Fender Pickups: Fat 50's vs. '69s Please compare
- Thread starter Derelict
- Start date
Hi guys - good to be here.
I've played both of these sets extensively, and here's my assesment of them:
Fat 50's are the higher output of the two sets, but not as high as Texas Specials. They have a nice warm, roundish tone with lots of mid-range. Neck can border on dark, but the bridge pickup is really nice - strong output with good bark and grind. The "in between" sounds (pos. 2 & 4) are good, but many other single coil sets out pace these in the "quack" dept. Nice warm cleans, and they work well with overdrive. To me, they do the SRV overdrive better than the Texas Specials, but that's my opinion, yours may vary....
CS 69's are low output single coils. The clean sound is crystal clear with tons of chime and shimmer. Significantly less mids than the 50's, but stunning bass and great clear trebles. In between sounds are good - clearer than the 50's and a little more hollow, but with more of a volume drop from the 1,3,5 positions than other SC's I've played. Neck - think "Wind Cries Mary." Easily my favorite Fender neck pickup. Bridge can be brittle and spikey. I tend to keep the bridge pup pretty high with this set to boost output a bit and to take the edge off, but the bridge pup is the liability of this set. Pos. 2 & 4 will do Little Wing with ease and even venture into Sultans of Swing. Overdrive can be a challenge to get just right because the output is so low, but if you take the time to dial it in just right, you can get some great crunch.
My preference is the 69 set, but bear in mind that I like single coils to be clean, clean and clean with lots of chime. I'm not a big fan of pronounced mids. The Fat 50's are good though. If I was looking for a "hot" single coil that maintained the character of a classic pickup but with better grind, I'd probably go that way......
Hope that helps.
I've played both of these sets extensively, and here's my assesment of them:
Fat 50's are the higher output of the two sets, but not as high as Texas Specials. They have a nice warm, roundish tone with lots of mid-range. Neck can border on dark, but the bridge pickup is really nice - strong output with good bark and grind. The "in between" sounds (pos. 2 & 4) are good, but many other single coil sets out pace these in the "quack" dept. Nice warm cleans, and they work well with overdrive. To me, they do the SRV overdrive better than the Texas Specials, but that's my opinion, yours may vary....
CS 69's are low output single coils. The clean sound is crystal clear with tons of chime and shimmer. Significantly less mids than the 50's, but stunning bass and great clear trebles. In between sounds are good - clearer than the 50's and a little more hollow, but with more of a volume drop from the 1,3,5 positions than other SC's I've played. Neck - think "Wind Cries Mary." Easily my favorite Fender neck pickup. Bridge can be brittle and spikey. I tend to keep the bridge pup pretty high with this set to boost output a bit and to take the edge off, but the bridge pup is the liability of this set. Pos. 2 & 4 will do Little Wing with ease and even venture into Sultans of Swing. Overdrive can be a challenge to get just right because the output is so low, but if you take the time to dial it in just right, you can get some great crunch.
My preference is the 69 set, but bear in mind that I like single coils to be clean, clean and clean with lots of chime. I'm not a big fan of pronounced mids. The Fat 50's are good though. If I was looking for a "hot" single coil that maintained the character of a classic pickup but with better grind, I'd probably go that way......
Hope that helps.
buddastrat
Member
- Messages
- 14,689
he nailed it
Hipster Dofus
Member
- Messages
- 2,331
Are the Fat 50's like the Fralin Vintage Hots?
DrJamie
Silver Supporting Member
- Messages
- 1,611
Fender's '58 reissues with fat 50's have been some of my favorite sounding guitars. The maple neck and Fat 50's is a great combo to my ear. I had 2, and sold them because of the small frets, and vintage radius. Haven't heard the 69's, but the description fits the real one I've played recently. I think the Fat 50's just haven't gotten their due, not being boutique gear.
Tonebender
Silver Supporting Member
- Messages
- 607
The 69's are great pickups. They have a good amount of Jimi in them.
Low output is always the way to go if want your guitar to be versatile.
Low output is always the way to go if want your guitar to be versatile.
These soundclips could be useful...
Hipster Dofus
Member
- Messages
- 2,331
Looks interesting.
duckbunny
Member
- Messages
- 3,525
I've had guitars with Fat 50's and '69s ( One guitar had both in them at one time or another) and I agree that they are different variations on a theme - corgiears is right on the money IMO. That said, I much prefer the CS 54 pickups. To me, they just sound like the pickups on a really good early 50's Strat - not overly hot, not overly hollow, great quack, just right...and not too expensive either! The sound , to me, is just *Strat*, y'know?
-db
-db
mojoslide
Member
- Messages
- 1,120
keithrick, let us know how it sounds when you're done. I am curious about the Fat 50s as I am pretty sure that is where I am going for my next set of pups. I am replacing my Lace Hot Gold sensors as they just sound too thin and brittle at band/gig volumes.
alderboy - thanks for the link to those clips.
alderboy - thanks for the link to those clips.
Hipster Dofus
Member
- Messages
- 2,331
Hijack mode.....
Where do the 65' CS pups fall in all this?
Where do the 65' CS pups fall in all this?
I know that this is an old post but I would like to ask something about that volume drop that you said. Is this normal?corgiears said:
When I play in the 2 & 4 position, not only volume drops, but the sound is a bit "dull" ...
Can I fix this "problem" by adjusting the height of the pickups?
Trending Topics
-
-
-
-
Is Digitech Out Of Business? Website Seems to be Down- Started by Wesman61
- Replies: 118
-
