Is It Possible to Make a "stealth" Esquire that Sounds Great?

Discussion in 'Guitars in General' started by dhdfoster, Jan 12, 2008.


  1. dhdfoster

    dhdfoster Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    10,553
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2006
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    I know John English made 100 or so of these with the "stealth" neck pickup, but I've never heerd one.

    I'm not looking to do this, but I wonder if one of the really good pickup gurus like Lollar, Fralin, DonM, Stephens Design, or Novak could design a Tele neck pickup that sits under the guard, but still sounds great and matches well with the bridge pup.

    I'm just sort of curious, as I bet it would be somewhat popular. Esquires look fantastic, but I really like the Tele neck pup sound.
     
  2. VaughnC

    VaughnC Supporting Member

    Messages:
    14,164
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Probably not possible because the magnetic field of any stealth neck pickup would still come in contact with the strings...and it's mainly the magnetic interference from the neck pickup that tonally differentiates a Tele from an Esquire.
     
  3. DrBob

    DrBob Member

    Messages:
    428
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Location:
    Sutton, Surrey, England
    Didn't Bill Nash do something similar ?
    His solution was to put the neck into the body at an angle (Gibson style) as opposed to the usual parallel Fender way.
    By doing that the strings pass close enough to the body at the neck pickup position to allow the pickup to be hidden under the plate whist the Bridge/Bridge P/U sit at the normal height.
    Is that the same as the John English model ?
     
  4. dhdfoster

    dhdfoster Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    10,553
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2006
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    Absolutely. I meant more to get the clean look of an Esquire, not the identical tone.

    If you wanted the pickup to "hear" the strings without pulling on them at all, the pup would probably have to be so microphonic, it'd be unusable, I think.
     
  5. Mike9

    Mike9 Supporting Member

    Messages:
    9,971
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Location:
    Ghent, NY
    I'm considering a Duncan Quarter Pound neck pickup - they are quite powerful.
     
  6. bluesjuke

    bluesjuke Disrespected Elder Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    24,126
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Location:
    Gretchen's House, Bluesland, TX.
    For a 'Stealth" Esquire?
     
  7. Pete Galati

    Pete Galati Member

    Messages:
    1,685
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Paint your neck pickup flat black so it'll blend in with your pickguard!

    IMO, a good bright humbucker pickup would be far better suited for hiding under a pickguard.
     
  8. illinimax

    illinimax Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,574
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2002
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    Harmonic Design sells tele pickups to match your pickguard for that esquire look. To top it off they're the best sounding tele neck pickups I have in my guitars.
     
  9. walterw

    walterw Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    31,535
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    exactly. since it's going to be so far away from the strings, powerful magnets and high output are in order. even a monster like the dimarzio x2n humbucker can balance ok with a tele bridge pickup.
     
  10. 59GIBSON

    59GIBSON Member

    Messages:
    221
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Location:
    NEW YORK
    I bought one of these English "stealth" esquire as IMHO it was as close to owning a real 52/53 esquire as I'll ever get. As a esquire it's a GREAT sounding guitar but I found the "stealth pups" weak and very generic sounding. The guitar left the factory with the bridge pup too far away from the strings in order to calibrate it with the stealth pups. Once I raised up the bridge pup the guitar became alive. However now the bridge pup was too over-bearing to use with the stealth pups. I wound up taking out the stealth pups and replacing the harness with a vintage replica harness from Callaham. The guitar "IMHO" now sounds as good as any 50s esquire I've played. If I EVER sell it, I can simply re-store it to the way it left the factory.
    [​IMG]
     
  11. dhdfoster

    dhdfoster Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    10,553
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2006
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    Yes, that's what I suspected. I guess I'm just wondering if a great pickup maker were to put their mind to designing an under the guard neck pup, if it would even be possible to get great results.
     
  12. John Phillips

    John Phillips Member

    Messages:
    13,080
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Location:
    Scotland
    I did one many years ago with an early Japanese Esquire reissue and a Seymour Duncan Hot Strat pickup. The pickup fits in the cavity - just - without routing when screwed down directly onto the floor of it, although I had to remove the wires from passing through the baseplate, and very slightly scrape the underside of the guard to get it to sit flat over the polepieces.

    It sounded very good - with the pickup that far from the strings it didn't have the 'overwound' sound that model normally has in a Strat, and it might not even have pulled as much on the strings. It did actually sound fairly close to a Tele neck pickup.
     
  13. JimH

    JimH Member

    Messages:
    1,572
    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    Played one and this was pretty much my experience. The esquire elements were fine - not my cuppa tea neck-wise but that's a different issue. I hate to say this but the other pup selections just sounded like a weak/generic fender guitar. Not even particularly tele. Like a squire strat even, that indistinct. I can't decide whether I like the whole business or not - I mean why pretend you've not got pickups you have got? It seems like you're buying into the whole - simple is better, 50s is better, I only need the basics type vibe and then it being fake - then on other days I think it's cool - but that's just a matter of taste and not what this discussion's about. For me the sonic result wasn't good enough.

    Whether it's possible or not is difficult to say. There's the artificial barrier of having the pickups a minimum (and large) distance away from the strings - not a constraint that anyone's had to get round before. What's the solution? super hot pups? Would they have great tone? hard to say.
     

Share This Page