theactor19
Senior Member
- Messages
- 286
...Or did he just crank his marshalls, without any mics and PAs for the guitar.
Its no wonder that big live concerts today make the guitars sound crappy. I say paul mccartney live, and they did a tribute to hendrix with some solos over foxy lady, and the guitars sounded horribly digital.
Its no wonder that big live concerts today make the guitars sound crappy. I say paul mccartney live, and they did a tribute to hendrix with some solos over foxy lady, and the guitars sounded horribly digital.
The writing in this post reaks of "Following along with the what the crowd tells me think."
By the time we get to Hendrix in the late 60's to Woodstock era, engineers are very often mic'ing guitar amps especially for the larger venues where PA was not just for vocals, but drums, bass, guitar, percussion, etc. I've seen a bunch of Hendrix video and there are definitely mic's on the cabs for what I've seen.
Keep in mind that those could be for recording the gig. On youtube, there are recordings of plenty of live concerts. So perhaps those mics were strictly for recording.
He just cranked em. They probably mic'ed him up for Woodstock, but in those days, PA systems were very primitive, and usually used for vocals only.
Keep in mind that those could be for recording the gig. On youtube, there are recordings of plenty of live concerts. So perhaps those mics were strictly for recording.
What difference does it make? Not trying to be a smart-ass. Just wondering.
? If this was the case, why would the bassist and drummer even show up? You wouldn't even be able to hear them over Marshall stacks cranked and vocals going through a PA!
? If this was the case, why would the bassist and drummer even show up? You wouldn't even be able to hear them over Marshall stacks cranked and vocals going through a PA!
Does recording also explain the "two vocal mikes gaffer-taped together" thing that you see in some old concert videos? Is it one mike for recording and one for FOH?