350 watt 1977 Twin Reverb?

Discussion in 'Amps and Cabs' started by iluvstrats, Jan 14, 2008.


  1. iluvstrats

    iluvstrats Member

    Messages:
    2,471
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2002
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    A friend of mine has a friend who is trying to sell what he says is a rare 1977 Twin Reverb that has 350 watts. I told him I don't think there is such a thing but he insists that it's true.

    Is there such a thing as a 350 watt twin reverb? What would the tubes be?
     
  2. Stormin

    Stormin Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,321
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Location:
    Raleigh-wood, NC
    The only thing that comes to mind is the mid to late 70's Super Twin Reverb. IIRC, it's six 6L6's for 150 watts. These were the ones that Nugent used to use - six of them I believe.

    Stormin!
     
  3. plexi67

    plexi67 Member

    Messages:
    360
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2004
    alot of people mix up the rating on the back panel of an amp..its the power consumtion rating, or it may have an extension AC socket,and they put a sticker or it has a rating on the panel for this. And it may say 350 watts. This meaning you can plug things into that recepticle up to that amount.
    Or the amp uses 150 watts of power.
     
  4. John Phillips

    John Phillips Member

    Messages:
    13,080
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Location:
    Scotland
    It's the power consumption, not the power output. It says it next to the fuse holder. It will also say 135W RMS under the speaker jacks, which is the output power.

    Either your friend hasn't spotted that, doesn't know much about how amps are rated, or is deliberately trying to exaggerate. It's a perfectly normal, and not rare at all, 135W Ultra-Linear model Twin Reverb, made in many thousands between 1976 and 1982.
     
  5. SW33THAND5

    SW33THAND5 Member

    Messages:
    5,091
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Location:
    D4LLA5, T3X45!
    widely regarded as one of the worst sounding amps fender produced. did he mention that?
     
  6. openbar

    openbar Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,104
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Location:
    Boston
    Myth.
     
  7. bosstone

    bosstone Member

    Messages:
    3,398
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Location:
    Oakland CA
    If there was one, its greatest benefit would be to tube suppliers and chiropractors.
     
  8. GCDEF

    GCDEF Supporting Member

    Messages:
    25,463
    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2005
    Location:
    Florida
    No, it's the truth. Horrible sounding things.
     
  9. openbar

    openbar Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,104
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Location:
    Boston
    Maybe the "Super Twin" doesn't sound so great, but regular Twins from that era are still an excellent amp. Big, clean sound. It's amazing how much people pooh-pooh these things, all a big fat myth. They sold thousands of them, and they are still valuable and usable.
     
  10. GCDEF

    GCDEF Supporting Member

    Messages:
    25,463
    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2005
    Location:
    Florida
    Regular Twins probably do sound good. Super Twins, at least the one my friend had, was horrible.
     
  11. re-animator

    re-animator Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,255
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Location:
    New York/San Diego
    why not just get a regular twin and do the 180 watt dick-dale mod?? :)
     

Share This Page