Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear > Amps and Cabs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2005, 08:38 PM
sabbath90 sabbath90 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 563
'tung-sol' reissue tubes

has anyone used the tung sol reissue 12ax7's? how do they sound? i'm thinking about trying some new preamp tubes out. thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2005, 09:23 PM
baron55 baron55 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 168
Tung-SOL

I picked up a few of the Tung-Sol 12AX7A tubes. They are identical in appearance to the Electro Harmonix EH12AX7's. With the exception that the getter is slightly different. They have plenty of gain and are pretty linear sounding with a big bottom end. The highs are a little edgy and harsh like the other New Sensor (Sovtek offerings). They do not sound like the NOS Tung-Sol tubes. IMO they are beefed up versions of the Electro Harmonix 12AX7's with more gain and a more linear tone. I think these would do better in Hi Fi amps. They were very punchy and compressed sounding. I much prefer the JJ ECC803's for current production tubes. I would say these are the best Sovtek New Sensor 12AX7's. High gain users may like these more than rock or blues players.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-27-2005, 09:26 PM
sabbath90 sabbath90 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 563
thanks a bunch man. that saved me some cash. now i can get more GT 12ax7-m's and JJ ecc803's.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2005, 09:31 PM
illinimax's Avatar
illinimax illinimax is offline
Gold Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,227
Quote:
Originally posted by sabbath90
thanks a bunch man. that saved me some cash. now i can get more GT 12ax7-m's and JJ ecc803's.
How do those ecc803s sound?
__________________
Too many amps to list ... very partial to units from Cornell, Matchless, Tophat and Tone King
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2005, 09:44 PM
baron55 baron55 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 168
I picked them up just to see what they were all about. I already have nearly a lifetime of Current Production 12AX7's. But had to try these out. They are good but not what I was looking for.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2005, 09:46 PM
sabbath90 sabbath90 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 563
to me, the 803's sound like regular JJ 12ax7's but not as dark and more 'complex'. the high end sounds very nice and 'airy'. i'm a fan for most amps. i prefer the standard JJ's in my soldano astroverb due to it being a very trebly and bright amp.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-27-2005, 09:49 PM
baron55 baron55 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 168
The ECC803 tubes are very sweet sounding with nice harmonics with average to high gain. They are not high gainers like the Chinese 12AX7's but have plenty on tap for most applications. I like the the ECC803's because they are very clear and detailed very transparent but also focused and forward sounding. The highs are very nice not dark like the JJ ECC83's. IMO I would say these are the best all around current production 12AX7 type tybes for almost any music type. There are others, but they seem to excell only in certain areas where this tube covers a wide spectrum.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-02-2005, 12:25 PM
sdgvintage sdgvintage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bristow, VA
Posts: 348
New sensor bought the TungSol name along with mullard. So don't expect re issue tung sols to sound much different than Sovteks.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-02-2005, 12:43 PM
baron55 baron55 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 168
The do indeed sound like Sovteks tonally. The bottom end is bigger and tighter and the mids are better, by they still have that high end harshness that all new sensor tubes seem to have.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-02-2005, 12:46 PM
MVrider MVrider is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: If I'm not here, check over there.
Posts: 1,799
Last time I checked, it's what's inside the tube that makes the difference, not what's stamped on the outside. Apparently not everyone agrees with me on this.
__________________
Right. And people are too fat because they don't eat enough food.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-02-2005, 01:06 PM
baron55 baron55 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 168
I actually bought 3 of the Tung-Sol reissue tubes. And I was dissapointed in the tone. They are sitting in their respective boxes in my "tube drawer" Actually the plate materials have a big effect on tone. Every Sovtek, New Sensor preamp tube I have tried (I own versions of all of them) they all had that linear, harsh high end. Some people like them, which is just fine. But the re-issues are far from anything near a real Tung-Sol. I characterize the Tung-Sol 12AX7's as a upgraded version of the Electro Harmonix 12AX7EH.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-03-2005, 01:03 PM
voodoogreg voodoogreg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: left of center
Posts: 2,749
Of all the tubes NS makes, (and I deal them so I have been throw a lot of them) the EH 12ax7 seem's to have the least harshness, and closer to vintage tube's like mullard/tungsol. (not that they sound anything like them, just less fizz on top)

They are bactch sensitive, and some EH-12ax7's are rounded, and pretty sweet yet fat sounding. you almost need to
buy a fe more then needed and weed out the fizzy ones. VDG
__________________
Jeannette Maria Nanini-Lockhart
1938 to 2005

Hi-Tone Cab Endorsee

Give to the Multiple Sclerosis Foundation. http://www.msfacts.org/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21