Maybe the Mark V will bebetter , but I dont understand an amp design that kinda requires the amp to have the Graphic eq to make it sound good.
I would understand something like a Bogner xtc, Marshall Plexi, or some other allready killer sounding amp by itself having a built in Graphic eq for fine tuning, but the Mark sounds like crap with out the graphic eq. The Mark Series are just too darn boxy and have a midrange thats not warm and pleasant at all but more horrid. I have to agree though with the Graphic EQ the amp sounds incredible, but why would it be designed this way? The Graphic eq is there for more of the initial tone setting opposed to fine tunning the way I would think it would be.
anyway, I am one of those dumb asses who stupidly bought a Mark III with no graphic eq and has to use an external eq to get to sound right.
I would understand something like a Bogner xtc, Marshall Plexi, or some other allready killer sounding amp by itself having a built in Graphic eq for fine tuning, but the Mark sounds like crap with out the graphic eq. The Mark Series are just too darn boxy and have a midrange thats not warm and pleasant at all but more horrid. I have to agree though with the Graphic EQ the amp sounds incredible, but why would it be designed this way? The Graphic eq is there for more of the initial tone setting opposed to fine tunning the way I would think it would be.
anyway, I am one of those dumb asses who stupidly bought a Mark III with no graphic eq and has to use an external eq to get to sound right.