SG's with the smallest neck size?

[8Painting]

Anyone have any advice on this one?

[SGNick]

I think the 61 reissue has the smallest one.

[jay42]

I'm assuming you mean width at the nut. I had an early 70's Std which was less than 1 11/16". I think it was a 73. It had a volute also. I got rid of it because it was too narrow at the nut and was slowing me down.

[indytruckboy]

If you mean thin, Supreme.

[Occam]

What about those 4-string ones

[paintguy]

If you are talking about width, I'm sure the 70's models are the smallest. Like jay42 said, I have one myself and the neck width is very narrow down around the nut area.

I will be downsizing soon and this guitar will be on the block if a narrow neck width is what you desire.

[NeoConMan]

New models, 61 and Supreme are very similar.
'60's slim taper.
I think the Angus Signature may be a little smaller yet.

Older guitars, man what a crap shoot....

[8Painting]

actually i was talking about depth, not width too much, i was hoping the standards that are coming out now are thin, i can handle wide, but if its too thick like the classic, i cant play them because of my hand size.

thanks for the info

[indytruckboy]

Supreme is what you want. Standard are medium-big.

[TattooedCarrot]

Goddess
61RI
Supreme

[justonwo]

61 RI is really thin.

[kangcore]

the 61 RI neck is probably what you're looking for. the standards coming out these days have fairly huge necks - which I prefer actually. Likewise for the SG specials.

70s SG necks are fairly narrow and thin as well - you might wanna check out one of those if you can find a piece. I've had the privilege of playing a couple over the past few years - vintage guitars are really hard to come by where I live - and they have really tiny necks! But the body contours just feel so much better, I dunno whether its because they've been smoothed out after years and years of playing, or whether they were made that way.