Is the Boss TU-3 tuner a good buffer?

Discussion in 'Effects, Pedals, Strings & Things' started by jackroylee, Feb 12, 2012.

  1. jackroylee

    jackroylee Member

    Messages:
    286
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    I will put it at the first spot of my chain, can it become a good buffer and tuner at the same time?

    Thank you!
     
  2. Marrrty

    Marrrty Member

    Messages:
    507
    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Location:
    Fremantle, Western Australia
    I think the buffers in the whole Boss line up are pretty acceptable
     
    hippieboy likes this.
  3. jackroylee

    jackroylee Member

    Messages:
    286
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Thank you ,but I am still not sure if the TU-3 has a good buffer in it,cause I heard some people say the TU-2's buffer is not good and suck lots of tone.
     
  4. chervokas

    chervokas Member

    Messages:
    6,864
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2008
    Personally I've never heard a problem with the TU-2 buffer. Never used a TU-3 and I haven't seen a schematic on either.

    I don't use the tuner anymore because I found the Turbo Tuner to be a better tuner, and now that I'm using a small board I've gone buffer-less. But I don't think it's even accurate to say a buffer causes "tone suck." That phrase was invented to describe the frequency balance and signal level changes that happen when a hardwire bypass pedal with a low input impedance loads down the guitar. Both true bypass and buffered bypass switching schemes are solutions for tone suck.

    Yes, it's true, some buffered bypass schemes might depart from perfect linearity more than others, some might be truely unity gain some might be slightly less than unity gain, and some switching schemes might have something else going on besides buffering -- like some of the Boss pedals that mix wet and dry signals have not only buffers but also pre and de emphasis eq at the front and back of the pedal circuit that might affect tone. And no buffer is going to sound exactly like your direct in tone although some buffers try to develop workaround to replicate an amp front end -- like the valuvlator which has a tube preamp stage ahead of a buffer. So, it's not like all devices used as buffers in guitar signal chains are identical. But like I said, I never heard too much of a problem with a TU-2 buffer nor have I heard much if any difference between any of the commonly available BJT or JFET buffer circuits other than differences that arise from their differing input impedances.
     
    hippieboy likes this.
  5. jackroylee

    jackroylee Member

    Messages:
    286
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Thanks alot,buddy :)
     
  6. giantrobotswinbig

    giantrobotswinbig Member

    Messages:
    292
    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Location:
    Olympia, WA
    I didn't care for the TU-3 buffer because it changed the EQ of my guitar signal, making it thin-soundingbin a way that some of the other buffers I have tried did not. YMMV!
     
  7. LouRossi

    LouRossi Member

    Messages:
    2,038
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    same here. returned it and still use the tu-2 but at the end of the chain
     
  8. jpervin

    jpervin Member

    Messages:
    6,839
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2005
    Location:
    Frazer, PA
    Same here. I notice no signal degradation with the TU-2 at the end of the chain.
     
  9. Soul Man

    Soul Man Local 83 Supporting Member

    Messages:
    2,352
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Location:
    926 E McLemore Ave
    So......tuner last instead of first?

    What are the benefits of chaining it this way?
     
  10. tdk8709

    tdk8709 Senior Member

    Messages:
    961
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Location:
    Southern Illinois
    Never tried the 3, but the TU-2 buffer is solid. I noticed no difference in tone between it and the JHS, so I kept the one that covered two bases.
     
  11. Floyd Eye

    Floyd Eye Member

    Messages:
    12,766
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2011
    Location:
    St. Louis, Mo.
    TU2 first in the chain. No tone loss. Last in the chain kinda makes it useless as a buffer.
     
    hippieboy likes this.
  12. Waxhead

    Waxhead Member

    Messages:
    5,557
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Location:
    Surfin at Merewether Point, NSW Australia
    hehehehe the TU-2 like many Boss pedals has a poor quality buffer.
    The proof of this are the millions of people complaining over the years about it's tone sucking and where to place this dog of a thing to avoid it.
    I wouldn't trust a TU-3 either.
    Not very accurate or fast & there's about 5 better pedal tuners available these days :huh
     
  13. chervokas

    chervokas Member

    Messages:
    6,864
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2008
    What about the millions of people who say they hear no sonic degradation? Neither is proof of anything. Both are just opinions.
     
    hippieboy and GregDorsen like this.
  14. tdk8709

    tdk8709 Senior Member

    Messages:
    961
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Location:
    Southern Illinois
    The proof is all the people complaining about it? Groups of people complain about almost every pedal on the market. That only proves that a particular group of people don't like it for whatever their reason is.
     
  15. chervokas

    chervokas Member

    Messages:
    6,864
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2008
    Right, you want any kind of empirical proof you kinda need to look for waveform distortions by comparing the input and output signals on a 'scope or something.
     
    hippieboy likes this.
  16. semi-hollowbody

    semi-hollowbody Member

    Messages:
    17,477
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Location:
    Metro Detroit Burbs, MI
    My tuner (tu-3) is in a looper...never in the chain unless I need to tune up

    I have had the tu3 and my old tu2 in the beginning, the end, the middle of the chain...as long as they werent in the tuner out of my volume pedal, these boss pedals never sucked tone...at the beginning they did exactly what a buffer should do imo...boss has solid buffers in their pedals
     
  17. Jesus freak

    Jesus freak Supporting Member

    Messages:
    2,620
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Location:
    KY
  18. tdk8709

    tdk8709 Senior Member

    Messages:
    961
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Location:
    Southern Illinois
    Some people just have it in their heads that all boss pedals cause "time suck" and this effects what they allow their ears to hear. It is compounded by the excellent marketing of dedicated buffer manufacturers.
     
    hippieboy likes this.
  19. Chiba

    Chiba Gold Supporting Member

    Messages:
    7,816
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2002
    Location:
    State of Denial
    I've been using a TU-2 for *years* and never had a single problem or issue with its buffer. For a long time it was the only tuner I trusted enough to use in the studio.

    You know what they say, opinions are like assholes.
     
    hippieboy likes this.
  20. guitarslinger21

    guitarslinger21 Member

    Messages:
    6,506
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Location:
    F Dub, USA
    The TU-3 has a perfectly acceptable buffer, and it's designed to be used early in the chain.

    Why on Earth would one want to use it later in the chain? Wouldn't the harmonic content, delay, and modulation of the other pedals affect one's tuning? Also, in my experience, a buffer at the end of the chain is much less necessary than a buffer at the beginning of the chain.
     
    hippieboy likes this.

Share This Page