1. The Rules have been updated regarding posting as a business on TGP. Thread with details here: Thread Here
    Dismiss Notice

AD-9, vintage or not

Discussion in 'Effects, Pedals, Strings & Things' started by winterheadphone, Feb 19, 2009.

  1. Feb 19, 2009 #1
    winterheadphone

    winterheadphone Member

    Messages:
    189
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Location:
    Canada
    I purchased an Ibanez AD-9 recently from a guy who swore it was vintage. I was amazed at the shape it was in. Now, I'm wondering if I got hosed.

    How can I tell if he was telling the truth or not?
     
    winterheadphone, Feb 19, 2009
    winterheadphone, Feb 19, 2009
    #1
  2. Feb 19, 2009 #2
    ajchance

    ajchance Member

    Messages:
    359
    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Location:
    Deep in the heart of Central Texas
    Pot codes?
     
    ajchance, Feb 19, 2009
    ajchance, Feb 19, 2009
    #2
  3. Feb 19, 2009 #3
    analogmike

    analogmike Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    6,213
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Location:
    Connecticut
    see my ts9 history page, the bottom plates in the new ones are different
     
    analogmike, Feb 19, 2009
    analogmike, Feb 19, 2009
    #3
  4. Feb 19, 2009 #4
    blackba

    blackba Supporting Member

    Messages:
    9,140
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2005
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    How do the old AD-9's compare sound wise to the new AD-9's? Anyone compared them?
     
    blackba, Feb 19, 2009
    blackba, Feb 19, 2009
    #4
  5. Feb 20, 2009 #5
    winterheadphone

    winterheadphone Member

    Messages:
    189
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Location:
    Canada
    I've looked on your page( been there many times, actually) and couldn't find anything specific about Ibanez or the AD-9 but, did read about the final numbers in a SN sometimes being the year. My AD-9 has the SN - 0540090. That would mean 1990 if I'm right.

    Am I right?

    Should I mod it? You're the dude I should ask! hahahahahhaa
     
    winterheadphone, Feb 20, 2009
    winterheadphone, Feb 20, 2009
    #5
  6. Feb 20, 2009 #6
    todaystomorrow

    todaystomorrow Member

    Messages:
    2,703
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Location:
    Nashville TN
    The Keeley mod is worth it just for the oscillation switch IMO.
     
    todaystomorrow, Feb 20, 2009
    todaystomorrow, Feb 20, 2009
    #6
  7. Feb 20, 2009 #7
    winterheadphone

    winterheadphone Member

    Messages:
    189
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Location:
    Canada
    Is there nothing about the fact that it's vintage that would make sense to leave it that way?
     
    winterheadphone, Feb 20, 2009
    winterheadphone, Feb 20, 2009
    #7
  8. Feb 20, 2009 #8
    Bobster

    Bobster Supporting Member

    Messages:
    351
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Location:
    Where lions spit water!
    hmm i've heard that the vintage ad9 has more headroom and "wetness" than the new ones.

    Anyone can give any info on the quality of the components? I had a reissue before as well.
     
    Bobster, Feb 20, 2009
    Bobster, Feb 20, 2009
    #8
  9. Feb 20, 2009 #9
    todaystomorrow

    todaystomorrow Member

    Messages:
    2,703
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Location:
    Nashville TN
    I guess that's up to you... I see you have a Memory Lane, so if you're just using this for slapback... then maybe leave it alone. If you find that it's not a reissue, I'd send it in for a mod and feel better about getting it. I'm sure it sounds pretty good either way. It does a great, dark slapback.
     
    todaystomorrow, Feb 20, 2009
    todaystomorrow, Feb 20, 2009
    #9
  10. Feb 20, 2009 #10
    myTakamine

    myTakamine Member

    Messages:
    275
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    You should be able to verify that you have an original by looking at the chips. Analogman has more info, scroll down a bit from this link to read this:

    And from the linked article from Legendary Tones comparing the re-issues from Maxon and Ibanez to each other and the originals...

     
    myTakamine, Feb 20, 2009
    myTakamine, Feb 20, 2009
    #10
  11. Feb 24, 2009 #11
    winterheadphone

    winterheadphone Member

    Messages:
    189
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Location:
    Canada
    Oh oh!

    I opened it up, compared the chips to the ones from the analogman website and found that the chips did not match up.

    I don't know much about each chip and what it does but, I'm going to post them in the hopes that someone can confirm.

    3208A
    52465
    (two of those)

    BL3102
    05 NT
    34367

    4558D
    JRC
    5111A

    SA571N
    CPEK0443

    Thanks for all your help so far
     
    winterheadphone, Feb 24, 2009
    winterheadphone, Feb 24, 2009
    #11
  12. Feb 24, 2009 #12
    myTakamine

    myTakamine Member

    Messages:
    275
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    It looks like you have a re-issue, with the Shanghai Belling chips. The 3208A is the bbd, and the BL3102 is the clock.
     
    myTakamine, Feb 24, 2009
    myTakamine, Feb 24, 2009
    #12
  13. Feb 24, 2009 #13
    winterheadphone

    winterheadphone Member

    Messages:
    189
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Location:
    Canada
    Un-believable!

    Thank you for your help. I will be contacting the seller and will be demanding a refund.

    Not cool.
     
    winterheadphone, Feb 24, 2009
    winterheadphone, Feb 24, 2009
    #13

Share This Page