-fit buffer (?) or some such device for his RMC wahs. Is this similar to the fox circuit? Will it perform the same function?

thnax in advance.

jwp
Teese incorporates this in all of his Wah's now. I think you have to go to Foxrox to get the seperate buffer if you want to install it in your own wah.
__________________
http://www.reverbnation.com/charmboy
Great dealings with:74vibrolux, lonelylooper, readymade, ThinSkiner, worshipgzs, Rumblefish, lennon08, Jim Cobb, Demon666, secretsoundz, lakersrock
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-24-2008, 12:45 PM
puls puls is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 335
I seem to remember that Mr. Teese would retro-fit the circuit into older versions of his pedals if you sent them to him.

And is the foxrox circuit just a buffer like the teese curcuit, or is there more to it?

thanx

jwp
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-24-2008, 01:06 PM
charmboy charmboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,658
I'm not absolutely sure about this, but I think that Teese is using the Foxrox buffer, or at least the same circuit. Also, from what I hear about Teese's customer service, it wouldn't surprise me if he's doing retro-fits on older pedals. I've got a newer Picture Wah with the circuit built in and it's great before both of my fuzz faces (germanium and silicon).
__________________
http://www.reverbnation.com/charmboy
Great dealings with:74vibrolux, lonelylooper, readymade, ThinSkiner, worshipgzs, Rumblefish, lennon08, Jim Cobb, Demon666, secretsoundz, lakersrock
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21