The Gear Page. A Gear Discussion Website for Musicians
A Gear Discussion Website for Musicians
Become a Supporting Member

Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Amp Technical Info

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-23-2004, 11:56 AM
Mike K Mike K is offline
Silver Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 294
12BZ7 info?

I was given this 12BZ7 tube and told that it could be used in V1 for more gain. Has anybody had any experience with this valve?

Happy Holidays
__________________
God made us brothers.
Prozac made us friends.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-24-2004, 04:39 AM
TheAmpNerd TheAmpNerd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tejas
Posts: 1,056
Re: 12BZ7 info?

Quote:
Originally posted by Mike K
I was given this 12BZ7 tube and told that it could be used in V1 for more gain. Has anybody had any experience with this valve?

Happy Holidays
My buddy swears by them. Though you might try it
in the PI slot. That should gain things up quite a bit.

Try it in both spots then let us know what you found out.

Don't worry it won't fry your amp either.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-24-2004, 08:12 AM
Blue Strat Blue Strat is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sterling, VA (not far from Washington DC)
Posts: 11,549
Re: 12BZ7 info?

Quote:
Originally posted by Mike K
I was given this 12BZ7 tube and told that it could be used in V1 for more gain. Has anybody had any experience with this valve?

Happy Holidays
Not sure where you're "gain" spec is coming from, but the specs say they have the same gain as a 12AX7....u=100.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-24-2004, 01:39 PM
Wakarusa Wakarusa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,499
Same amplification factor (100) but half the plate resistance.
__________________
Todd Shock
Wakarusa Amplification

Use your ears and the grey stuff between 'em.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-24-2004, 04:00 PM
Old Tele man Old Tele man is offline
Techus Maximus
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 7,152
...which means they're probably a "better" choice for substituting for a 12AT7 with it's lower rp-value, than using an 12AX7, ie (by gm):

12AT7: gm = 0.0055A/V; rp = 10.9K; mu = 60
12BZ7: gm = 0.0032A/V; rp = 31.8K; mu = 100
12AU7: gm = 0.0022A/V; rp = _7.7K; mu = 17
12AX7: gm = 0.0016A/V; rp = 62.5K; mu = 100
_5751: gm = 0.0012A/V; rp = 58.0K; mu = 70
__________________
DISCLOSURE(s): 1) college-trained electronics kNOw-it-all; 2) cum laude graduate of the school-of-hard knocks; 3) seat-of-the-pants empirical advocate; 4) admirer of Teds (Greene, Weber, and Kennedy).

Last edited by Old Tele man; 12-24-2004 at 07:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-24-2004, 06:48 PM
TheAmpNerd TheAmpNerd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tejas
Posts: 1,056
Guys,

I'm not talking about the specs. Stick the tube in the amp.
It doesn't behave like a 12AT7 at all.

Hmmm, so it has the same gain as 12AX7 and 1/2 the plate resistance, the result in an amp is more gain,
sooner break up.

I think it has twice the plate dissapation too.

Try it and see.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-24-2004, 06:56 PM
Wakarusa Wakarusa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,499
Quote:
Originally posted by TheAmpNerd
I think it has twice the plate dissapation too.
12AX7 : 1.2watts
12BZ7 : 1.7watts
__________________
Todd Shock
Wakarusa Amplification

Use your ears and the grey stuff between 'em.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-24-2004, 07:24 PM
Old Tele man Old Tele man is offline
Techus Maximus
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 7,152
...by-the-numbers:

12AU7 : 2.75 W
12AT7 : 2.50 W
12BZ7 : 1.50 W (RCA Manual RC-26, 5/68)
12AX7 : 1.20 W
_5751 : 1.10 W

...dissipation-wise, you can always go UP in Wattage without problem, but going DOWN in Wattage isn't wise...shorter tube life and premature failure will almost certainly occur...
__________________
DISCLOSURE(s): 1) college-trained electronics kNOw-it-all; 2) cum laude graduate of the school-of-hard knocks; 3) seat-of-the-pants empirical advocate; 4) admirer of Teds (Greene, Weber, and Kennedy).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-24-2004, 08:02 PM
TheAmpNerd TheAmpNerd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tejas
Posts: 1,056
Thanks guys.

I knew it was more, just not sure how much.
Not that much more than a 12AX7 either.

Also note this tube is in a taller package then
the other 12A?7 tube types so you can't use
a standard tube shield on it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-24-2004, 11:19 PM
Old Tele man Old Tele man is offline
Techus Maximus
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 7,152
effects of tube swapping...

Ever wonder what happens when you swap preamp tubes? Aside from the "sonic" changes, each different tube also changes the circuit "gain" or voltage amplification (AV), which, in turn, affects when (sooner or later) the tube goes into distortion.

Consider the "normal," cathode-biased, preamp circuit with 12AX7, 100K-ohm plate load resistor (Ra), and 500K-ohm "next-circuit" load (Raa):

12AX7: rp = 62.5K-ohm; mu = 100

Ra' = (Ra||Raa)
AV = (mu*Ra')/(Ra' + rp)

Ra' = (100K||500K) = 83.3K
AV = (100*83.3K)/(83.2K+62.5K) = 57.1

...thus, while the tube gain is mu =100, the "combined" load (100K||500K) reduces the total "circuit" gain to less than 60!

Now, replace the 12AX7 with a 12BZ7 tube and see what happens to the total "circuit" gain:

12BZ7: rp = 31.8K-ohm; mu = 100

AV = (100*83.3K)/(83.3K+ 31.8K) = 73.7

...the total "circuit" gain actually goes UP by 30% (+2.22dB)!

What happened? The two tubes have the same gain (mu =100), so why is there at difference? Answer: tube plate resistance!

It is PLATE resistance (rp), NOT tube gain (mu), that has the most affect on circuit gain! Or, stated differently, the tube with the LOWEST plate resistance is LEAST affected by the combination of plate and "next-circuit" loading, and thus LOOSES the LEAST gain because of those circuit loadings!
__________________
DISCLOSURE(s): 1) college-trained electronics kNOw-it-all; 2) cum laude graduate of the school-of-hard knocks; 3) seat-of-the-pants empirical advocate; 4) admirer of Teds (Greene, Weber, and Kennedy).

Last edited by Old Tele man; 12-25-2004 at 04:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-25-2004, 10:46 AM
Jon Silberman's Avatar
Jon Silberman Jon Silberman is offline
regular guy & contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 19,933
OTm, would it possible for you to do the same evaluation as above also for the 12AT7?

Also, when the thread finishes playing out, I plan to ask the Admin's to archive it - it's highly informative on these topics.
__________________
Jon & his music

"One man gathers what another man spills." Robert Hunter

/ `--'(
< [] []////////|:::)
\_.--.(
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-25-2004, 11:35 AM
Wakarusa Wakarusa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,499
Of course:

Assuming we still have 100K plate and are driving into a 500K input impedence.

12AT7: rp = 10.9K-ohm; mu = 60

AV = (60*83.3K)/(83.3K+ 10.9K) = 53.06


There is, of course, a dirty secret behind some of this. Plate resistance (Rp) is a function of transconductance (Gm) which varies with plate voltage (Ep). Generally, Rp is inversely proportional to Ep and the relationship is non-linear.

The values for Rp given so far have been for Ep of 250V. For Ep = 100V, Rp is closer to 15K

(just when you thought it would be easy )

However, you can still use the equations for basic comparisons of these tubes as long as we keep in mind that the actual gain may be a bit different in your particular amp.
__________________
Todd Shock
Wakarusa Amplification

Use your ears and the grey stuff between 'em.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-25-2004, 11:54 AM
Old Tele man Old Tele man is offline
Techus Maximus
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 7,152
Jon Silberman...but, of course!:

12AU7: gm = 0.0022A/V; rp = _7.7K; mu = _17; Pp = 2.75W
12AT7: gm = 0.0055A/V; rp = 10.9K; mu = _60; Pp = 2.50W
12BZ7: gm = 0.0032A/V; rp = 31.8K; mu = 100; Pp = 1.50W
_5751: gm = 0.0012A/V; rp = 58.0K; mu = _70; Pp = 1.10W
12AX7: gm = 0.0016A/V; rp = 62.5K; mu = 100; Pp = 1.20W

...in the same circuit (100K-ohm plate load; 500K "next-circuit" load) and sorted by AV-order:

12BZ7: AV = 73.7 (+2.22dB)
12AX7: AV = 57.1 <---original circuit tube
12AT7: AV = 53.0 (-0.65dB)
_5751: AV = 41.0 (-2.88dB)
12AU7: AV = 15.5 (-11.3dB)

...thus, a 12BZ7 will "increase" overall circuit gain and yield MORE and sooner crunch. Notice there's not much gain drop between a 12AX7 and 12AT7.

Similar analysis would also predict the effect of each tubes' DIFFERENT rp-value upon the circuits' mid- and high-freqency response curves.
__________________
DISCLOSURE(s): 1) college-trained electronics kNOw-it-all; 2) cum laude graduate of the school-of-hard knocks; 3) seat-of-the-pants empirical advocate; 4) admirer of Teds (Greene, Weber, and Kennedy).

Last edited by Old Tele man; 12-25-2004 at 04:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-25-2004, 12:37 PM
Old Tele man Old Tele man is offline
Techus Maximus
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 7,152
rp...actually, current not voltage

...actually, dynamic plate resistance (rp) is fundamentally a function of plate current and not plate voltage:

rp = ( mu / gm )

gm = (3/2)*( (G^(2/3))*(Ip^(1/3) )

rp = (2/3)*(mu) / ( (G^(2/3))*(Ip^(1/3) )

where:

Ip = Plate current, amps
rp = Tube dynamic plate resistance, ohms
mu = Tube Amplification Factor (dimensionless)
G = Tube Perveance, amps-per-volt^(3/2)...(essentially a constant)

...this is because mu is essentially (but, not exactly) a constant (it typically varys less than 10-15%) value, which leaves rp to become an inverse cubic-root function of plate current, not plate voltage.

NOTE: while these are theoretical equations, they correctly demonstate the proportionality and cause and effect relationships between the various tube paramters.

Like the ROOSTER & HEN relationship: "The rooster (voltage) may CROW, but it's the hen (amperage) that gets the JOB done!" -- ie: vacuum tubes are voltage-controlled current devices...hence, the British "value" name.
__________________
DISCLOSURE(s): 1) college-trained electronics kNOw-it-all; 2) cum laude graduate of the school-of-hard knocks; 3) seat-of-the-pants empirical advocate; 4) admirer of Teds (Greene, Weber, and Kennedy).

Last edited by Old Tele man; 01-04-2005 at 03:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-25-2004, 09:15 PM
TheAmpNerd TheAmpNerd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tejas
Posts: 1,056
Yes,

In fact I have wondered about that. Now I'm also
wondering how we go about determining the
next circuit load (Raa)?

Techus Maximus....I can read the fine print
right above the arrow pointing to an old
tele man fooling around with an amp
that Wile E. Coyote is checking out.

beep beep....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2009, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Banner Design: Chris Sileo