I'm considering commissioning a Tele-type within a few months. In the case of a guitar based on the common shapes (Strat, Tele, 335, LP), there are a number of builders who can make what you want. However, there are challenges to picking the builder.
With small builder guitars, it is hard to find an example in person. Most of the names out there have excellent reviews across the board (both for the quality of guitar and their customer service), and often times there are few people who have played guitars from both maker A and maker B. You get a lot of satisfied owners, but few comparative reviews. Price is certainly a consideration, but for a given guitar type, it seems that many builders are clustered around similar price points, which makes sense.
I'm not asking who I should pick; rather, I am asking how you chose the builder to make your guitar (in a situation where multiple options were available, not some proprietary/unique design). In a certain sense it seems like you can't go wrong with many of the top names, but it also makes the choice difficult!
With small builder guitars, it is hard to find an example in person. Most of the names out there have excellent reviews across the board (both for the quality of guitar and their customer service), and often times there are few people who have played guitars from both maker A and maker B. You get a lot of satisfied owners, but few comparative reviews. Price is certainly a consideration, but for a given guitar type, it seems that many builders are clustered around similar price points, which makes sense.
I'm not asking who I should pick; rather, I am asking how you chose the builder to make your guitar (in a situation where multiple options were available, not some proprietary/unique design). In a certain sense it seems like you can't go wrong with many of the top names, but it also makes the choice difficult!