Become a Supporting Member


Go Back   The Gear Page > The Gear Page Lounge > The Sound Hound Lounge

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:36 PM
Funky54 Funky54 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,735
Are You A Beatle or a Stone?

Are you a Beatle or a Stone?

It’s really that simple. Most of us like some of both, but when it comes right down to having to pick one, there is a clear choice. I have lived in three very different locations in my life. One was dominated by the Stone crowd, One the Beatle, and one just plain confused.

If it doesn’t relate to you… well your wrong. Beatle and Stone are just fun ways of stereotyping the two main types in us musicians.

I am totally alone where I am now. I am totally surrounded “by Stones” They don’t want or like a song driven band. They don’t like stacked harmonies or pop in any way. No hooks. They are blues based and don’t like where my playing is centered.

Here are two lists of bands. You may like some from each (I do) but one list is dominant with you. One your likes gravitate to. Your ability musically is drawn to one of these lists.

List One “The Beatle”
Led Zepplin
Thin Lizzy
ELO
Boston
Foo Fighters
Weezer
Queen
Mick Ronson
Urge Overkill
Space Hog
Beach Boys
Stray Cats
Bowie
Glen Miller
Duke Ellington

List Two ”The Stone”
Cream
The Doors
CCR
Rush
Pink Floyd
Molly Hatchet
Lynard Skinnard
Hendrix
SRV
Allmon Brothers
Black Keys
Neil Young
Howlin Wolf
Son House
BB king

So what are you? You love serving the song? Love working out arrangements and vocal harmonies? Or is that restrictive and taking your freedom? Most of the first list you'd have to learn that bands songs and arrangements. You'd have to have structure. The second list is jam bands in many ways. Sure, both band types did jam songs. Both did structured songs with lots of chord changes, but were stereotyping for fun here.

Last edited by Funky54; 04-11-2011 at 02:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:39 PM
rdamato rdamato is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ramsey, NJ
Posts: 565
The Stone. Just look at who's on the list. GOOD THREAD!! It also could have been titled: AC-30 VS Bassman/JTM-45
__________________
www.knightcrawlers.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:41 PM
Tigerfang Tigerfang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 56
Is it odd that I greatly prefer the Beatles, yet by far prefer the Stones list?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:41 PM
rollyfoster rollyfoster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,363
my brain likes the beatles, my gut likes the stones. i usually go with my gut.

looking at that list, however, i think zeppelin may be the one band who falls in between.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:43 PM
Brian D Brian D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Land of 10,000 Lakes
Posts: 4,987
Elvis.
__________________
“There's no air conditioning in the Blues." - Shelby Lynne, Live From Daryl's House
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:43 PM
Tenebrous Tenebrous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigerfang View Post
Is it odd that I greatly prefer the Beatles, yet by far prefer the Stones list?
*Nod*
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:48 PM
Chicago Slim Chicago Slim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sebastion, FL
Posts: 1,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian D View Post
Elvis.
+1, Elvis!

If you remember Pulp Fiction, it was Beatle people or Elvis People.

I used to be a Stone, but I reformed.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:52 PM
coreybox coreybox is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 4,543
Much prefer the beatles over the stones (but I like both!).

I definitely don't like all the bands on the beatles list. Especially boston, which is actually one of my least favorite groups.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:53 PM
TwoTubMan's Avatar
TwoTubMan TwoTubMan is offline
---Hardcore Tifosi---
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Late of Pablo Fanques Fair
Posts: 8,814
The Animals.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:55 PM
foureyes foureyes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah, by way of Cali
Posts: 1,024
I find myself (looking at the list of bands) being in both camps.
__________________
Guitars:57 strat, 72Tele, Les Paul Copy,EVH Wolfgang Special,Larrivee L-09E
Amps: Vox Ac15, B-52 AT100 Head and 412 Cab
PedalBoard: Signa Comp, OCD,Timmy, BB pre,CWM Muff, CE-2 Timefactor, ekko616, Midi mouse, Boss tuner, Verbzilla
Offboard: Digitech XP100,Line6 DL4 Modeling: HD500+AltoTS110a! <><
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:57 PM
chucke99 chucke99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,522
I'm a Beatle, but I disagree with your list of other bands that go along with preferring either the Stones or Beatles. You can't make any of those assumptions. The Beach Boys? Are you kidding? Boston? Uggh.

I actually really hate it when people try to categorize the Beatles vs. the Stones. It always seems to break up this way: Beatles are more "pop" while the Stones are more "rock" or "cool". These lists are usually created by guys who like the Stones better and thus, put all the cool bands on their side of the fence.

So I'm a Beatle. Here are my other favorite bands:

Rush
Judas Priest
(Ulrich Roth-based) Scorpions
Frank Zappa
Neil Young
Black Sabbath
Led Zeppelin
Nirvana
Soundgarden
Alice in Chains
Tool
Bob Dylan
Hot Tuna

and many more...
__________________
Proposed TGP Golden Rule: Comment unto other guitar players' skills as you would have others comment unto yours.

www.chucke.com/guitars
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-11-2011, 01:58 PM
Funky54 Funky54 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,735
To each of us the list would be some different. Some bands truly fall between for me and wouldnt for you. Stones have some well arranged songs that hav elots of chord progressions and stacked harmonies that I like, but thats not "the Stones" Beatles had some down to earth blues songs with rawness and simple arrangements...but thats no the Beatles.

I think you know what I'm getting at.

As to Boston... Lots of chord progressions and lots of structure and harmonies. Deffenatly serving the song and not the ability. Have to be on the Beatle side
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-11-2011, 02:00 PM
small axe small axe is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,137
ur list does not compute
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-11-2011, 02:02 PM
Funky54 Funky54 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucke99 View Post
I'm a Beatle, but I disagree with your list of other bands that go along with preferring either the Stones or Beatles. You can't make any of those assumptions. The Beach Boys? Are you kidding? Boston? Uggh.

I actually really hate it when people try to categorize the Beatles vs. the Stones. It always seems to break up this way: Beatles are more "pop" while the Stones are more "rock" or "cool". These lists are usually created by guys who like the Stones better and thus, put all the cool bands on their side of the fence.

So I'm a Beatle. Here are my other favorite bands:

Rush
Judas Priest
(Ulrich Roth-based) Scorpions
Frank Zappa
Neil Young
Black Sabbath
Led Zeppelin
Nirvana
Soundgarden
Alice in Chains
Tool
Bob Dylan
Hot Tuna

and many more...
I'm a Beatle.. but Neil Young? on the Beatles side??? Your list is lots of good music, but I say some from each camp, just like my list of good music would be. But as to lots of difficult arrangements with stacked harmonies and cool Jazz undertones... Many on your list a re raw and good rockers, just not Beatlish to me.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-11-2011, 02:03 PM
crzyfngers crzyfngers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: texas (lots of edible animals)
Posts: 5,036
like... a stoned beatle man.
__________________
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013, The Gear Page, LLC, Brian Scherzer
All rights reserved.
Header Graphic by NetThink 21