The Gear Page. A Gear Discussion Website for Musicians
A Gear Discussion Website for Musicians
Become a Supporting Member

Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Amp Technical Info

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2008, 02:52 PM
Luthierwnc Luthierwnc is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 20
Need help with reverb tank

Hi Guys;

I'm stumped on this one. I am working on an Ampeg Gemini-based reverb and can't get any signal through the tank. With a 1k sine going in I get a correct wave form all the way through the big coupling cap into the tank. Absolutely nothing is coming back in the other jack.

I have a correct Accutronics tank. When I jumped the RCA jacks the signal was a little distorted coming through the recovery phase but was otherwise fine. I got 212R between the transducer pins on both sides of the springs. With the tank plugged I get 25K resistance between the pins. The tank is new (bought it a year ago but never installed it) and I don't have another high-impedance tank to sub. The volts are in the ballpark for the 6CG7 and 12AX7. I put the tank transducers under a magnifying glass and it looks fine. No obvious breaks or shorts.

If you have any ideas how to troubleshoot a tank or some other tests I might try, please let me know. With some continuity, I hope the tank isn't dead as disco but right now that is the most obvious possibility.

Thanks, Skip
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2008, 03:01 PM
rockon1's Avatar
rockon1 rockon1 is offline
Sir Osis of Liver
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stamford CT
Posts: 8,679
What model tank? I doubt this helps but heres a link to the specs for thier tanks. Bob

http://www.accutronicsreverb.com/ioic.htm

.
__________________
"Reality is an illusion albeit a very persistant one " Albert Einstein
Was I crazy? I began to wonder, for such an appalling lack of perspective seemed near being just that.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2008, 04:05 PM
Luthierwnc Luthierwnc is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 20
Type 4. FB in and out. long delay, no lock, open face down
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2008, 04:31 PM
rockon1's Avatar
rockon1 rockon1 is offline
Sir Osis of Liver
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stamford CT
Posts: 8,679
Somebody here should be able to point you in the right direction. It measured correctly at 200 ohms on boths sides so I cant imagine why its not getting thru the tank? Bob
__________________
"Reality is an illusion albeit a very persistant one " Albert Einstein
Was I crazy? I began to wonder, for such an appalling lack of perspective seemed near being just that.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2008, 05:58 PM
mark norwine mark norwine is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: GSP135
Posts: 5,895
Here's your problem.

Inside the amp, Ampeg very wisely connected the shield on only one of the pan cables.....this to avoid ground loops. The ground connection of the unwired lead was accomplished because both jacks on the old pan were grounded.

By contrast, examine your new F pan. See that one of the RCA connectors is isolated from the pan's box. Ergo....no connection to the shieled in the amp....i.e.: incomplete circuit.

Inside your new pan, run a jumper wire from the case-grounded RCA connector to the ground ring on the other RCA connector. Reassemble the amp. Your reverb will work.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2008, 06:56 PM
rockon1's Avatar
rockon1 rockon1 is offline
Sir Osis of Liver
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stamford CT
Posts: 8,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark norwine View Post
Here's your problem.

Inside the amp, Ampeg very wisely connected the shield on only one of the pan cables.....this to avoid ground loops. The ground connection of the unwired lead was accomplished because both jacks on the old pan were grounded.

By contrast, examine your new F pan. See that one of the RCA connectors is isolated from the pan's box. Ergo....no connection to the shieled in the amp....i.e.: incomplete circuit.

Inside your new pan, run a jumper wire from the case-grounded RCA connector to the ground ring on the other RCA connector. Reassemble the amp. Your reverb will work.

Sweet! Now theres an answer!
__________________
"Reality is an illusion albeit a very persistant one " Albert Einstein
Was I crazy? I began to wonder, for such an appalling lack of perspective seemed near being just that.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2008, 05:28 AM
Luthierwnc Luthierwnc is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 20
Thanks Mark. I'll give that a try tonight (last night I was watching a little football ;-)

I recapped an Ampeg V4 about 8, 9 years ago and remember how much wire they used to keep the grounds on the star. With Fenders it is sort of ground it where you found it.

sh
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2008, 07:56 PM
Luthierwnc Luthierwnc is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 20
I got a look in the tank today and neither of the jacks are grounded -- either to the tank or each other. They are completely isolated by a phenolic spacer. Should one/both be attached to the tank frame? If so, should I lift the ground off one of the chassis jacks to avoid a loop?

Danka, Skip
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-05-2008, 06:11 AM
mark norwine mark norwine is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: GSP135
Posts: 5,895
Well, to satisfy Ampeg's internal circuit [i.e. shield not connected inside the amp on one of the leads] you'll need to connect the grounds of the RCA jacks to one another. For sure.

As for grounding the actual tank, I see no harm in doing so, and you may gain some hum protection, too. But the tank itself has nothing to do with your original problem.....that's caused by the RCA jacks not being tied together.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-05-2008, 04:10 PM
Luthierwnc Luthierwnc is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 20
That was it. I need to shield some wires but it twangs. Thanks, Skip
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-06-2008, 10:42 AM
mark norwine mark norwine is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: GSP135
Posts: 5,895
Happy to help.

About 15 years ago, I returned not one, but 2 "F type" pans to my supplier because they were "defective". I learned this one the hard way!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2009, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Banner Design: Chris Sileo