Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Amps and Cabs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-14-2008, 07:28 AM
iluvstrats iluvstrats is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,031
350 watt 1977 Twin Reverb?

A friend of mine has a friend who is trying to sell what he says is a rare 1977 Twin Reverb that has 350 watts. I told him I don't think there is such a thing but he insists that it's true.

Is there such a thing as a 350 watt twin reverb? What would the tubes be?

Last edited by iluvstrats; 01-15-2008 at 07:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2008, 07:31 AM
Stormin Stormin is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Raleigh-wood, NC
Posts: 1,349
The only thing that comes to mind is the mid to late 70's Super Twin Reverb. IIRC, it's six 6L6's for 150 watts. These were the ones that Nugent used to use - six of them I believe.

Stormin!
__________________
Happiness is a: Gibson ES and a Boogie.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:08 AM
plexi67 plexi67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 360
alot of people mix up the rating on the back panel of an amp..its the power consumtion rating, or it may have an extension AC socket,and they put a sticker or it has a rating on the panel for this. And it may say 350 watts. This meaning you can plug things into that recepticle up to that amount.
Or the amp uses 150 watts of power.
__________________
Richie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:25 AM
John Phillips John Phillips is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 13,155
It's the power consumption, not the power output. It says it next to the fuse holder. It will also say 135W RMS under the speaker jacks, which is the output power.

Either your friend hasn't spotted that, doesn't know much about how amps are rated, or is deliberately trying to exaggerate. It's a perfectly normal, and not rare at all, 135W Ultra-Linear model Twin Reverb, made in many thousands between 1976 and 1982.
__________________
John P
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:27 AM
SW33THAND5 SW33THAND5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: D4LLA5, T3X45!
Posts: 3,261
widely regarded as one of the worst sounding amps fender produced. did he mention that?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:32 AM
openbar openbar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 978
Quote:
Originally Posted by SW33THAND5 View Post
widely regarded as one of the worst sounding amps fender produced. did he mention that?
Myth.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-14-2008, 01:05 PM
bosstone bosstone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 3,277
If there was one, its greatest benefit would be to tube suppliers and chiropractors.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-14-2008, 01:13 PM
GCDEF GCDEF is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 13,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by openbar View Post
Myth.
No, it's the truth. Horrible sounding things.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-14-2008, 01:17 PM
openbar openbar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 978
Quote:
Originally Posted by GCDEF View Post
No, it's the truth. Horrible sounding things.
Maybe the "Super Twin" doesn't sound so great, but regular Twins from that era are still an excellent amp. Big, clean sound. It's amazing how much people pooh-pooh these things, all a big fat myth. They sold thousands of them, and they are still valuable and usable.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-14-2008, 01:45 PM
GCDEF GCDEF is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 13,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by openbar View Post
Maybe the "Super Twin" doesn't sound so great, but regular Twins from that era are still an excellent amp. Big, clean sound. It's amazing how much people pooh-pooh these things, all a big fat myth. They sold thousands of them, and they are still valuable and usable.
Regular Twins probably do sound good. Super Twins, at least the one my friend had, was horrible.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-14-2008, 01:57 PM
re-animator re-animator is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York/San Diego
Posts: 8,374
why not just get a regular twin and do the 180 watt dick-dale mod??
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21