Ok guys, debating a CT 45, older model. Already have TAG's input! I had a UG30 and just didn't like it. I know, I know they are different. THE UG was nice, but I just didn't "get it". NOt for that $ at least. PLus it didn't have enough girth. I love big iron and huge lows. I love that big BF clean tone. COuld care less about gain, but on the edge fo gain si nice, must take OD well. Tones I want in my head for this amp are chewy and thick. Thing is, I am also debating a '65 (real) Twin that sounds great but needs some work, it is $1800. To me the Twin is what I am seeking for this tone. Soooo, which one ya think? WOuld the Bruno actually possibly be better? I don't want as good, I want better if that's possible. From my reading the Bruno might be thicker overall so I'm on the fence here. I know, so subjective, just looking for your opinions to to tip the scales for me guys.