shoe

Member From Longmont, CO

Joined: Jan 30, 2002

Last seen: Mar 15, 2023

Latest activity Postings About Post areas

- shoe reacted to Defendant's post in the thread I tried a SLO. It was awful. What next? with Like.
  
  I do agree that in 2023, getting a good amp is not difficult. We would have killed for what was available now back in '88.
  
  Mar 15, 2023
- shoe reacted to Dead Astronaut's post in the thread I tried a SLO. It was awful. What next? with Like.
  
  I mean, in principle, yes, but there's a pretty big gulf between "SLO on 10 with a Pentagon-scale rackmount budget, expensively recorded...
  
  Mar 15, 2023
- shoe reacted to DangMe's post in the thread I tried a SLO. It was awful. What next? with Like.
  
  I saw Ratt several years back and when Warren switched to the crunch channel of his SLO for the intro of Back for More, it was amazing...
  
  Mar 15, 2023
- shoe reacted to Fezziwig's post in the thread I tried a SLO. It was awful. What next? with Like.
  
  Warren Haynes gets some pretty fantastic tones of his SLO. But let me add something here - I find the SLO100 is NOT my favorite gain...
  
  Mar 15, 2023
- shoe reacted to Steve Snider's post in the thread I tried a SLO. It was awful. What next? with Like.
  
  I Love The SLO! Great amp IMHO.
  
  Mar 13, 2023
- shoe reacted to icantbelieveitsnotbuddha's post in the thread I tried a SLO. It was awful. What next? with Like.
  
  The SLO was developed when Mike saw that most gigging players in the early to mid 80's had a Fender Twin and a Marshall JMP on stage to...
  
  Mar 13, 2023
- shoe reacted to Coalface1971's post in the thread I tried a SLO. It was awful. What next? with Like.
  
  Hi Tommy, I'm an OG/pre-BAD SLO owner, and will 100 percent agree that it isn't the amp for everybody. It is very unforgiving (**** in...
  
  Mar 13, 2023
Show older items
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Home
Members