LangCasters... hot or not?

[mojocaster.com]

I say wicked hot

[snoopy1@isoc.ne]

I had two of them a while back and I just love them. I wish I could get them back.

[mojocaster.com]

I certainly am wicked attracted to the body wood... that stuff is amazing.

[ScottR]

man, the headstock is worse then a Tyler

[gearitis]

Originally Posted by ScottR

man, the headstock is worse then a Tyler

+1!

The headstock is a deal breaker for me, but I do love the bodies.

[Thwap]

Yeah, that headstock, just may be the worst looking ever.

No way for me.

[GCDEF]

I like the look of the wood. Every time I've posted pictures of them people have jumped all over how ugly they think they are though.

[mojocaster.com]

that's the point of these threads, imho... I mean, if I post a pic of a 54 Tele, who's gonna say it sucks?

I like that we have different opinions on the matter. It's what's fun.

I agree that the headstock is not my favorite design either, but I could look past it.

[PFCG]

it looks really heavy. The headstock looks terrible though.

I bet if they changed it to an inline kind of design not all whacked out like that one, they would sell significantly more guitars.

[Bryan T]

Is there a reason that the headstock looks the way it does? I mean, is it supposed to represent something and I'm just not seeing it?

Bryan

[mojocaster.com]

I think the headstock on this guitar is like Streisand's face... if you can get past the nose, the rest ain't all that bad

[daddyo]

It's art, man.

[PFCG]

it looks like a phallic symbol if you ask me.

almost a wangcaster

[KeithC]

The whole thing is just ugly enough that I love it.
Headstock and all.

[airjamie]

Im pretty sure a cuddlefish ate the headstock on that thing.