How are Gibson 335s from the 70's?

Discussion in 'Guitars in General' started by pickslide, Jan 12, 2008.


  1. pickslide

    pickslide Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,420
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Location:
    Alberta, Canada
    I always hear that Les Pauls from the 70's can be really iffy, so how are 335s, 345s, 339s, ect...
     
  2. dharmafool

    dharmafool Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,055
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    The thinlines are even more iffy than the LPs, and that's putting it kindly.
     
  3. johnzias

    johnzias Member

    Messages:
    856
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2007
    Location:
    Tampa Bay Area
    Crap IMO. I guess that's putting it bluntly! :)
     
  4. pickslide

    pickslide Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,420
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Location:
    Alberta, Canada
    Hmmm no beating around the bush here....I like that.

    Why are they so bad?

    How about the onese from the 80's?
     
  5. gadzooka

    gadzooka Member

    Messages:
    507
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Location:
    NJ
    Early 80's ES-335DOT models are very well-made. There's an '82 for sale near me that's very tempting.

    I had a '71 ES-355 that was very bland in tone. Then again, I tried out a '74 ES-345 that seemed to really sing.

    1970's ES guitars seem quite a bit different than any others. The specs were unique to those years. I believe center block became two separate blocks at either end of the body, one maple, the other mahogany. The neck tenon became very short, ending before the end of the fretboard (the main reason I'd be wary of 70's ESs). The pickups...may have changed a couple times too...I'm not too sure. The neck became 3-piece maple. Not all of these changes are absolutely negative (shortening the tenon is, IMO).
     

Share This Page