Really Gibson? Stop making a guitar that looks nothing like their precious V, .......that was produced ..
NINE YEARS prior to their patent! And again, wouldn't apply anyway since they look totally different!
Really Gibson? Stop making a guitar that looks nothing like their precious V, .......that was produced ..
NINE YEARS prior to their patent! And again, wouldn't apply anyway since they look totally different!
This whole thing is so funny to me. If Gibson took 1/4th of the money they waste on all this frivolous nonsense and sunk that into making quality guitars, they wouldn't be in this position and wouldn't have to pad their pockets by bullying other companies with ridiculous reaching lawsuits and threats. But they're not going to do that, which is why they'll remain a laughing stock among guitar players for years to come.
I mean their excuse with the Firebird X crushing incident was that they didn't live up to their QC. How in the hell are they making that many guitars that don't pass QC?
When JC was at Levi’s they sued anyone with their name/logo on a cloth tab on a denim garment.
These guitar shape lawsuits seem almost reasonable compared to his days at Levi’s.
If you have to ask that question with a hint of surprise, I'm guessing you haven't played any Gibsons made in the last 15 years or so.
I have. And even with my limited sample set its appalling how many of them have issues. From terrible fretwork to finish issues to an SG with a dead neck pickup that had wire from the coil coming out from underneath the pickguard.