A Gear Discussion Website for Musicians |
| Become a Supporting Member |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
12BZ7 info?
I was given this 12BZ7 tube and told that it could be used in V1 for more gain. Has anybody had any experience with this valve?
Happy Holidays
__________________
God made us brothers. Prozac made us friends. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 12BZ7 info?
Quote:
in the PI slot. That should gain things up quite a bit. Try it in both spots then let us know what you found out. Don't worry it won't fry your amp either. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 12BZ7 info?
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Same amplification factor (100) but half the plate resistance.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
...which means they're probably a "better" choice for substituting for a 12AT7 with it's lower rp-value, than using an 12AX7, ie (by gm):
12AT7: gm = 0.0055A/V; rp = 10.9K; mu = 60 12BZ7: gm = 0.0032A/V; rp = 31.8K; mu = 100 12AU7: gm = 0.0022A/V; rp = _7.7K; mu = 17 12AX7: gm = 0.0016A/V; rp = 62.5K; mu = 100 _5751: gm = 0.0012A/V; rp = 58.0K; mu = 70
__________________
DISCLOSURE(s): 1) college-trained electronics kNOw-it-all; 2) cum laude graduate of the school-of-hard knocks; 3) seat-of-the-pants empirical advocate; 4) admirer of Teds (Greene, Weber, and Kennedy). Last edited by Old Tele man; 12-24-2004 at 07:26 PM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guys,
I'm not talking about the specs. Stick the tube in the amp. It doesn't behave like a 12AT7 at all. Hmmm, so it has the same gain as 12AX7 and 1/2 the plate resistance, the result in an amp is more gain, sooner break up. I think it has twice the plate dissapation too. Try it and see. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
12BZ7 : 1.7watts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
...by-the-numbers:
12AU7 : 2.75 W 12AT7 : 2.50 W 12BZ7 : 1.50 W (RCA Manual RC-26, 5/68) 12AX7 : 1.20 W _5751 : 1.10 W ...dissipation-wise, you can always go UP in Wattage without problem, but going DOWN in Wattage isn't wise...shorter tube life and premature failure will almost certainly occur...
__________________
DISCLOSURE(s): 1) college-trained electronics kNOw-it-all; 2) cum laude graduate of the school-of-hard knocks; 3) seat-of-the-pants empirical advocate; 4) admirer of Teds (Greene, Weber, and Kennedy). |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks guys.
I knew it was more, just not sure how much. Not that much more than a 12AX7 either. Also note this tube is in a taller package then the other 12A?7 tube types so you can't use a standard tube shield on it. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
effects of tube swapping...
Ever wonder what happens when you swap preamp tubes? Aside from the "sonic" changes, each different tube also changes the circuit "gain" or voltage amplification (AV), which, in turn, affects when (sooner or later) the tube goes into distortion.
Consider the "normal," cathode-biased, preamp circuit with 12AX7, 100K-ohm plate load resistor (Ra), and 500K-ohm "next-circuit" load (Raa): 12AX7: rp = 62.5K-ohm; mu = 100 Ra' = (Ra||Raa) AV = (mu*Ra')/(Ra' + rp) Ra' = (100K||500K) = 83.3K AV = (100*83.3K)/(83.2K+62.5K) = 57.1 ...thus, while the tube gain is mu =100, the "combined" load (100K||500K) reduces the total "circuit" gain to less than 60! Now, replace the 12AX7 with a 12BZ7 tube and see what happens to the total "circuit" gain: 12BZ7: rp = 31.8K-ohm; mu = 100 AV = (100*83.3K)/(83.3K+ 31.8K) = 73.7 ...the total "circuit" gain actually goes UP by 30% (+2.22dB)! What happened? The two tubes have the same gain (mu =100), so why is there at difference? Answer: tube plate resistance! It is PLATE resistance (rp), NOT tube gain (mu), that has the most affect on circuit gain! Or, stated differently, the tube with the LOWEST plate resistance is LEAST affected by the combination of plate and "next-circuit" loading, and thus LOOSES the LEAST gain because of those circuit loadings!
__________________
DISCLOSURE(s): 1) college-trained electronics kNOw-it-all; 2) cum laude graduate of the school-of-hard knocks; 3) seat-of-the-pants empirical advocate; 4) admirer of Teds (Greene, Weber, and Kennedy). Last edited by Old Tele man; 12-25-2004 at 04:19 PM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
OTm, would it possible for you to do the same evaluation as above also for the 12AT7?
Also, when the thread finishes playing out, I plan to ask the Admin's to archive it - it's highly informative on these topics.
__________________
Jon & his music "We're guilty of the same old thing: talking a lot about less and less and forgetting the love we bring." Garcia/Hunter / `--'( < [] []////////|:::) \_.--.( |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Of course:
Assuming we still have 100K plate and are driving into a 500K input impedence. 12AT7: rp = 10.9K-ohm; mu = 60 AV = (60*83.3K)/(83.3K+ 10.9K) = 53.06 There is, of course, a dirty secret behind some of this. Plate resistance (Rp) is a function of transconductance (Gm) which varies with plate voltage (Ep). Generally, Rp is inversely proportional to Ep and the relationship is non-linear. The values for Rp given so far have been for Ep of 250V. For Ep = 100V, Rp is closer to 15K (just when you thought it would be easy )However, you can still use the equations for basic comparisons of these tubes as long as we keep in mind that the actual gain may be a bit different in your particular amp. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jon Silberman...but, of course!:
12AU7: gm = 0.0022A/V; rp = _7.7K; mu = _17; Pp = 2.75W 12AT7: gm = 0.0055A/V; rp = 10.9K; mu = _60; Pp = 2.50W 12BZ7: gm = 0.0032A/V; rp = 31.8K; mu = 100; Pp = 1.50W _5751: gm = 0.0012A/V; rp = 58.0K; mu = _70; Pp = 1.10W 12AX7: gm = 0.0016A/V; rp = 62.5K; mu = 100; Pp = 1.20W ...in the same circuit (100K-ohm plate load; 500K "next-circuit" load) and sorted by AV-order: 12BZ7: AV = 73.7 (+2.22dB) 12AX7: AV = 57.1 <---original circuit tube 12AT7: AV = 53.0 (-0.65dB) _5751: AV = 41.0 (-2.88dB) 12AU7: AV = 15.5 (-11.3dB) ...thus, a 12BZ7 will "increase" overall circuit gain and yield MORE and sooner crunch. Notice there's not much gain drop between a 12AX7 and 12AT7. Similar analysis would also predict the effect of each tubes' DIFFERENT rp-value upon the circuits' mid- and high-freqency response curves.
__________________
DISCLOSURE(s): 1) college-trained electronics kNOw-it-all; 2) cum laude graduate of the school-of-hard knocks; 3) seat-of-the-pants empirical advocate; 4) admirer of Teds (Greene, Weber, and Kennedy). Last edited by Old Tele man; 12-25-2004 at 04:21 PM. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
rp...actually, current not voltage
...actually, dynamic plate resistance (rp) is fundamentally a function of plate current and not plate voltage:
rp = ( mu / gm ) gm = (3/2)*( (G^(2/3))*(Ip^(1/3) ) rp = (2/3)*(mu) / ( (G^(2/3))*(Ip^(1/3) ) where: Ip = Plate current, amps rp = Tube dynamic plate resistance, ohms mu = Tube Amplification Factor (dimensionless) G = Tube Perveance, amps-per-volt^(3/2)...(essentially a constant) ...this is because mu is essentially (but, not exactly) a constant (it typically varys less than 10-15%) value, which leaves rp to become an inverse cubic-root function of plate current, not plate voltage. NOTE: while these are theoretical equations, they correctly demonstate the proportionality and cause and effect relationships between the various tube paramters. Like the ROOSTER & HEN relationship: "The rooster (voltage) may CROW, but it's the hen (amperage) that gets the JOB done!" -- ie: vacuum tubes are voltage-controlled current devices...hence, the British "value" name.
__________________
DISCLOSURE(s): 1) college-trained electronics kNOw-it-all; 2) cum laude graduate of the school-of-hard knocks; 3) seat-of-the-pants empirical advocate; 4) admirer of Teds (Greene, Weber, and Kennedy). Last edited by Old Tele man; 01-04-2005 at 03:24 PM. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes,
In fact I have wondered about that. Now I'm also wondering how we go about determining the next circuit load (Raa)? Techus Maximus....I can read the fine print right above the arrow pointing to an old tele man fooling around with an amp that Wile E. Coyote is checking out. beep beep.... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|