Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Amps and Cabs
Reload this Page So did Marshall discontinue the Vintage Modern series?
Register FAQ Gear Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 1 of 7 1 234567
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-23-2010, 07:18 PM
firebird1999us firebird1999us is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 630
So did Marshall discontinue the Vintage Modern series?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-23-2010, 09:11 PM
Foxtrot Foxtrot is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: with your mom
Posts: 726
'fraid so.

They were good enough amps, just didn't seem to catch on. Of all the sounds they could get, I liked the high-gain w/ a boost. It could get fairly heavy.

I think it was FastRedPonyCar who had some YT vids of it running that way.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Peterson View Post
....The assumptions of some folks are sincerely sad and closed-minded, and wrong.
Originally Said by Bugs Bunny
Flibbidy flobbidy floop.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2010, 09:13 PM
ripoffriffs ripoffriffs is offline
Supporting Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,113
It was just a repackaged DSL series.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2010, 10:10 PM
firebird1999us firebird1999us is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by ripoffriffs View Post
It was just a repackaged DSL series.
Was it the same circuit?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2010, 10:27 PM
GT100 GT100 is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Asgard
Posts: 1,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrot View Post
'fraid so.

They were good enough amps, just didn't seem to catch on. Of all the sounds they could get, I liked the high-gain w/ a boost. It could get fairly heavy.

I think it was FastRedPonyCar who had some YT vids of it running that way.
Interesting I found the Cleans to be the best part and the tone got worse as the gain was increased. For me the high gains were too ratty, fuzzy and loose.

Lloyd
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-23-2010, 11:48 PM
Sniper-V Sniper-V is offline
Supporting Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by ripoffriffs View Post
It was just a repackaged DSL series.
The DSLs are far better.

VMs were very bad sounding amps IMO.

The JVM is the best "new" amp Marshall has done.
__________________
Guitars: Gibson CS '59 LP RIs, Fender CS Strats & Teles Relics, PRSi, Santa Cruz DPW
Amps: TR; Morgan; Xits; Jackson; Carol-Ann; Pure 64; Matchless; Bad Cat; Bruno; JMJ; Vox; Fender
Dealer Affiliation: Gibson; Fender; PRS; 65amps; 3 Monkeys; Blackstar; Empress; Bogner FX; Zvex; T-Rex; Carl Martin; EH; and more...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-23-2010, 11:51 PM
firebird1999us firebird1999us is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 630
The digital reverb thing annoys me on modern marshall's
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-24-2010, 08:56 PM
Foxtrot Foxtrot is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: with your mom
Posts: 726
Quote:
Originally Posted by GT100 View Post
Interesting I found the Cleans to be the best part and the tone got worse as the gain was increased. For me the high gains were too ratty, fuzzy and loose.

Lloyd
Try it with a Tube Screamer or Bad Monkey set for mostly clean boost.

I gotta say, I was impressed with it run that way.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Peterson View Post
....The assumptions of some folks are sincerely sad and closed-minded, and wrong.
Originally Said by Bugs Bunny
Flibbidy flobbidy floop.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-24-2010, 09:05 PM
somedude somedude is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,792
What I don't understand is why Marshall can't buy a couple of popular hot-rodded Marshall type amps and try to learn a thing or two about how to build a hot-rodded Marshall from them....
__________________
Ignore the hype and trust your ears. Play more, buy less = better tone.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-24-2010, 09:10 PM
Orbis_Mortis Orbis_Mortis is offline
Supporting Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 647
No, the VM is not discontinued. Thery are only going to be available in black instead of purple. The VM is definitely not a repackaged DSL. The VM is an awesome amp that probably didn't catch on because it is only one channel. But everyone thought is was two channels. Also, you have to really get to know the amp to get a great sound out of it. The EQ works different than any other amp. You have to get the right mix of Body and Detail.

Anyways, I love my VM and so does Slash, Robin Trower, Paul Gilbert, etc., etc....
Last edited by Orbis_Mortis; 07-24-2010 at 09:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-24-2010, 09:24 PM
xntrick xntrick is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: chicago area
Posts: 3,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by somedude View Post
What I don't understand is why Marshall can't buy a couple of popular hot-rodded Marshall type amps and try to learn a thing or two about how to build a hot-rodded Marshall from them....

couldn't agree more..i see that Blackstar has a 100w tube head with 3 channels for about $900, does Marshall have anything that is similar?
__________________
Warmoth Superstrat, EMG-81X, EMG Afterburner - Swollen Pickle, BYOC tri-boost, MXR ZW-44, AMT S1 - Peavey 3120, WGS ET65, Seismic Audio 2x12
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-24-2010, 09:29 PM
Jazzpilfer Jazzpilfer is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Gladewater, TX
Posts: 189
HORRIBLE amp. I like 1 channel amps, this thing was/is garbage. Marshall is not something I would buy new, or anything they have made in years.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-24-2010, 09:36 PM
Orbis_Mortis Orbis_Mortis is offline
Supporting Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzpilfer View Post
HORRIBLE amp. I like 1 channel amps, this thing was/is garbage. Marshall is not something I would buy new, or anything they have made in years.
That's why Slash, Robin Trower, and Paul Gilbert use them. Even Joe Bonamassa has some as backup amps to his Silver Jubilees. Jeff Beck has even used one.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-24-2010, 09:58 PM
inmusica inmusica is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: BUffalo, NY
Posts: 37
These amps are incredible. Most people didn't like them because 1. you have to turn them up and 2. because they are unforgiving.

You really have to be able to play well tho make them sound good.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-24-2010, 10:02 PM
V-Type V-Type is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Metro Detroit,Michigan
Posts: 2,748
Marshalls research apparently mistepped imo on these.
They seem to favor the Ma's and Haze as well as another half modeler half amp design.
Other than being overpriced a few $$$$ the JV 's were Very nice amps and quite tweakable.
__________________
Some stuff Ive used and owned...
Gibson - Fender - Epiphone - Squier - Agile - Jackson -
Laney - Line6 - Egnater - Carvin - Marshall - Crate -Peavey - Boss - Ibanez - Dunlop - MXR - DiMarzio - Seymour Duncan - EMG - Schaller -PRS - Mesa - Supro.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 7 1 234567

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:19 AM.

Terms of Use - Rules of Conduct - Contact Us - The Gear Page - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21