Hagstrom Guitars

Discussion in 'Guitars in General' started by benjammin420, Feb 24, 2009.

  1. benjammin420

    benjammin420 Member

    Messages:
    1,565
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    I've been playing a few different Hagstroms lately, and I've decided I want to make my next guitar a hag (swede or viking). I really like the tone, feel and pricetag. But more than once ive fallen for a guitar, bought it, played it for months then grew out of it, or realized it sucked. Any of you who own (or have owned) a Hagstrom, what do you like/dislike about them?
     
  2. Lex Luthier

    Lex Luthier Member

    Messages:
    1,761
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Location:
    3rd stone from the sun
    New ones or old ones? My brother picked up a early 70's Swede and it is a pretty nice guitar. The only issues were the almost fretless wonder sized frets and the pickups are on the weak side, maybe sounding a little more like a Filtertron than a PAF.
     
  3. benjammin420

    benjammin420 Member

    Messages:
    1,565
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    new ones. yeah, i was thinking of swapping the p-ups for something beefier. Im curious though if they fall apart after 5 years or something
     
  4. Lex Luthier

    Lex Luthier Member

    Messages:
    1,761
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Location:
    3rd stone from the sun
    I doubt they would fall apart. A friend of mine is a new Hagstrom dealer, I've tried a bunch and they seem pretty nice. He has a sawed in half new Hagstrom neck to show the truss rod, they use the same style rod as the originals.
     
  5. thirstypirate

    thirstypirate Member

    Messages:
    451
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Location:
    San Diego
    I have a new Hag Viking Dlx. I the pickups don't sound like Gibson's but they have a cool tone of their own. I feel no need to swap them out. The neck is the best part. It plays fast and feels great. I don't know what the big deal is about the H-expander truss rod and would be thankful if someone would fill me in.

    I looks great too for a guitar in it's price range. This pic kind of sucks but I don't have a camera right now to take a better one.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. benjammin420

    benjammin420 Member

    Messages:
    1,565
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    i think its called an "H expander" because the profile looks like an H laying on its side, which makes it more stable. I did like the tone of the p-ups, but i ABed a swede with a les paul and thought the LP had more growl, which i like. though if i go with a viking i may decide to leave it stock.
     
  7. Redbell

    Redbell Member

    Messages:
    1,392
    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Location:
    Hoosier
    "But more than once ive fallen for a guitar, bought it, played it for months then grew out of it, or realized it sucked."

    I think we can all relate to that one!
     
  8. Jim85IROC

    Jim85IROC Member

    Messages:
    995
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    I played a Viking but I never plugged it in. I found that it played very well and resonated better than some of the other 335-style guitars that I played. Overall, I found the Ibanez AS73 to play just as well, and was a lot less expensive. Ultimately I bought an Xaviere XV-900. The fretwork on the XV-900 sucks (they need to be recrowned), but the XV-900 is highly resonant and has great pickups.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice