First Run Gibson LP Classic?

Discussion in 'Guitars in General' started by Jeroen, Jun 9, 2005.


  1. Jeroen

    Jeroen Guest

    When I bought this guitar, I was told this was a First Run. Now someone is telling me it is not. Is there an expert who can help me and knows this?

    And if not, would there be a difference in price between a first and a second run?

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Unadan likes this.
  2. Rob Livesey

    Rob Livesey Member

    Messages:
    165
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2002
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    A far as I understand it, the first Les Paul Classics had "Les Paul Model" on the headstock just like a regular Les Paul. I had a classic with Les Paul Model on the headstock and I've never seen another. It also had a VERY skinny neck.

    Rob.
     
    Unadan likes this.
  3. Mark Kane

    Mark Kane Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,606
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    Jacksonville
    What Rob said. The first classics were pretty much identical to the super expensive Reissues and the dealers had a hard time justifying the high cost of the reissues as you could not tell them apart except fot the way the serial number worked. On classics the first number was the year, on reissues the second number was the year. So, they change the head stock to read Les Paul Classic. I had a '93 with model on the headstock so they used that at least that long.
     
    Unadan likes this.
  4. Mark Kane

    Mark Kane Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,606
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    Jacksonville
    The other notable change was the neck angle, the bridge sat quite a bit higher on the classic than the reissue.
     
    Unadan likes this.
  5. HHB

    HHB Member

    Messages:
    6,643
    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2002
    Location:
    East Flat Rock NC
    hey Jeroen, nice LP!
     
    Unadan likes this.
  6. Jeroen

    Jeroen Guest

    Thanks :D

    And thanks for your answers!
     
    Unadan likes this.
  7. tiptone

    tiptone Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    750
    Joined:
    May 23, 2004
    Location:
    Montgomery, TX
    A big +1.

    I don't know anything about what you asked but that is definitely one fine looking guitar.
     
    Unadan likes this.
  8. slipbeer

    slipbeer Supporting Member

    Messages:
    5,707
    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Location:
    Center City, MN
    I bought one in 1991 that said Les Paul Model.

    I was a nice guitar but got alot nicer when I put Antiquities in it.

    You can definitely improve it with some better PU's
     
    Unadan likes this.
  9. Bluedawg

    Bluedawg Member

    Messages:
    10,242
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2002
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    I have a '91 also. It is my understanding tha '91 was the first year for the classics, but Icould be wrong.

    Yours is probably a '94.

    :cool:
     
    Unadan likes this.
  10. Johnnytone

    Johnnytone Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,683
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    Classics started in 1990. Yours is a 94. In 93 the "MODELl" was changed to "CLASSIC" and later in the year the cutaway binding got thicker (or vice-versa, I can't recall).
     
    Unadan likes this.
  11. fred dons

    fred dons Member

    Messages:
    309
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    you can see it as well on the inlays, your classic has the famous snotgreen inlays which are now in the classics, whereas the first series had the normal MOP one
     
    Unadan likes this.
  12. fred dons

    fred dons Member

    Messages:
    309
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Unadan likes this.

Share This Page