Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > Instruments > The Small Company Luthiers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-22-2010, 07:01 PM
lukeII lukeII is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,734
Tyler guys whats the difference Classic vs SE

I own a 2007 Landau Black Classic that I really love It is just one of the best Strat type guitar that I've tried. Its in a different vibe from two really good strats I have (a Mayer and a maple neck CS). So I've been thinking about picking up a Maple neck Studio Elite but do the Tyler crowd know if there are any differences in feel of the SE vs the Classic model (neck profile, frets)?

The body dimensions look a little different with easier access to the upper frets. Also all things being equal (wood type, pickups) do SEs sound different than Classics i.e. do they sound more modern or vintage or some other charactertic?

Thanks
__________________
Good transactions: samtheman, stressfest, mezcalhead, orogeny, DavidH Guitars: Historic LP special, 59 ES335 & 59LP reissues, Tyler Landau Classic, 56 Strat relic, 55 Masterbuilt Tele, Collings D2H Amps: Two Rock Classic Reverb Fave FX: Kemper, Tim, Zendrive, Cornish G2, MP SHOD, Mojovibe & TES.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-22-2010, 07:32 PM
Flinto2002 Flinto2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,066
Body style and headstock style, that's it.

The Classic is the traditional strat shape with front mounted input jack and a smaller peghead.

The Studio Elite has sightly elongated horns that are cut deeper for better upper fret access, a side mounted input jack and a slightly larger peghead.

Typically, classics tend to come with 6 screw vintage style tremelo's and Klusson locking tuners, while SE's tend to come with 2 point trems and Sperzels. But I've seen them come every which way.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-22-2010, 10:19 PM
lukeII lukeII is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,734
Thanks for the info. I actually tried a studio elite burning water back in 2005 or 2006 but its hard to remember what that was like I do recall that I liked the guitar but found the frets too big I think they were 6100 or jumbo. My classic came with 6105 (tall vintage) which I like a lot more on a strat type guitar.
__________________
Good transactions: samtheman, stressfest, mezcalhead, orogeny, DavidH Guitars: Historic LP special, 59 ES335 & 59LP reissues, Tyler Landau Classic, 56 Strat relic, 55 Masterbuilt Tele, Collings D2H Amps: Two Rock Classic Reverb Fave FX: Kemper, Tim, Zendrive, Cornish G2, MP SHOD, Mojovibe & TES.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2010, 12:44 AM
eliot1025 eliot1025 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow
Posts: 1,152
Aside from what's listed above -
The SE has tighter curves on the body edges making it less likely to slip on your lap.
The SE has a deeper belly cut.
A neck tint is standard on the Classic. The SE necks are un-tinted.
Klusons are standard on the Classic.

Both models have a set of normal options but you actually have your choice of frets, woods, electronics, finishes, hardware, radii, nut widths and headstocks on either model pending Jim's willingness to do the unusual. (I.e. I have an SE HD with a Classic headstock.) It will depend on his mood and other mysteries. What you can't change is the pickguard shape and body design, i.e. the SE can back-routed but I don't think that was an option on the Classic. I'm not sure if he'd make a Classic with no neck tint.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2010, 04:14 AM
lukeII lukeII is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by eliot1025 View Post
The SE has a deeper belly cut.
LOL Sounds like a guitar to grow old and out with.

Thanks for the info sounds like you can within reason of the respecting the model basic specs you can get it customised to your specs. Do you have the mid boost function and do you reckon it is a good feature to have or is it more of a gimmick
__________________
Good transactions: samtheman, stressfest, mezcalhead, orogeny, DavidH Guitars: Historic LP special, 59 ES335 & 59LP reissues, Tyler Landau Classic, 56 Strat relic, 55 Masterbuilt Tele, Collings D2H Amps: Two Rock Classic Reverb Fave FX: Kemper, Tim, Zendrive, Cornish G2, MP SHOD, Mojovibe & TES.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-23-2010, 06:22 AM
LordRiffenstein's Avatar
LordRiffenstein LordRiffenstein is offline
Purveyor of great tone!
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Boortmeerbeek, Belgium
Posts: 1,219
I have a Classic and SE with the exact same specs (body wood, neck wood/shape, tuners, trem etc), the only exceptions are the bridge humbucker and the SE having the midboost with the bypass button. At one point, both guitars had the same humbucker although one with, the other without cover. Besides the visual differences, there's also a slight difference in weight but that's probably also caused by the wood, more than the different outlines.

When playing them side by side, the Classic is really that, a more classic sounding Tyler, it seems to have more chime and sound a bit sweeter overall. The SE sounds more modern. Both do have the typical Tyler growl and great feel. Both have Suhr V60LP single coils and I find that on the Classic i can raise them a bit more than the SE without them getting a harsh overtone. Comparing them acoustically, I would say the Classic has a bit more sustain but when plugged in it seems that the SE sings more.
__________________
LordRiffenstein
http://www.facebook.com/LordRiffenstein

Dealer for MarkL Custom, MLC Amplifiers, El Musico Loco, RR Amps Fat Drive, Mogami, Van Damme, Curt Mangan, Burkey, Cioks
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-28-2010, 01:48 AM
eliot1025 eliot1025 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow
Posts: 1,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by lukeII View Post
LOL Sounds like a guitar to grow old and out with.

Thanks for the info sounds like you can within reason of the respecting the model basic specs you can get it customised to your specs. Do you have the mid boost function and do you reckon it is a good feature to have or is it more of a gimmick
The mid-boost is useful - not a gimmick at all. The midboost extends the frequency range of your pups (in both directions) even when the boost knob is all the way down. So, the bypass button is important if you want to have the option of the regular sound of your pickups.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-28-2010, 11:36 AM
lifeson1 lifeson1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New York City Metro
Posts: 421
Jim would shoot me for this, but I had both an SEHD and a Classic, and I always drifted back to my Classic, and I'm a hard rock guy. I loved the sustain, the frets, the shape. . . everything. That being said, I could see myself picking up another SE, but my Classic will always be with me.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-28-2010, 11:46 AM
DWB1960 DWB1960 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 17,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by eliot1025 View Post
The mid-boost is useful - not a gimmick at all.
Agreed. It's almost like having an OD pedal built into the guitar.

I believe a lot of the SEs are also mildly chambered.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-29-2010, 02:17 PM
Pabliani Pabliani is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by eliot1025 View Post
Aside from what's listed above -
The SE has tighter curves on the body edges making it less likely to slip on your lap.
The SE has a deeper belly cut.
A neck tint is standard on the Classic. The SE necks are un-tinted.
Klusons are standard on the Classic.

Both models have a set of normal options but you actually have your choice of frets, woods, electronics, finishes, hardware, radii, nut widths and headstocks on either model pending Jim's willingness to do the unusual. (I.e. I have an SE HD with a Classic headstock.) It will depend on his mood and other mysteries. What you can't change is the pickguard shape and body design, i.e. the SE can back-routed but I don't think that was an option on the Classic. I'm not sure if he'd make a Classic with no neck tint.
Off Topic and for you Eliot:

Do you know when Jim started the Classic and S/N for the first ones?

Thanks so much.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-30-2010, 01:42 AM
JDouglee JDouglee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunset Beach, CA
Posts: 1,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by eliot1025 View Post
The mid-boost is useful - not a gimmick at all. The midboost extends the frequency range of your pups (in both directions) even when the boost knob is all the way down. So, the bypass button is important if you want to have the option of the regular sound of your pickups.
That's a great description there. Almost like a 'loudness' contour.

I like the strattiness of my Classic, but I have a 20 year old SE Jimburst I'll never part with, it's just sounds so good...midboost or straight.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21