Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Amps and Cabs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2008, 07:22 AM
bard2dbone bard2dbone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arlington TX
Posts: 485
Mysteriously healed bedrock BC50

I have a Bedrock BC50. When I got it, it was the perfect amp: 50 Watts, one channel sounded like an old tweed Fender, the other sounded like an AC30. Since those were my two favorite sounds right then, I was pretty thrilled.

But Bedrock smacks these things with insanely huge biasing voltages. So the tubes run REALLY hot and actually put out more wattage than the circuit should be expected to. The downside is that leads to much shorter tube life.

The last time I had it re-tubed, it soon developed a weird new hum. It was somewhere in the switching circuit, obviously because it hummed on one channel but not the other with the footswitch plugged in, but swapped to the other channel and no longer the first one with the footswitch unplugged. In summary: ugly hum, one channel at a time, which one depends on the footswitch being attached.

So I quit using it. It sat for a long time (most of this year) without even being powered up. I used my Vox Tonelab for practicing. I used an old Crate that I kept for my kids to use f they took up guitar, I played un-amlified a LOT.

Then this week I decided to take it to a new shop someone mentioned, but before I left I decided to fire it up and see how it sounds now.

The noise was gone. The amp doesn't have the tone I bought it for anymore. But it really hasn't sounded like that since the shop visit where the guy had it for almost a month before he admitted he couldn't figure out what to do with it(No schematics available) and "Oh by the way, I swapped out your power tubes."

So I don't really have my old amp back. But now I at least have a working tube amp. Maybe I can learn to like this somewhat harsher, more brittle sound. Maybe I can find an amp tech who knows what to do with Bedrock products.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2008, 07:31 AM
Tbone135 Tbone135 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,793
Well, we are in the season of miracles. I hear that the Bedrocks aren't difficult to work on, but I've had no problems with mine so I don't know.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2008, 11:55 PM
bard2dbone bard2dbone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arlington TX
Posts: 485
Which one is yours?

And at least one guy found mine really hard to work on. It's never sounded like it used to again.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-07-2008, 12:45 PM
Tbone135 Tbone135 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,793
It says "600" on it and it's 4 EL84 with a 1x12 speaker, I don't know the model number of it. I used it for church this morning and it sounded great; very Marshall-plexi-ish to me.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2008, 07:28 AM
bard2dbone bard2dbone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arlington TX
Posts: 485
A 50 Watt (Yes, 50 Watts from four EL84's, That's why I commented about insane biasing vooltages and shortened tube life.) 1X 12 in the 600 series would be a model 651.

Go look at this page and see if yours is there. http://bedrock27.tripod.com/bedrockamp/id9.html Mine is the kind of Vox-looking blonde one in one of the pics below the one that I think is like yours. The 651 in the pic is in tweed. But most of them that I saw back in the day were plain black tolex. One guy I knew had one in snakeskin and one in leopard. He was kind of odd.

Where are you? If your tech had no probs working on yours, he could probably do fine with mine.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2008, 08:31 AM
Mastervolume's Avatar
Mastervolume Mastervolume is offline
Gold Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,091
if a tech needs a schematic to work on a bedrock you have the wrong guy.
__________________
I AM AWAKE AT 4AM TO THE TERRIFYING UNDENIABLE TRUTH THAT THERE IS NOTHING I CAN DO TO STOP THE MONSTER

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2008, 09:13 AM
redfro redfro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Denton,TX
Posts: 124
Quote:
Originally Posted by bard2dbone View Post
A 50 Watt (Yes, 50 Watts from four EL84's, That's why I commented about insane biasing vooltages and shortened tube life.) 1X 12 in the 600 series would be a model 651.

Go look at this page and see if yours is there. http://bedrock27.tripod.com/bedrockamp/id9.html Mine is the kind of Vox-looking blonde one in one of the pics below the one that I think is like yours. The 651 in the pic is in tweed. But most of them that I saw back in the day were plain black tolex. One guy I knew had one in snakeskin and one in leopard. He was kind of odd.

Where are you? If your tech had no probs working on yours, he could probably do fine with mine.
I have the exact BC-50 in the pic, and I have had some problems before. My amp tech (http://www.myspace.com/dabeckcustomamps) didn't have any problems working on it without scems. He just redressed some of the leads and iso'ed some stuff to clean it up. Same sound, less noise.
__________________
Wes Pitzer
WCS Media
Amps: 1979 Marshall JMP, 1984 Marshall JCM 800, Soldano SL 2 60, 1973 Fender Pro Reverb, Orange Tiny Terror, and many more.
Guitars: '92 Gibson Les Paul, '94 Gibson Flying V, '98 Gibson Firebird, '92 MIM Fender Strat, '98 Martin D28
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09-2008, 12:02 AM
bard2dbone bard2dbone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arlington TX
Posts: 485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mastervolume View Post
if a tech needs a schematic to work on a bedrock you have the wrong guy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by redfro View Post
I have the exact BC-50 in the pic, and I have had some problems before. My amp tech (http://www.myspace.com/dabeckcustomamps) didn't have any problems working on it without scems. He just redressed some of the leads and iso'ed some stuff to clean it up. Same sound, less noise.

I'm guessing that normal issues wouldn't have been hard for him. There are only so many ways to make a basic amplifier circuit.

But if you get something really odd happening outside the audio path that is effecting things in the audio path, then you really need a schematic.

I was an electronic tech back in the day, but I never worked on amplifiers. All my experience was on radars and satellite communication gear. It's a pretty different world.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-09-2008, 07:39 AM
Mastervolume's Avatar
Mastervolume Mastervolume is offline
Gold Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by bard2dbone View Post
I'm guessing that normal issues wouldn't have been hard for him. There are only so many ways to make a basic amplifier circuit.

But if you get something really odd happening outside the audio path that is effecting things in the audio path, then you really need a schematic.

I was an electronic tech back in the day, but I never worked on amplifiers. All my experience was on radars and satellite communication gear. It's a pretty different world.
I am an EE who worked on GPS satellite development back in the 80's for Rockwell.

When I went to school they never even mentioned tubes.

If we were talking about opening up a boogie with a million switches and circuit boards or hell even a solid state fender from the 80's then I would say sure a schematic will make things much faster and easier.

But...... a vox/marhsall/fender style circuit that is point to point (like the bedrock) should be a no brainer. A good tech would have only seen similar topography many times before he ever looked at the bedrock.
__________________
I AM AWAKE AT 4AM TO THE TERRIFYING UNDENIABLE TRUTH THAT THERE IS NOTHING I CAN DO TO STOP THE MONSTER

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-10-2008, 04:01 AM
bard2dbone bard2dbone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arlington TX
Posts: 485
Well, like I said, the audio signal path probably looks basically like a million other amps. But if the problem is in the switching circuit and it's causing an apparent loading issue somewhere in the audio signal path, that's just weird. I'd want a schematic before I got too in-depth into something that odd.

This wasn't a normal problem. The guy I took it to had done fine with any number of normal problems over the years and surely would have done so again. This was a tip-your-head-over-a-little-bit-and-make-that-confused-face problem.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-13-2008, 12:16 AM
rabidears rabidears is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Eugene OR
Posts: 2
I love that amp but it has been a bit of a shop queen. Does not sound like the amp that i bought. But,,,,I will never sell it., I know someone can get it back to what it was. Been worked on by 2 techs and both had issues w/ the layout but loved it tonaly.I've had to replace 3 clean volume pots redo the 8ohm speaker out blew the original speakers the list goes on. Thanks for the link. He has a zinky, he built my first real amp back in the 80's
my first post here thanks
chris
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21