Dean seeks trademark cancellations against Gibson, alleges dealer interference

Discussion in 'Guitars in General' started by gunslinger, Jul 10, 2019.

Tags:
  1. Stinky Kitty

    Stinky Kitty Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,746
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    ...and to think all these years, Michael has been playing a "counterfeit" Flying V. Someone needs to inform him immediately. :facepalm
     
  2. cutaway

    cutaway Supporting Member

    Messages:
    16,803
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Think of the embarrassment this guy is suffering

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2019
    hookakat1 likes this.
  3. vanderkalin

    vanderkalin Member

    Messages:
    1,913
    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Location:
    Kimberley BC
    Really? Michael Schenker? Who does Gibson have that has more cred ? I play Gibson’s FWIW.
     
    Slicklickz likes this.
  4. vanderkalin

    vanderkalin Member

    Messages:
    1,913
    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Location:
    Kimberley BC
    You know, you could be right, but I see an awful lot of teenyboppers wearing Zeppelin t shirts even now, and they don’t look ironic in the least.
     
  5. vanderkalin

    vanderkalin Member

    Messages:
    1,913
    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Location:
    Kimberley BC
    I disagree as a parent. The best thing dads could do to keep Gibson relevant is buy their kid a Jackson.
     
  6. Stinky Kitty

    Stinky Kitty Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,746
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    The timing of that early June hit piece on Armadillo is suspect, noting there is no credited writer of the article and the following: Gibson's suit was filed in the United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Texas in May, but amended on 6 June 2019.

    That article? Written on June 3.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2019
    hookakat1 likes this.
  7. DewieCox

    DewieCox Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,771
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Nobody in 2019 is buying a guitar because Michael Schenker uses it. If I started naming names I wouldn’t be able to stop, but I was referring specifically to the list that Dean supplied.
     
  8. Stinky Kitty

    Stinky Kitty Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,746
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
  9. cutaway

    cutaway Supporting Member

    Messages:
    16,803
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Location:
    North Carolina
    And the guys who are because [insert rock god here] used it are the same guys who were when he used it back in the day. If you check Ebay sales in the last 90s days, Clapton and Beck only sold 60 and 22 respectively. To be fair, Mike sold 15. Not too bad for a no-name, nobody.
     
  10. MoPho

    MoPho Pho Shizzle

    Messages:
    5,473
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    DFWTX
  11. sub rosa

    sub rosa Member

    Messages:
    1,234
    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Location:
    Kiwi-Brit in CO
    I could call it something else ;)
     
  12. Rockledge

    Rockledge Member

    Messages:
    4,905
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Location:
    mars
    That is exactly my point. Read the entire thread, not just response posts.
    I've made that quite clear all along.

    To make it plain and simple : It appears to me Gibson might be trying to use a trademark as if it were a patent. Because the patent is no longer in effect, and a trademark is the best they've got. .
    Hence, I think it is a patent issue, not a trademark issue. And if that patent is expired, then there simply is no issue.
     
  13. Rod

    Rod Tone is Paramount Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    17,955
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    Location:
    Area 51 & Seacoast ME
    Well said!
     
  14. Sweetfinger

    Sweetfinger Supporting Member

    Messages:
    10,782
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    So what if they were. The quality is not an issue here. That they existed and were being made is my point.
    Yes. It was certainly serendipitous that Pantera's breakout disc popped in the early 90s, and popularized the ML to some extent, but Dean was already in transfer and re-establishment of US production, and the product line was far wider than a single artist-driven model. Dean was on the road to reinvention and re-introduction to the US markets BEFORE Cowboys From Hell was released, and the company would have done largely what it did, what every guitar company has done that has followed that model, be it Schecter, ESP, Washburn, or BC Rich.
    It has been stated here and on the web as "common knowledge" that Dean was "out of business", so Dime had to go to Washburn for his signature guitar. If he went to Washburn, how did that help Dean? Was Dime singlehandedly responsible for Washburn's turnaround and market growth in the early to mid 90s, or was it really just a concerted push by the brand owners?
    I'll add that in the great big world of musical instrument retail, the reach and influence of Diamond Darrell was not what it later became, and not what you make it out to be. "Cowboys" never cracked the top 100, though it did sell well, reaching gold record sales in three years. For comparison, "Headhunter" by Krokus reached gold in one year and reached #25 on the Billboard 200. Pantera was kind of a niche band then and I assure you Dime did not have the cache to successfully launch a new "Dean" with a complete line of fretted musical instruments all by his lonesome. I think your view on the subject may be a bit myopic.

    It CAN be. If you design a shape that acts as its own stand, or say, locks itself into its case like a puzzle piece for stability during transport, that's a function, and can be patented.
    The ah, problem, with patenting a guitar body shape is that the patent runs out, sooner than you might like. Then you're high and dry and everyone gets to use your design free and clear, which is what happened with the V, Explorer, and Humbucking pickup. Some aspects of a design cannot be patented or trademarked. A wheel just by nature of what it does has to be round. You can't patent that and can't trademark the look of a wheel because that's an inherent aspect of the function. It has to be round to work.
    A trademark can be renewed, which is why it's better to trademark something distinctive if the novel functionality of your design is maybe murky, or a matter of opinion.
    FWIW Gibson applied for the V trademark after the design patent had expired.
     
    Benz2112 likes this.
  15. AudioWonderland

    AudioWonderland Member

    Messages:
    5,046
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    And you would still be wrong
     
    hookakat1 likes this.
  16. Kurt L

    Kurt L Member

    Messages:
    3,592
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Location:
    Outer Austin, TX
    I’m not sure I’m clear on your position. Could you please run it by me one more time?
     
    jaded1592, Gevalt, 27sauce and 2 others like this.
  17. Tom Gross

    Tom Gross Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    5,915
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Which, of course, is the only thing Trademarks are about: A purchaser being confused that they bought the real thing.
    This all has nothing to do with patents.
     
    hookakat1 likes this.
  18. KevWind

    KevWind Member

    Messages:
    370
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2018
    Location:
    Edge Of Wilderness Wyoming
    I am confused why so many here seem confused
    A Bone stated it plain and simple .


    The entire issue is if Gibson can establish the V ,Explorer and 355 body shape as "protected trademarks". Which they failed to do with the LP shape.
     
  19. Rockledge

    Rockledge Member

    Messages:
    4,905
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Location:
    mars

    I don't particularly have a position, I am, like most here, discussing the situation and responding to posts with various considerations. Feel free to read through the thread and absorb the various ideas presented and respond if you wish.
     
  20. sub rosa

    sub rosa Member

    Messages:
    1,234
    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Location:
    Kiwi-Brit in CO
    You calling it "wrong" doesn't make it so. ;)
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice