Gibsons personal inspecton photo is FAKE!

Discussion in 'Guitars in General' started by DrainBamage, Sep 21, 2017.

  1. Whitecat

    Whitecat Member

    Messages:
    1,479
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2013
    ENHANCE
     
    cj_wattage likes this.
  2. 70' s Tone

    70' s Tone Member

    Messages:
    2,589
    Joined:
    May 30, 2017
    Why do all the cops in my neighborhood look different, especially the females? Must be the geographic location.
     
  3. hunter

    hunter Supporting Member

    Messages:
    5,247
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2002
    Maybe it will become a bargaining piece too? I, for one, never imagined anyone would attempt to attach a value of $200 or $300 to a COA, which is no more meaningful than a picture to many. Yet it is, as you point out, the COA used as a bargaining piece and the valuation is typically in that ballpark. To paraphrase, the sooner you learn how to evaluate a guitar on your own...

    Who can say the picture won't get used the same way.

    BTW, I have to believe you understand the parallel but I am going along with it.

    hunter
     
    Jabberwocky likes this.
  4. Herb Utsmelz

    Herb Utsmelz 'Tis what 'tis Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,969
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Location:
    Where the wild things are...
    A COA simply denotes it was built by an upper echelon division and is used as a forgery deterrent. It has value because it's part of the "package" unique to the specific guitar and there is less unknown as far as it being truly a higher dollar piece on the second market if the COA is present. Two of the 3 pictures in this thread don't even have any type of identifier to the guitar and it looks like the tag example in the OP was a mistake that happened to have a different inspection tag sitting on the bench. They're useless and seemingly interchangeable, especially in the case of a guitar that doesn't have any visual cues (like a solid black SG) . And to think it denotes better QC is just wishful thinking. We all know it could just as easily come off the line, lay on the bench for a picture, and go right into the case. It could be used a bargaining piece since essentially anything can be nit picked, but it's not the case and most likely never will be as significant as a COA for Gibson. Or Fender. Or other limited edition guitars. Or sports memorabilia. Or cars.
     
    xzacx likes this.
  5. hunter

    hunter Supporting Member

    Messages:
    5,247
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2002
    Oh yeah it is total BS, just like the COA.

    hunter
     
    Jabberwocky likes this.
  6. 73Fender

    73Fender Member

    Messages:
    3,978
    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2010
    Location:
    NJ
    The COA is just one more thing to help establish authenticity and can be a bargaining tool if missing and I guess it is a marketing tool too. Obviously not fool proof but not BS either. This shop picture thing I suppose is also a little extra marketing touch but if it even takes a second from any kind of QC eval or set up then it is counter productive.
     
    Starshine and Herb Utsmelz like this.
  7. Herb Utsmelz

    Herb Utsmelz 'Tis what 'tis Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,969
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Location:
    Where the wild things are...
    At least a missing COA doesn't destroy most of the value as if it were a limited car build that could otherwise be a clone. Or even completely useless like a signature or some sort of game-used sports item.
     
  8. DrainBamage

    DrainBamage Member

    Messages:
    2,370
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2011
    \
    Yes but in that case the serial number wouldn't match the headstock to the certification paperwork. Mine match.
    That would be a huge screw up!
     
  9. stratamania

    stratamania Member

    Messages:
    3,134
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2012
    Location:
    UK and Europe
    Then just contact Gibson, and ask them about it.
     
  10. DrainBamage

    DrainBamage Member

    Messages:
    2,370
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2011
    Where have you come to the conclusion I think the photo means anything?!?

    This tread took 10 minutes to make. I had a hunch Gibson doesn't actually take a photo of said guitar. I was right in this case.

    Why is it so hard for folks here to get there head around! Have some fun and lighten up fellas.
     
  11. Herb Utsmelz

    Herb Utsmelz 'Tis what 'tis Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,969
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Location:
    Where the wild things are...
    You yourself said “it’s a sign of quality control or it’s supposed to be”.
     
    TexasGuitar likes this.
  12. DrainBamage

    DrainBamage Member

    Messages:
    2,370
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2011
    After all the backlash that quote was in the context of why Gibson adds the photos.. or one would assume.

    But its ok, the majority of folks here think the inclusion of a stock photo isn't dishonest.
     
  13. guitarnut_1

    guitarnut_1 Member

    Messages:
    1,983
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
  14. daveyrocks

    daveyrocks Member

    Messages:
    92
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2016
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    I can confirm they do take photos of the actual guitar, and not for a good reason.

    Gibson once sent my store a les paul STANDARD with a les paul "Traditional" inscribed truss rod bell cover.

    we had to swap the bell before someone bought it.

    and guess what was in the photo... the same guitar with a "traditional" bell cover. not only did Gibson not notice that they'd fitted the wrong cover to the truss rod, they took and printed a photo of it and still didn't notice their mistake haha.
     
  15. seward

    seward Member

    Messages:
    622
    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Srs?
     
  16. Gurn

    Gurn Member

    Messages:
    991
    Joined:
    May 18, 2012
    Location:
    Either Gulf Coast or SE Asia
    There is a pattern here. If only we could discern it.

    It could be H-U-G-E in a big, big, big way....Bigly H-U-G-E.
    If only we could see through the fog of facts.

    Clues are right there - slapping us in the face. The inspector's name on the card starts with a D. But the inspector's name on bench starts with J. There must be 2 inspectors? Or is there only one...wearing a disguise? Is one of them...or everyone on Gibson's QC team a shape-shifter? Or is it a problem with the management team? Are they alien-human hybrids sabotaging QC inspection cards? Is there a secret war between QC and management? Aliens versus shape-shifters?

    We know the Peavey amp is in disguise. But why? Was OP's guitar in the Peavey factory all the time? Is Henry J. secretly selling us Peaveys disguised as Gibsons?

     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2017
  17. Brad8008135

    Brad8008135 Member

    Messages:
    1,893
    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2015
    Location:
    Down on Peachtree Street
    Serious as the day is long. This is becoming an epidemic of guitar proportions. I will drive up to Nashville Monday and demand satisfaction.

    See that hammer in the photo? Gibson uses it to beat the guitars into submission. Otherwise they'd feed back in fear.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2017
    Dr Bonkers and handyman like this.
  18. handyman

    handyman Member

    Messages:
    931
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    But it proves that the guitar, or one just like it, was on a bench once. What does that prove, and why should I care? Heck if I know. :confused:
     
    Herb Utsmelz likes this.
  19. Jabberwocky

    Jabberwocky Member

    Messages:
    869
    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Location:
    'Tis safer under the bridge.
    Two rounds of inspection. One on the bench. The other just before it is packed.

    That was simple but we prefer the conspiratorial one.
     
    Gurn likes this.
  20. xzacx

    xzacx Member

    Messages:
    1,284
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2014
    There’s no more proof that you were right than there is that it was just another guitar’s card left in the frame. As has been pointed out already, there are other pics which have no card in them at all. I don’t know how one can decuct that you’re right or wrong based on the available info.
     
    Jabberwocky likes this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice