I can't choose! Silverface Twin Reverb or '03 Super Reverb!?!

Discussion in 'Amps and Cabs' started by spiffyroutine, Mar 25, 2008.

  1. spiffyroutine

    spiffyroutine Member

    Messages:
    9
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    So I'm being offered some killer deals on both of these amps, but I don't know which one to get!

    Which would you choose: The silverface 100-watt twin reverb with the master volume, or the 40-watt '03 super reverb reissue?

    At the moment I have a '55 Tremolux, but it's only 15-watts, so I need something beefier.

    Street smarts, are of course, appreciated!
     
  2. ReddRanger

    ReddRanger Member

    Messages:
    3,044
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    I'm sure people will chime on the value aspects of a silverface compared to RI, which is not my specialty.

    But if it comes to down to just gigging usability, I would have more use for the Super Reverb. The 100w Twin would be overkill for my needs. In general, I prefer Supers over Twins anyhow.

    Just my .02
     
  3. Unburst

    Unburst Member

    Messages:
    4,221
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Does the Twin have the pull boost on the MV?

    If yes then I'd get the Super.

    In fact I'd probably get the Super anyway :D
     
  4. BadHat

    BadHat Supporting Member

    Messages:
    5,402
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Location:
    Port Awful, TX.
    That Twin has all the classic clean tones in it. I have a SRRI and a silverface Vibrosonic Reverb which is basically a Twin with a 15 inch speaker, there's no comparing the two. The Vibro is just about the nicest tone I've ever experienced from my fingers, and that Super ain't really a bargain to lug around either with those 4 speakers in it.
     
  5. davess23

    davess23 Member

    Messages:
    5,809
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Location:
    Swampscott, MA
    If really clean and really loud is your deal, get the Twin.

    If sweet breakup when cranked, and plenty loud enough, just not to the point of bleeding eardrums, is you, then get the Super.
     
  6. BadHat

    BadHat Supporting Member

    Messages:
    5,402
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Location:
    Port Awful, TX.
    I hear a lot of people talking about how ****** the pull boost is, I just don't use it, the amp sounds totally killer. It doesn't really give you any breakup anyway.
     
  7. spiffyroutine

    spiffyroutine Member

    Messages:
    9
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Just a quick note - the offers are $650 for the Twin, and $750 for the Super, if that has any correlation as to which one I should get.

    Also, would you say it'd be crazy of me to offer a trade: my '55 Tremolux (but not in the original cab) for both amps?
     
  8. BadHat

    BadHat Supporting Member

    Messages:
    5,402
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Location:
    Port Awful, TX.
    I wouldn't do a trade, just get the Twin and keep the Tremolux. You can always pick up one of those Supers anywhere.
     
  9. spiffyroutine

    spiffyroutine Member

    Messages:
    9
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Man - so many strong opinions on both sides! Any arguments to tip the balance?

    I'm leaning towards the Twin at this point.
     
  10. soldano16

    soldano16 Member

    Messages:
    2,348
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Location:
    British Columbia
    And you can always find a SF twin, even one without a master volume, for cheap. The amp that used to rule the world doesn't seem to be all that desirable these days. And TONS of them were made.
     
  11. Tag

    Tag Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    32,387
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2002
    Location:
    New Jersey

    SRRI. One of the best sounding amps you can buy at any price.
     
  12. BadHat

    BadHat Supporting Member

    Messages:
    5,402
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Location:
    Port Awful, TX.
    well, everyone has an opinion. I have both, they are both great amps.
    I prefer the Twin(Vibrosonic)
    I had to change out the Jensens in the Super, they were too farty at high volumes.
    I never found it to have a whole lot of breakup, not till I put the Fat Boost in front and cranked the amp, then it sounded incredible, but it was crazy loud by then.
     
  13. joel98z

    joel98z Member

    Messages:
    567
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    +1 Agreed!
     
  14. burner

    burner Member

    Messages:
    2,614
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Location:
    USA

    Given that I just had two brand new Twin Reverb Reissues go tits up straight outta' the box, I'd put my vote of confidence in the SF Twin,no question.
    They can also be excellent platforms for mods if you are so inclined.
     
  15. DejavuDave

    DejavuDave Member

    Messages:
    1,814
    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Location:
    So Cal
    Take the Super RI. They're plenty loud. This from a Twin-lover. :AOK
     
  16. Captain Midnite

    Captain Midnite Member

    Messages:
    1,801
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Location:
    MI, USA
    Snobs like to diss MV Twins, I have two and love'em for steel and Tele. Of course, they are for loud clean sounds. If you want tube distortion, get the Super. Either way you'll be REALLY LOUD!
     
  17. spiffyroutine

    spiffyroutine Member

    Messages:
    9
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    So it seems like Super Votes - 4, Twin Votes - 2

    But man: good arguments on both sides - kind of makes it troublesome!

    I suppose I'm just going to have to figure it out through playing each when I see them next week.

    I guess I'm just curious as to how clean the Super Reverb is, and how loud it can get staying clean. I too think the Twin's 100w is overkill for the kind of venues I'd use it in.
     

Share This Page