Does the Boss DD3 delay sound better than the Digidelay ?

Discussion in 'Effects, Pedals, Strings & Things' started by JohnK24, Jan 13, 2008.

  1. Jan 13, 2008 #1
    JohnK24

    JohnK24 Supporting Member

    Messages:
    5,351
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Location:
    North of Pittsburgh, PA
    In terms of clarity and sound quality (noise). Also does the Boss unit have a better bypass than that of the Digitech Digidelay ? I had the Digidelay, but I sold it as it seemed to really suck the tone out of my small pedal chain (comp, OD, chorus and delay). I even tried removing the chorus (CS9) from the chain, but the delay seemed to suck the tone (the OD and comp are true bypass).

    thanks,

    J
     
    JohnK24, Jan 13, 2008
    JohnK24, Jan 13, 2008
    #1
  2. Jan 14, 2008 #2
    telefmt

    telefmt Member

    Messages:
    320
    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Location:
    Maine
    I'm very happy with my DD-3. It is dead quiet and doesn't seem to alter my volume or tone at all. I haven't tried the Digi but I know how the Boss sounds to me.
     
    telefmt, Jan 14, 2008
    telefmt, Jan 14, 2008
    #2
  3. Jan 14, 2008 #3
    clothwiring

    clothwiring Member

    Messages:
    6,785
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Location:
    Central NY
    I'd go with this response too...I have an older DD-3. Had a newer one and didn't like it as much.

     
    clothwiring, Jan 14, 2008
    clothwiring, Jan 14, 2008
    #3
  4. Jan 14, 2008 #4
    Rossl

    Rossl Member

    Messages:
    298
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2005
    Location:
    Northern NJ
    I have an older DD3 and the Digidelay. I like the DD3 for shorter delays, I think the Digidelay sounds warmer (not as clear) when in tape sim mode for lonegr delays.

    I have both on my board
     
    Rossl, Jan 14, 2008
    Rossl, Jan 14, 2008
    #4
  5. Jan 14, 2008 #5
    HHB

    HHB Member

    Messages:
    6,643
    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2002
    Location:
    East Flat Rock NC
    I've had good luck w/the Digidelay, I run crybaby, Barber direct drive, digidelay into a Tophat club royale w/ great success. I only use the tape delay setting and leave it on a "reverb"
     
    HHB, Jan 14, 2008
    HHB, Jan 14, 2008
    #5
  6. Jan 14, 2008 #6
    DaveG

    DaveG Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    2,506
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Location:
    High Desert, SoCal
    Same here, I use both & haven't found either one to be a tone sucker, on or off. I only use the DigiDelay in Tape mode, and until recently, have always thought it sounded much better than the DD-3; I sent the DD-3 to Analogman, he worked it over & took the harshness out of it, now it's excellent. Might have to get another one to replace the DigiDelay! :AOK
     
    DaveG, Jan 14, 2008
    DaveG, Jan 14, 2008
    #6
  7. Jan 14, 2008 #7
    batlas

    batlas Member

    Messages:
    52
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    I think there are some differences in DD-3's I believe there have been 3 production models. I have a Big chip MIJ model and it sounds wonderfull. My favorite delay for slapback type of stuff. I'd probably go for an echopark rather than a digitech model if size is the deciding factor.

    But buffer wise your probably safest with the DD3..
     
    batlas, Jan 14, 2008
    batlas, Jan 14, 2008
    #7
  8. Jan 14, 2008 #8
    afterburner

    afterburner Member

    Messages:
    1,542
    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2006
    Digidelay replaced my MIT DD-3. I like the many features the Digidelay has and I usually keep it on the Tape echo mode. Having the reverse and loop modes are cool too. The Digidelay seems to have more bang for the buck.
     
    afterburner, Jan 14, 2008
    afterburner, Jan 14, 2008
    #8

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...
    Dismiss Notice