Lennon or McCartney??

Lennon or McCartney?

  • Lennon

  • McCartney


Results are only viewable after voting.

blood5150

Member
Messages
5,642
bailey_lennon.jpg
 

JeffD

Very slow but persistent
Messages
1,573
More than the sum of their parts. Can't choose, because either choice diminishes what they did together.
 

dantedayjob

Member
Messages
1,866
McCartney... he was the most musically talented of the band, his songs tended to be more straight-forward and timeless (not always, just a generality), his voice tended to be more versatile... Lennon sometimes comes across as trying to be weird for weird's sake, and that can get a little old... I think Lennon pushed McCartney's creativity and McCartney tempered Lennon's weirdness...
 

atquinn

Silver Supporting Member
Messages
9,748
Well, with Lennon being dead and all, McCartney would clearly have the advantage in an arm wrestling match, so...

-Austin
 

Bix

Member
Messages
345
Man I just love the Beatles. I can't imagine a world where John and Paul aren't considered among the very best song writing duos. I prefer Lennon for his edginess and thought provoking songs, while I see McCartney as having a PhD in melody. It's really the perfect combination which shows in their music, just timeless.

Bix
 

Jon Silberman

10Q Jerry & Dickey
Silver Supporting Member
Messages
44,070
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

Another vote for "I'm not voting."
 

fenderball

Silver Supporting Member
Messages
3,614
i like what lennon was "about" much more than mccartney, but i think mccartney = more talented...

non voter
 

StratManKudzu

Member
Messages
1,019
I like both equally, but the catalogue for McCartney makes me choose him, if John had more time to write I'd never be able to choose, so i would assume.
 




Trending Topics

Top Bottom