Fender '68 Custom Vibrolux Reverb vs. Hot Rod Deville ML 212 for pedal platform

Discussion in 'Amps and Cabs' started by AD1982, Feb 15, 2017.

Fender '68 Custom Vibrolux Reverb vs. Hot Rod Deville ML 212

  1. Fender '68 Custom Vibrolux Reverb

    11 vote(s)
    45.8%
  2. Hot Rod Deville ML 212

    12 vote(s)
    50.0%
  3. Other (around or lower than the price of the two, share below)

    1 vote(s)
    4.2%
  1. AD1982

    AD1982 Member

    Messages:
    906
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Location:
    Waterford, Michigan
    The background story: I absolutely love my Friedman Runt 20, but I hate it's efx loop (and I love reverb). I ordered one in December. Played a bunch at home, but I had a little noise when using the efx loop (which I hear is an issue). In and of itself, it wasn't a deal breaker. However, I play at church as well, and the noise thru the efx loop tripled there. It had to be at least 5 to 10 dbs. of noise. So I requested that Sweetwater send me a replacement, and they graciously did. However, the new one is even worse. I had the two sitting next to one another and the new one was obviously noisier. Which leads me to my question...

    I think I'm going to move to one of these two amps (Fender '68 Custom Vibrolux Reverb vs. Hot Rod Deville ML 212), plus a Friedman BE-OD pedal. I wonder which will be the better platform. I assume the ML 212 would be due to the speaker choice, but I thought I'd poll the group for opinions. I've played thru both and I enjoyed both of them.

    Whatcha think?
     
  2. p.snail

    p.snail Member

    Messages:
    785
    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2003
    Location:
    Union, Ky
    I think the ML. I love the Vibrolux clean, but not so much with pedals. Just me.

    As another option, you could probably find a used Deville 2x12 for 400 or less, upgrade the speakers and be in the ballpark of the ML. To my ear the ML wasn't a drastic update to the platform. He basically replaced the drive channel with another clean channel to use as a solo boost and put celestions in it.

    The ML was intentionally configured as a pedal platform.
     
  3. AD1982

    AD1982 Member

    Messages:
    906
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Location:
    Waterford, Michigan
    Those Devilles sure do have quite the resale drop don't they...
     
  4. p.snail

    p.snail Member

    Messages:
    785
    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2003
    Location:
    Union, Ky
    Yeah, but I think it's because they are a dime a dozen. That hot rod line is one of the most produced/sold amps in history. They are solid for the most part. They are just common, which makes them very affordable. Win if you ask me...lol.
     
    Rhythm Rocker likes this.
  5. FenderBigot

    FenderBigot Supporting Member

    Messages:
    23,672
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Location:
    Tampa Bay
    I found the ML version of the HR amp to be a bit sterile sounding, not special. The only '68 CVR I played was not working properly so it sounded weak.

    Have you considered the Blues Deville/Deluxe? I find the Blues series to have a slightly warmer sound and more pleasing to the ears.
     
    blackba likes this.
  6. AD1982

    AD1982 Member

    Messages:
    906
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Location:
    Waterford, Michigan
    They break up a bit too soon for me, plus the stock speaker is harsh and rather shrill.
     
  7. AD1982

    AD1982 Member

    Messages:
    906
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2015
    Location:
    Waterford, Michigan
    To throw a wrench in the gears, what about a Marshall Mini Jubilee combo?
     
    tone? likes this.
  8. p.snail

    p.snail Member

    Messages:
    785
    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2003
    Location:
    Union, Ky
    I don't disagree with this, but I think it's that characteristic that makes it a fairly pedal "friendly" amp. They aren't overly picky about what drives you put in front of them. They're just sort of vanilla. The pedals are the toppings....lol.
     
    FenderBigot likes this.
  9. ColonelForbin

    ColonelForbin Member

    Messages:
    1,700
    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2015
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    Not out yet, so can't compare or play one yet; but, is the PRS Sonzera on your radar?
     
  10. Billy Moss

    Billy Moss Member

    Messages:
    4,480
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2015
    I am interested in the Hot Rod Deville ML 212 for a pedal platform, but the PRS Sonzera 50 watt combo is on the radar.
     
    ColonelForbin likes this.
  11. Sigmund Floyd

    Sigmund Floyd Supporting Member

    Messages:
    2,159
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Location:
    Mass
    What about the new Orange Rocker 32?
     
    ColonelForbin and la noise like this.
  12. la noise

    la noise Member

    Messages:
    21,178
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2013
    Location:
    North Of Where You Are
    I'm eager to check one out. On paper it
    seems like an ideal combo! :aok
     
    ColonelForbin likes this.
  13. FrankCapraMoment

    FrankCapraMoment Member

    Messages:
    765
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2015
    Haven't played the ML model, but I can tell you that the Custom Vibrolux is a fantastic pedal platform. Truly my idea of robust Fender clean which wouldn't "color" pedals and let them naturally shine. I never really valued this dynamic - I figured any amp with good cleans would be a good pedal platform, how would one be better than another? It wasn't until I played through other Fender amps that paled in comparison when I realized just how wonderfully the VL dealt with distortion and delay pedals.
     
  14. lenster

    lenster Member

    Messages:
    828
    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Location:
    Newcastle Australia
    Why not try a Supersonic 60?
     
  15. deeval

    deeval Supporting Member

    Messages:
    2,040
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Location:
    palmdale
    I have owned and played my 68 custom Vibroluxe for over 2 yrs and it has not given me any problems, I changed one speaker to a G10 and it sounds great with the stock speaker left in, All pedals are all good in this amp.
     
  16. elicxirmixer

    elicxirmixer Member

    Messages:
    198
    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2014
    Location:
    Milford, CT
    I used a Hot Rod Deluxe as a pedal platform for a few years before moving to a Deluxe Reverb. I have to say that I couldn't be happier now. The Hot Rod was a clean machine that played nicely with every overdrive pedal I put in front of it, but at the end of the day I always found myself wrestling with the EQ knobs. Mind you, this is strictly at band volumes, where bass and treble are tricky the louder you get.
    When I switched to the Deluxe Reverb, I stopped having the bass/treble battle with my volume changes. The amp compresses so nicely at the band volume range that I barely touch the knobs anymore. Granted it's a little bit pickier about the pedals I put in front of it, but I've found enough that work.
     
  17. PCalugaru

    PCalugaru Member

    Messages:
    1,247
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    I think a lot of you guys are getting a ML HRDeville confused with a Standard Deville...

    You guys are aware its a totally different amp than a Deville minus the drive right?

    I don't know anyone who has played this amp and called it sterile, everyone I know who has played one says it's what a HRD should have been. This amp retired my 1972 Twin Reverb because it sounded that much better. Premer Guitar in their review put it up against a 1966 Black Face Twin Reverb (Yea,,, a black face!) and said it was it's equal. Sterile? then I'll play sterile any day.....

    To the OP....... The 68 Custom Vibrolux is a solid amp with its own merits... but if your choosing which one based on "it" being the best pedal platform, the ML HRDeville is a cut above... The ML HRD has a higher head room and volume than a standard Deville (Different Transformer and phase inverter schematics) and a different tone stack (yes still in the HRD family but much brighter than a deville) & with the heavier trans, comes with a pretty good touch sensitivity not usually found in a PCB off the shelf amp. It has a simple design i.e super gig friendly one channel, two volumes (no need for a boost pedal!)

    IMO... probably one of Fenders best amps made in years. Oh yea It melds with pedals like super glue to hair....

    You do know what Michael Landau is known for right? (being an incredible studio muscian and recording artist ) not to mention having Fabled tones while using a pedal rig... usually playing Fenders, and much of the time live he would use two HRDs set on clean ( one set at a lower volume and would a/b them for solos and accents....) Kinda of designed this amp to do the work of two amps...
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2017
    Billy Moss likes this.
  18. FenderBigot

    FenderBigot Supporting Member

    Messages:
    23,672
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Location:
    Tampa Bay
    ^^^ I am a Fender fan boy... trust me when I say to my ears it was not special. Ymmv :dunno
     
  19. PCalugaru

    PCalugaru Member

    Messages:
    1,247
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Now you're changing it up... "Special" and "Sterile" are two different things...

    The amp certainly isn't "sterile" It trumps my 72 twin and Premier Guitar's review...& countless other reviews in print and on the internet... none using the description "sterile" IMO... Being one of the best amp designs by Fender in the last few years yea I'd call it "special"...

    but is it "your" special...? Obviously not...
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2017
    FenderBigot likes this.
  20. Cal Webway

    Cal Webway Member

    Messages:
    9,586
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Location:
    Larry, ND
    I have the Fender ML. Sometimes use a pedal.
    Great amp.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice