Pics: Anderson Hollow T

[mojocaster.com]

More pics here:

http://mojocaster.com/photos/tagt/phpslideshow.php

[sascha]

Looks great! I'm not such a big fan of Anderson headstocks (same for Suhr), but I love the body; especially the "transparency binding" thing.

Sascha

[mojocaster.com]

Thanks

[Glowing Tubes]

You wont find a better playing guitar, sweet axe. Nice photo taking job too.

[mojocaster.com]

Thanks for the kind words. I agree that my Andersons have been some of the best playing guitars I have owned. They never disappoint!

[Pa'ani]

Congratulations on a beautiful Anderson Hollow T...

[mojocaster.com]

Thanks!

[javahut]

Nice!

I generally prefer Suhr's Ts over Anderson's, but that Anderson is very nice!!!

[mojocaster.com]

Really? May I ask why?

[javahut]

Originally Posted by mojocaster.com

Really? May I ask why?

I really don't have an answer for that. Just personal preference. They're both great guitars. If I had to answer, I'd probably say I prefer what I perceive in the Suhr Classic T as a slightly more traditional bent to go along with the modern playability accoutrements. Oh yeah... and Suhr's SSC system is one of the best things to ever happen to single coil guitars, IMHO.

But again... congrats on a great looking, and I'm sure great playing and sounding Anderson T you have there. That natural wood binding looks especially great on it. Killer!!! :AOK

[mojocaster.com]

Thanks! I agree that the SSC is a wonderful thing

[jetattblue]

Very nice looking guitar. I love the binding. And Anderson's necks are great.

[Mike Dresch]

That looks great. I'm not usually a fan of white guitars, but that guitar just looks right. Andersons are great guitars. Their fretwork and finishwork are among the best I've seen.

[mojocaster.com]

If I had kept her, I would have purchased a tortoise shell pickguard from TAG... but it wasn't meant to be I guess

[Bad Juju]

Beautiful...now I'm thinking I should have one!