- Messages
- 3,237
The guitar in question is a Larrivee D-03 (spruce/mahogany dreadnought). There is no opportunity to play either before buying. Is there any benefit to buying the older broken in guitar other than a reasonable price difference?
Buying used guitars is like buying used anything. It doesn't matter if it's guitars, houses, or cars, if you know what you're doing it will always produce the best prices. Knowing what you're doing means knowing current pricing including MSRP, street, used street, and the wholesale ranges; basic maintenance and repair practices or have access to them; and be able to rate the condition and function accurately. The last one is a skill that takes some time to learn because it isn't just good, better, best.
Warranty: When it comes to most things, they either built it right or they didn't. If it's used it's had some time to exist in the world. If the guitar is right, it's right and a warranty is superfluous. If the guitar (car, house, major appliance, doo dad, gee gaw) isn't right, don't buy it. Unless you have the skills to repair it, access to the parts, and can buy for a price that allows you to pay yourself for your time just walk away.
Thanks. All of this makes sense because (1) the used guitar is more than a few years old, going back to the Larrivee clear pickguard days, which I prefer; and (2) the Larrivee factory in Oxnard is 15 miles from my office.Don't know if it's been mentioned, but the majority of guitars that develop issues with wood warping, twisting cracks, etc, happen within the first few years for obvious reasons. So buying a guitar thats a few years old is IMO a safer bet. Chances are very good you'll never need it tho if you buy a 8 or 10 year old guitar. Plus you get the advantage of any positive tonal changes that happen in the first few years which can be considerable, and if it goes the opposite way you'll know that when you demo it. All in all i feel it's very advantageous. The only negative i see is if the warranty isn't transferable. But for several reasons i don't put a lot of stock in warranties, but thats your call. Assuming of course there IS one since if it's not lifetime chances are it's over anyways.
Except that the Larrivee fits the sweet spot between the booming M and the trebly T. In my example the used is 80% of the cost of the new.With a Larry it would be much better to go used as they do not hold their value like a Taylor or Martin.
With a Gibby, Taylor, or Martin...no big deal to buy new, they hold their value so well, the warranty is worth it,
The used guitar is listed for sale for 80% of the price for which the new guitar is advertised for sale.Eighty percent of MSRP or of new street?