Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Amps and Cabs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:02 AM
doublee doublee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 3,838
JBL120: what makes them special?

This is an update, and a further question by the OP:

I just put a JBL D120F in a BFDR and am very surprised not to like it much, in fact the Weber 120F sounded a little better. Factors are: The Weber is well broken in, the JBL is a recone with 20 some hours on it I am told. It lacks coloration, sounds kind of flat and mid rangy, not lively. Also I a/b'd with my '65 Vibrolux with the old jensens and the Vibro sounds crisp and alive in comparison. I a/b'd both before and after putting in the JBL.

Those of you with experience with JBL's: what do you think? Needs more time? Wierd re cone job?

thanks

Last edited by doublee; 02-19-2008 at 02:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:12 AM
johnzias johnzias is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tampa Bay Area
Posts: 810
I cant explain it technically, but when matched to the right amp they seem to have more presence and touch response than any speaker I've ever used. I'm using a pair with my TR Classic Reverb. They sound better than they do in a Blackface Twin.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:15 AM
noctilux1 noctilux1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 428
jbld120

the jbl d120 makes my '66 deluxe rev sing. sometimes i use a jbl d130.
wonderful speakers. to me, they are a perfect match for any fender. they also work well with other amps i have but seem to like my fender and marshall 50, the best. also work well with dedals
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:15 AM
JubileeMan 2555 JubileeMan 2555 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 3,568
Here is some specualation on my part:

JBL, especially in the 50s/60s was a absolute premium speaker maker. I believe they were considered the absolute best. With that probably comes an intense attention to detail. Their magnets are probably chosen more carefully, the cones and wiring done with care, and the frames built to very precise specs.

With these details, the speaker will react better, sound better, and have an overall presence that no other speaker has.
__________________
Tyler
Axe-Fx II: My Patch Demos and Downloads

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-19-2008, 09:35 AM
bosstone bosstone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 3,277
They used premium parts, had a rigid cast frame, and had very tight voice coil gap clearance. They were originally designed as a theater or Hi Fi speaker, not a musical instrument speaker so they are very accurate and articulate with an extended frequency range. They are also extremely efficient at 103 dB/meter.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:00 AM
teleman1 teleman1 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AIRY ZONY
Posts: 6,070
What amazes me is how their stature fell in the home audio department from the 60's. THey were the creme de la creme then. Now, if I see JBL, I realise its low-fi.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:14 AM
bosstone bosstone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 3,277
Compare your 60's car to your 2008 car and you can understand how much the technology can improve everything. I used to be an old car buff but not I can't stand any of them.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:28 AM
JubileeMan 2555 JubileeMan 2555 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 3,568
you can't stand ANY of them?!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by bosstone View Post
Compare your 60's car to your 2008 car and you can understand how much the technology can improve everything. I used to be an old car buff but not I can't stand any of them.
__________________
Tyler
Axe-Fx II: My Patch Demos and Downloads

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:58 AM
bosstone bosstone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 3,277
Sorry, I had 2 67 442's, 69 Vette, 70 1/2 Z28 just to pick that same era. None of those cars can compare to the acceleration, cornering, braking, safety, comfort, sound system, economy, reliability, etc. of many, many new cars. Sorry. I was a hold out for many years but facts are facts. I still like the looks of many of those cars but I have moved on. Beautiful Judge BTW. I nearly bought a 68 442 W32.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:03 AM
picnic picnic is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Jersey Shore/Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 1,621
How does Weber's California stack up to the original JBL iit is cloned after?
__________________
Guitars A Tele, a Strat, a Dot and a Les Paul
Amps Mesa Lonestar Special, Vox AC15's
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:16 AM
billyguitar billyguitar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,495
For a long time I used a D120 in my '56 tweed Deluxe, with original cone and dome. Recently I put a Celestion Century ndym in it. The celestion is slightly louder with more lows and high highs. (I do not recommend that Celestion in any other amp at all!) In that amp the JBL is more honky. A while back I tried the JBL in my Evans JE150, I had been using a 1977 EVM12L. The EV had a little better lows, smoother highs and a little less honk. The JBLs are an efficient good sounding speaker. I think they are great with amps that can do blackface fenderish tones. To me a good broken in EV is slightly better to my ears but weighs a lot more! I prefer the JBLs to Altecs.
If you like the Allman Bros Live At Fillmore you're hearing Marshall heads with JBLs.
I recently bought a 1x15 Weber VST cab and loaded it with a JBL M31, I think the last generation of alnico JBL. That speaker sounds great with my DR Z amps, Maz jr, Route 66 and Stang Ray.
__________________
www.luckysoandsos.com
OMG! 77 guitars, lap steels, basses & 73 amps!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:26 AM
johnzias johnzias is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tampa Bay Area
Posts: 810
Quote:
Originally Posted by picnic View Post
How does Weber's California stack up to the original JBL iit is cloned after?

Some of the characteristics, but about 70% as loud. At least the ones I got recently. I have one from 2 yrs ago that matches up well with a D120 in my Twin.

I don't see the analogy of car technology with loudspeaker technology. Like vacuum tubes, the average vintage speakers were built better in the 1960's.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:51 AM
Bobbyoso Bobbyoso is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 176
This doesn't speak directly to JBLs instrument speakers, but to JBL's philosophy, in general, back in the day.

I still have a JBL techno brochure I got when I bought my Jubal L65 stereo speakers in 1972 or so. I still have these, by the way, and they are still my first string stereo (2-channel) speakers, having been used hard and put up wet for the past 35 years (well, at least the first 15 of those, before I discovered the joys of non-seismic music reproduction). And they still sound as good as anything I've ever heard, even super highend systems designed with 30 years of tech advances behind them.

There were a lot of astonishing things about JBL's construction in that brochure, but one thing I remember is that the wire they used was milled so as to be *square* in cross section, so that the dead space in the voice coil windings was minimized, and max gauss/volume could be applied. Pretty much going the extra yard, IMO.

Also, as has been mentioned elsewhere, the frames were cast, not stamped. Oh, and the Jubal's 12" woofers have 17+ lb. magnets driving them. Not yer basic neo speakers, baby (altho I love neo speakers, especially for guitar amps and other mobile applications).

Another couple datapoints that have impressed the hell out of me--I had and still have a set of fairly small JBL G-730 12" 2-way PA speakers I bought sometime in the late 80s or early 90s, when I was gigging several nights a week. Used 'em in about six bands or so, often as my stereo guitar rig with a Mesa Studio Pre and 50/50 rack system.

Sounded as good as anything I've ever used or heard anyone else use, and unfolded its wings like a freakin pterodactyl when the rare occasion arose to actually use all that power and bandwidth. And often, these bands would have main PA speakers way bigger than the 730s, Peavey's, Yamaha's, etc.

Invariably, when they got curious as to how the "little" 730s would sound in place of the main PA speakers, we'd hook 'em up, and they would be louder, tighter, more defined, cleaner, punchier, and more immediate. To everyone in the room. Granted, they often were more expensive than the much larger arrays, but not always. They did always sound better tho.

Oh, and the Jubals? About 15 years ago, when they were still a "young" 20 years of age, I took my family on one of our annual trips to Mexico, for two weeks. Drove down to the airport in our Ford extended-cab truck, had fun, returned home.

As soon as I pulled into the garage, I could feel something wrong, even with the 300-plus horsepower V8 still running, and my then-young kids squabbling in the back seat. This was a large house with an attached garage, and my stereo was removed from the garage, probably 45-50 or more feet away, three rooms.

I turned off the engine, and could feel the whole house shaking. Though maybe there was a minor quake, or possibly some major construction going on nearby.

I headed into the house, and it was the stereo. Apparently, we'd left it on, or one of the kids had turned it on--and way, WAY loud. And also apparently, some time in the past two weeks a ground loop had occurred, and the speakers were putting out an earsplitting, earthshaking hum, at very low frequency, I'm assuming 60 hz. It was so intense that I still remember the adrenaline rush as I approached the sonic nexus and shut the damn system down.

Anyway, I expected to have fried voice coils, torn surrounds, etc. I thought the speakers would *have to be* toast, with a 60-hz squarewave being pumped through them at ~120 db for somewhere up to two weeks' duration.

They were fine, it turns out. Physically, sonically, every way (the L65s, and I believe all JBLs in those days, had a lifetime warranty, so I brought them in, just to be sure). All that mayhem probably just broke 'em in real good. :BOUNCE I still can't believe they survived that.

Needless to say, I'm an unrepentant fan of the old JBL. Not sure they're the same company these days, but their old stuff freakin' ROCKS.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-19-2008, 12:05 PM
Tone_Terrific Tone_Terrific is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,199
EV, JBL, Altec.
Celestions were so obviously not the 'good stuff.'
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-19-2008, 12:20 PM
bosstone bosstone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 3,277
I respect, love and own or have owned; EV EVM & FORCE, Altec 417-8H, JBL D120, D120F, D130, D130F, and K120 speakers. That said, my favorite speakers are Celestions and a couple other British voiced speakers, like Weber Blue Dogs and some Scumbacks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21