Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > Instruments > Guitars in General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-11-2008, 09:51 PM
Companyman Companyman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mile High
Posts: 223
Tail piece height question

So are there any advantages to cranking the tail piece down to the body on my Les Paul ala Duane Allman stylee ? Will it make me play more like Skydog? Please say yes because I'm sure not getting there on my own ! But seriously does anyone hear any tonal improvement from this ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-11-2008, 10:39 PM
shane88 shane88 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: oz
Posts: 6,371
ooooooooh

they say the best gibson bridge is the 1 piece wrap around a la LP junior so all those extra parts are gonna suck your tone right out - best just give the guitar to me
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-11-2008, 11:05 PM
Companyman Companyman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mile High
Posts: 223
ummm ... I have been dreamin' of owning a honey- burst Standard for 20 years or so ... I finally picked up this 1999 used about a year ago and we've really bonded ! I have stopped looking for electric guitars ... so , sorry man I can't part with it ! I'm not really a fan of the wrap-arounds either , the compensation just never seems quite right ! Nice try though ! If I had two , I'd think about giving one to ya though !:AOK
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-11-2008, 11:34 PM
Jazzydave's Avatar
Jazzydave Jazzydave is offline
Musician/Recording Artist
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 4,703
From what I understand, it keeps the guitar in tune better because the main "ending" to the string is up on the bridge instead of the tailpiece. Clapton and Skydog both did this with their Gibsons. Some claim it brings more sustain to the guitar. I think Joe Walsh does the same thing - his reasoning was that the closer the strings are to the body, the more they resonate through the top, adding sustain.

I've personally just always done it (mine is just up a little) so I don't have basis of comparison! I also wrap my strings around the tailpiece...seems to stay in tune better but I may just be crazy and like the way it looks.
__________________
"You can tell whether a person plays or not by the way he carries the instrument, whether it means something to him or not. Then the way they talk and act. If they act too hip, you know they can't play sh*t." - Miles Davis

www.daveowensmusic.com

Last edited by Jazzydave; 12-11-2008 at 11:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-11-2008, 11:41 PM
Companyman Companyman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mile High
Posts: 223
would you say it changes the string tension ?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-11-2008, 11:46 PM
Jazzydave's Avatar
Jazzydave Jazzydave is offline
Musician/Recording Artist
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 4,703
The wrapping or the moving it closer to the body? I guess in theory it is adding a tiny bit of length to the string that wouldn't normally be there but I use heavy strings (11s at least) so I don't notice any difference.

But...like I said, I've been using the same type of setup for several years now. Why not just try it and see how you like it?

P.S. Those honeyburst LPs are gorgeous. Is it a flame top?

__________________
"You can tell whether a person plays or not by the way he carries the instrument, whether it means something to him or not. Then the way they talk and act. If they act too hip, you know they can't play sh*t." - Miles Davis

www.daveowensmusic.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-11-2008, 11:51 PM
bluesjuke's Avatar
bluesjuke bluesjuke is offline
Goldtop Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gretchen's House, Bluesland, TX.
Posts: 19,564
First, you want the strings to clear the back of the bridge.
Secondly, I believe each guitar has it's own sweet spot with the tailpiece height.
There was a long discussion of this about two years ago on the LPF.

In experimenting on my Gibsons I find that spot to be off of the body.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-11-2008, 11:56 PM
Companyman Companyman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mile High
Posts: 223
I'm gonna give it a try tomorrow , we'll see . It is a plain top , I'm a little turned off by the flame and quilt tops , they just seem a bit fancy-pants for me personally . I hope this adjustment makes me play like Duane on "Must have done Somebody Wrong" on Fillmore East ! HAHAHA ...riiight !
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-12-2008, 12:05 AM
Jazzydave's Avatar
Jazzydave Jazzydave is offline
Musician/Recording Artist
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 4,703
You're cracking me up man. Skydog was definitely one helluva player! I think we'd all love to have some of that (if not ALL) in our hands and tone!

I'm with you on the flameys and especially the quilts. Quilts are a definite no go for me but I don't mind a light flame with the right finish.

When my plaintop tobacco burst Standard got busted up on its way back from England (I was literally sick for days, felt like I was going to spew), I bought a flame top with the insurance money and HATED it. Why? Because everywhere I tool it people were pawing at it! My plaintops never get that kind of attention and I like that. :AOK
__________________
"You can tell whether a person plays or not by the way he carries the instrument, whether it means something to him or not. Then the way they talk and act. If they act too hip, you know they can't play sh*t." - Miles Davis

www.daveowensmusic.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-12-2008, 12:39 AM
Companyman Companyman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mile High
Posts: 223
I am with you on Duane ! As for the flames and quilt tops , they just make me think of those PRS I 'm a Lawyer and have too much $ guitars ! No offense if your a Lawyer ! I see your in Maryland , so you know of these PRS type git-fiddles ! I just moved from Bethesda to Colorado .
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-12-2008, 12:42 AM
Jazzydave's Avatar
Jazzydave Jazzydave is offline
Musician/Recording Artist
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 4,703
Small world...I'm at Fort Meade here in MD.
__________________
"You can tell whether a person plays or not by the way he carries the instrument, whether it means something to him or not. Then the way they talk and act. If they act too hip, you know they can't play sh*t." - Miles Davis

www.daveowensmusic.com
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-12-2008, 12:44 AM
Companyman Companyman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mile High
Posts: 223
my lady was at Fort Detrich (sp)?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-12-2008, 07:55 AM
andrekp andrekp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,487
The basic idea is that cranking the stop bar down tight gives better sustain, because of the maximal hard contact), but also has two effects: It pulls down hard on the bridge, causing sag over time, and the tightness takes away some of the harmonic content from the tone. Some (like me) will also contend that it makes bends a little harder - the strings are less slinky in that configuration. But lots of people come down on both sides of that point.

The second option is raising the stop bar so it's just low enough to properly keep the strings on the bridge. The guitar will sound slightly different and it will not sag the bridge because there is nowhere near the downward pressure. I think it also makes the guitar feel different.

So it's a compromise either way. Lesser tone, bridge sag, less slinkyness vs. Better tone, more slinkyness, but less sustain and bridge sag.

One way to get the best of both worlds is to crank down the stopbar, but then top wrap the strings. This gives good sustain, takes the pressure off the bridge, and gives you more harmonic content and slinkyness. Disadvantage is that most stop bars are not really made for that. Yours might work OK, or you can file down some grooves along the top back edge to give less break angle on the strings, or you can find a stop bar that's made for top wrapping (I use a Tone Tail). Whatever you do, if you top wrap it's going to wear the plating on the stop bar eventually.

Andre
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-12-2008, 10:06 AM
Dana Olsen Dana Olsen is offline
Gold Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, Marin, Chico, CA
Posts: 6,064
There are many theories about the stop bar height.

Bottom line, however, is that they ARE adjustable. Adjust YOUR'S to how you like it.

Gibson through the years has been very inconsistent about the location of the stud. Because of this, some Gibsons work better top wrapped, some with the bar screwed all the way down, some with it raised. Some folks raise it, but put washers underneath so even though it's lifted, it'll be tight to the body/ stud anchor.

There is no "right way", only what works for you.

Thanks, Dana O.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-12-2008, 10:52 AM
Companyman Companyman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mile High
Posts: 223
so I cranked the tail piece down and did the wrap around and I think I love it ! It seems to have a bot more sustain and the strings seem to be a bit more lively and perhaps a bit more slinky . I think I'll try this for a while and see if it makes a difference in my playing . Somehow I don't think I will be any closer to Duane , I guess I have to practice more ! Thanks for the input everybody !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21