Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > Instruments > Bass Area; The Bottom Line

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-01-2007, 11:51 AM
plmaurer plmaurer is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5
Fender Telecaster bass RI

This is a re-post from the gear section. It appears that I put it in the wrong section.


I see that Squier by Fender has introduced a modified Pbass that resembles the 72-77 Telebass.

http://www.squierguitars.com/product...tno=0326902500

Has anyone heard whether Fender has any plans to introduce an American made or Custom shop reissue of this bass? Out of curiosity, how many folks here would be interested if Fender decided to reissue this bass?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2007, 12:58 PM
tkozal tkozal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NYC & the North Fork
Posts: 1,199
Not me.....never a fan of those at all....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2007, 01:50 PM
Thor Thor is offline
Silver Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 3,206
Tele guitars - I'm a big fan.

Tele basses - not so much.

Cheers,

Edward
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Soloway View Post
Thanks guys. It's a very cool guitar but the IRS beckons and I don't think they care much about my tone.
After silence that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music.
~ Aldous Huxley
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2007, 02:20 AM
musicofanatic5 musicofanatic5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 8,216
I am a fan of the dull thud that is the 72-77 tele bass. I mostly play a 68. Would like to see one of the squiers in person ("ash veneer"?!).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-13-2007, 08:35 AM
The Golden Boy The Golden Boy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: upyerasskickinfootballs
Posts: 17,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkozal View Post
Not me.....never a fan of those at all....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Tele basses - not so much.
The pre-72 ones are pretty cool sounding- a bit hot and 'poppy' much like the old SC P basses, but much like those- the necks are a bit "more" than I care for. The post 72 ones, with the big ol' neck mudbucker- No thank you.

EDIT:
I think it would be cool to stick a rosewood boarded Jazz neck on a pre-72 Tele bass...
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Man Of The Year" Award*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris.novak View Post
If I apose anyone then they are either wrong or following blindly someone's else's wrong opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tildeslash
I work in a hospital saving lives every ****ing day. I don't need your shit and shitty attitude.

Last edited by The Golden Boy; 08-13-2007 at 08:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-13-2007, 05:29 PM
alanbass1 alanbass1 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London - Good old Blighty
Posts: 1,065
The problem is that original ones typically go for between $2k and $2.5 in good condition. A Custom Shop version would likely be priced that! Also, like others have said, this was not the best bass that Fender produced, the bick pickup sounding quite muddy and ill defined.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-15-2007, 12:37 AM
musicofanatic5 musicofanatic5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 8,216
Found and played one today at the local gtr store. The one they had was fairly light weight and well balanced. The neck is nowhere near as beefy as an original (predictably, it's a puss-neck, like a Jazz), but I was surprised at the bold flamey maple on it. I don't think it's "foto-flame", but could be wrong. I didn't plug it in, but even with the cheap, nasty-sounding round wound strings (bass like this demands med gauge flats!), it resonated pretty well. At $279, it would be a good back-up bass for any roots oriented player. Hell, I may go back tommorrow and take 'er home. Did somebody say "quite muddy and ill defined"? Hellthef*ck yes, baby! Yer talking my language now!! I'm probably not gonna get the gig in the Who, so I definately do not need to sound like that Entwhistle dude.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-15-2007, 12:40 AM
musicofanatic5 musicofanatic5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 8,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Golden Boy View Post
I think it would be cool to stick a rosewood boarded Jazz neck on a pre-72 Tele bass...
Blaspheme!!! You'll burn in hell for even considering it!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-17-2007, 09:40 PM
musicofanatic5 musicofanatic5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 8,216
May I follow up? I bought the thing and left on a four-week tour the next day. At the third gig I plugged it in and...nothing. Opened it up and the pots were the ones with the dime-size cans and the jack was flimsy. Replaced with CTS and Switchcraft respectively and was up and running again. Over the course of a coupla weeks I probably cranked two or more full turns of the truss rod to straighten the neck, and finally achieved a usable action. The neck is still somewhat bowed, and would need a plane and refret for real low action. That would cost about the purchase price of the gtr again, so, no dice. Action is medium and for me, quite playable. It's fairly light and well balanced on a strap. The sound is big and dumb; it bellows. Great in blues and o.s. r&b, but probably wouldn't win you the audition for Prince's band. Looks cool; decent sunburst and finish. Observation: In disassembling, it looks as if one could easily re-style to '68-'71 Tele Bass Specs: swap out the p.u. and p.g. with earlier "style one" p.u. (routing required) and p.g., and mount the pots on a plate. Just a thought.
Biggest improvement over the original: Four bolt neck mounting!
I wonder do they all come with this gorgeous flame-maple one piece neck? I'll try to get a photo up.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-12-2007, 01:18 PM
plmaurer plmaurer is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5
So, I contacted the Fender Custom shop and spec'd out a '72 Telebass as a one off. I was quoted about $7,000 with a "good guy" discount from my local dealer of about $5400. Here is the kicker, I would have to supply the humbucker pickup since they don't make them anymore and are not set up to make one. Further, the pickup in the Squier is not the highest of quality. Finally, the estimated time of delivery was about a year and a half. Obviously, I passed. I just picked up a vintage '73 for about $1800. Tell me, what sense does that make?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-12-2007, 04:23 PM
Thor Thor is offline
Silver Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 3,206
Quote:
Originally Posted by plmaurer View Post
So, I contacted the Fender Custom shop and spec'd out a '72 Telebass as a one off. I was quoted about $7,000 with a "good guy" discount from my local dealer of about $5400.

Tell me, what sense does that make?

That would "none".
$5K - and you supply the PUP?!? -

Good for you for scoring a vintage piece - enjoy it in good health.




Cheers,

Edward
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Soloway View Post
Thanks guys. It's a very cool guitar but the IRS beckons and I don't think they care much about my tone.
After silence that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music.
~ Aldous Huxley
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-12-2007, 06:23 PM
ghoti ghoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mill Valley, CA
Posts: 530
Just my opinion...there are a lot of nice basses you can get for that price or less.

Thing is, P-bass doesn't really do it for me. It's an OK sound I guess but no versatility and it feels like you're always just there for backup and nothing else.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-13-2007, 01:42 AM
musicofanatic5 musicofanatic5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 8,216
"Thing is, P-bass doesn't really do it for me. ...it feels like you're always just there for backup and nothing else."

Um, isn't that what the bass is supposed to do??

I would like to compare the cheapass squire with an original. The neck is probably bigger and a better p.u. on the original, but I bet the sound is comparable.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-13-2007, 02:16 AM
getbent getbent is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: °20
Posts: 3,963
I like it a lot. I'd love a fender one without having to go the sting route.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-13-2007, 12:21 PM
ghoti ghoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mill Valley, CA
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by musicofanatic5 View Post
"Thing is, P-bass doesn't really do it for me. ...it feels like you're always just there for backup and nothing else."

Um, isn't that what the bass is supposed to do??

I would like to compare the cheapass squire with an original. The neck is probably bigger and a better p.u. on the original, but I bet the sound is comparable.
Yep, backup and nothing else. Just like the guitar should chord and nothing else (no solos, that's wrong!), the drums should just play the same type of beats (no improvisation here, that's wrong!), etc...

Listen to any of the big-name bassists. Very few are playing P-style instruments. A P-style has a "chunk" that goes in a mix pretty well but I have never heard or played one that sounded like it gave me anything else.

Fender J's have a lot more ways to modify your sound, as do Ric's, Music Man's, T-birds, and others. I don't hate P's, just find them limiting for what I want to do with an instrument.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21