Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Effects, Pedals, Strings & Things

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2010, 08:55 PM
rich2k4 rich2k4 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,985
so what exactly is "tone suck"

i see it used a lot here. tone is a very broad subject, so what exactly gets "sucked" from the tone?

do you think it's mostly in the player's head? or does it really exist.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2010, 09:06 PM
Turnipfarmer Turnipfarmer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 381
my names not webster but tone suck to me is when you have a rig and setup that is able to really give you what you want to hear and then you introduce something into that chain, a cable, bypass, tuner, whatever, and your perfect tone goes away, is strangled, mal eq'd, ect.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-26-2010, 09:12 PM
Trashbag_Travis Trashbag_Travis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOSTON, MA
Posts: 148
plug your guitar straight to your amp. now go through about 5 pedals with 15 foot cords before and after. you'll hear a difference.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2010, 09:20 PM
steveb steveb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 521
Okay, I'll bite.

To me, anything that takes away or adds to your fundamental tone in an "unpleasing" way can be considered tone suck. Too many pedals & long cable lengths may decrease treble response or highs. SPDT switches that don't completely remove a pedal's circuitry when "bypassed". Those are forms of tone suck. Even a guitar's volume control can cause tone suck as you turn it down because of the decreased treble response.

Also, some buffers on non-true bypassed pedals try to compensate for the loss & add highs. That's tone suck in my book, too. It just happened to me with a Muza delay/reverb pedal.

Bridge saddles can suck tone, too. I changed some on my Strat, & the brightness was totally changed because the saddles were brass & not steel. I didn't like that at all.

Anyway, lots of things can suck tone, & many people may actually like the things that I consider tone suck. It's not just in my head either, it's real.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-26-2010, 09:22 PM
gishlullmoon gishlullmoon is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 407
tone suck is horrrible!!!! especially if u are palying through a shitty crate small amp................ get a decent beast and its not AS bad............ but still sucks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-26-2010, 09:27 PM
nrvana8775 nrvana8775 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,078
Tone suck = attenuated highs, muffled mid/lows, destruction of dynamics

basically...when you lose the spank, sparkle, and balls.
__________________
G&L Legacy/Asat -> Pigtronix Philosopher King -> Hardwire RV-7 -> Diamond Memory Lane -> Strymon Blue Sky Reverb ->Lightfoot Labs Goatkeeper -> WMD Geiger Counter -> Moog Midi Murf Deals: Maven, Dkrobs, Reentune, Zion, Markom89, Meanmud, Straycat23, Droptop, Steveyandstevey, John B, Clemduolian, Dognmoon, Desperado, Fatfingers, many more.

Last edited by nrvana8775; 05-26-2010 at 10:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-26-2010, 10:00 PM
walterw walterw is online now
Gold Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 15,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by nrvana8775 View Post
Tone suck = attenuated highs, muffled mid/lows, destruction of dynamics

basically...when you lose and the spank, sparkle, and balls.
i'll go with this, and narrow it down even more:

"tone suck" when talking about guitar signal chains is the specific loss of treble signal caused by passive pickups going through poor or overly long cable runs (including too many switched-off true-bypass pedals)

and/or

going into pedals that load down the signal (old-school non-buffered, non-T-B pedals, volume pedals, rack gear that wasn't designed for passive guitar signal), causing an "impedance mismatch" that bleeds away treble.

buffers eliminate tone suck from everything that happens down the line. you may not like the tone of a certain buffer, but that's a tone change, not a tone suck. calling your TU-2 a tone-sucker is a mis-use of the term.

same with saddles or other mechanical parts of the guitar. using the term "tone suck" for that stuff is just muddying the definition.
__________________
Walter Wright
Guitar Repair Gnome
Alpha Music, Va Beach
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-27-2010, 12:20 AM
phoenix 7's Avatar
phoenix 7 phoenix 7 is offline
Gold Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West of NYC
Posts: 16,758
Tone suck = loss of clarity, loss of "color" (to my ears). Can be easily perceived if you have a true bypass loop switcher that you can use to instantly switch pedals in and out of your chain.
__________________
They said, "You have a blue guitar,/ You do not play things as they are."
The man replied, "Things as they are / Are changed upon the blue guitar."

Good deals with Phil M, Peteyvee, Burnsonix, Tonefree, GarMan, Irreverent, goldtrek, jtx99, instep music, heady dude, hurleysurf, tvegas99
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-27-2010, 02:17 AM
SBLP SBLP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 440
Quote:
so what exactly is "tone suck"
I wanna paste an image of this guy getting a blowjob, but can't find one.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-27-2010, 02:18 AM
this1smyne this1smyne is offline
Silver Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mt P. SC
Posts: 2,497
when my fingers don't do what my mind tells them to do. than my tone sucks.
__________________

I build things
This1smyne.com
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-27-2010, 02:24 AM
SBLP SBLP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 440
Tone suck usually refers to buffers or the bypass mode of a pedal that reduces the high end sparkle of your guitar's normal tone.

As in guitar>amp is "pure". Guitar>pedal(disengaged)>amp: not as pure. Something is missing, or "sucked" out of your true natural tone.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-27-2010, 03:42 AM
Classic09 Classic09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 660
The term 'tone suck' is as valid as the word 'weed'. By definition, a weed is merely a plant growing where it is not wanted. 'Tone suck' is much the same: something introduced to the guitar -> amp chain that changes the sound in an unacceptable way.

One mans weed is another mans flower
One mans 'tone suck' is another mans sound

Eg. Many of our favourite songs have been played and/or recorded using boss pedals yet around TGP they are frowned upon.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-27-2010, 04:08 AM
SBLP SBLP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 440
Well, they don't cost a paycheck, and have icky buffers. How can they possibly be any good?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-27-2010, 04:20 AM
hb_nz hb_nz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 331
Tone suck mostly = marketing BS.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-27-2010, 05:56 AM
amz-fx amz-fx is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic09 View Post
One mans 'tone suck' is another mans sound
I was adding to my 20 Commandments of FX last week, and added this one:

One man's tone suck is another man's warm sound.

Great minds think alike

regards, Jack


.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21