Gibson would sell more guitars if...

Discussion in 'Guitars in General' started by p.mo, May 9, 2019.

  1. JDutch

    JDutch Member

    Messages:
    1,924
    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Not a good idea.
     
  2. Jon Silberman

    Jon Silberman 10Q Jerry & Dickey Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    39,329
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    Location:
    Northern VA
    Thanks. I’m guessing 8 1/2 lbs. I’ll try to weigh it later.
     
    biffoz likes this.
  3. JPH118

    JPH118 Member

    Messages:
    1,677
    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Location:
    NJ/NYC

    This is correct... it was the Norlin company who purchased Gibson in 1969 that sent Epiphone overseas. In the earlier 60s, Epiphone was every bit as good as Gibson... my 66 Casino and 67 ES330 were from the same assembly line and should be nearly identical, but the Epi is actually a bit nicer!
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2019
  4. Tom Fontaine

    Tom Fontaine Member

    Messages:
    114
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2019
    I can’t imagine changing the headstock on a couple models would propel Epiphone a past Gibson’s. It’s just the les Paul and SG anyway right? They already match headstocks on explorers, Vs, thunderbirds. And a quick scan of reverb has MIJ Gibson shaped headstock epis listed at right around $1000. I can get a Gibson les Paul for less.
     
  5. jwguitar

    jwguitar Supporting Member

    Messages:
    4,929
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Unfortunately I think it would cheapen the Gibson brand by doing that. Also, the Epiphone brand does have some unique models of their own like the Broadway and Sheraton. I think its good to separate the two. It can get a bit convoluted when they had the Epiphone Elite line. Those were Japanese models that were as good or better than many of the Gibson's for a lower price.
     
    uab9253 likes this.
  6. steve_man

    steve_man Member

    Messages:
    2,210
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Location:
    New Mexico
    If they sold Fenders...
     
  7. Goldie Glocks

    Goldie Glocks Member

    Messages:
    661
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2019
    Perhaps I have missed something along the way but Gibson is the parent of Epiphone. Hence when Epiphone sells guitars, Gibson makes money.

    Epiphone is to Gibson what Squire is to Fender
     
  8. HERSCHEL

    HERSCHEL Member

    Messages:
    4,370
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2017
    I don't have an issue with the Epiphone headstock. The bound one on the Les Paul Custom looks great, the non-bound is a bit bland but it's a functional headstock. There are also no wing tips to get dinged, for those who like pristine guitars. It looks better than the Telecaster flaccid wang, and that one is functional too. Headstock outrage is pretty much an internet goober issue, not so much a real world issue.
     
  9. Ferg Deluxe

    Ferg Deluxe Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,603
    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Location:
    Baltimore
    No one is disputing anything you said. Actually, it's fairly obvious. The question is whether the Gibson company -- which includes Epi -- would sell more guitars overall if they changed up the branding. I personally don't really care one way or another.

    And it's entirely possible that Gibson doesn't want to increase volume at this time.
     
  10. billboneys

    billboneys Supporting Member

    Messages:
    555
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Preach!
     
    Penguinchit and steve_man like this.
  11. Ferg Deluxe

    Ferg Deluxe Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,603
    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Location:
    Baltimore
    I don't see why people lose their minds over the Epiphone shape, it's not terrible. The Epi is not my favorite shape ever, but then again neither is the Gibby. I suppose they're both simply okay
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2019
    uab9253, Penguinchit, Rufus and 2 others like this.
  12. BEACHBUM

    BEACHBUM Member

    Messages:
    2,641
    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    Location:
    Sand Land
    Gibson and us would be a lot better off if they'd stop cutting corners and doing crap lacquer finishes on their mid to lower priced guitars. Orange peal and grain suck all over the guitar just doesn't cut it. If they're not going to do them right then they should just go to poly and have done with it.
     
    exactopposite likes this.
  13. BEACHBUM

    BEACHBUM Member

    Messages:
    2,641
    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    Location:
    Sand Land
    It's not about the shape. It's about the bragging rights.
     
  14. COYS

    COYS Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,567
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2016
    The Epiphone headstock has rounded corners on the top, which makes it "hideous", while the Gibson headstock has pointy corners on the top, which makes it "correct".
     
    Hot In The Shade and KHAN like this.
  15. TopJimmy5150

    TopJimmy5150 Member

    Messages:
    1,210
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    I like them the way they are. Keep the imports in the Epiphone line.

    I like having the choice between a top of the line Epi or a low end Gibby for the same money.
     
  16. COYS

    COYS Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,567
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2016
    I think they'd sell more if they used the same headstock shape because people would buy them to put fake Gibson logos on them. No question about that. It's no wonder why they use a slightly different shape for Epiphone, and one that can't easily be converted into the Gibson shape.

    And for the set that is too worried that people might see them with "Epiphone" written on their headstock and judge them, they could then tell themselves that most people won't even know that it's not a real Gibson.

    For Gibson, keeping Epiphone separate keeps from diluting their brand image, just like Fender keeping Squier separate does. Fender of course differentiates at a lower price point, but Gibson has chosen to position themselves so that every Gibson guitar is made in the USA. Historically, it has served them fine.

    Gibson is doing well. Their new line is great and getting a great reception, and they've lost the dead weight parts of the business and the dead weight leading the business that were the source of their troubles. They don't need to change anything WRT Epiphone
     
    magnus02 likes this.
  17. Guitarworks

    Guitarworks Member

    Messages:
    9,078
    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Gibson sells more Epiphone branded products than Gibson branded products. Epiphone has kept Gibson afloat during every recession.
     
    HERSCHEL likes this.
  18. Da Geezer

    Da Geezer Supporting Member

    Messages:
    4,781
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Location:
    Shen-VA-lley
    If they completely switched to THAT headstock with the bikini badge, I believe it would be a tremendous step in selling more Epi guitars!
    :love:
     
    Imerkat likes this.
  19. Ferg Deluxe

    Ferg Deluxe Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,603
    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Location:
    Baltimore
    There's an awful lot of people referencing the shape specifically. Even saying Epi should change the shape and keep the Epi name. That tells me it's about the shape more than the name.

    Again, I have no dog in this fight. I'm just surprised that so many dislike the shape in comparison to the USA Gibson shape. It's not like we're talking about James Tyler headstocks here! :D
     
  20. boppy

    boppy Member

    Messages:
    487
    Joined:
    May 26, 2012
    Location:
    Toronto
    To answer the original question...

    I think Gibson would sell more guitars if they brought back the Midtown line for all models.

    As for Epiphones, I only have one right now; The John Lennon EJ160E. It's just okay, and I've had and have much better. The headstock doesn't bother me in the least.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice