Les Paul VOS - 59 or 60?

Discussion in 'Guitars in General' started by katarzis, May 17, 2006.

  1. katarzis

    katarzis Member

    Messages:
    1,251
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Location:
    Israel
    diffrance is only neck shap?
    wich one do you recomand?
     
  2. Marty s Horne

    Marty s Horne Member

    Messages:
    2,901
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2004
    Location:
    Palmetto, Florida
    I would think the main difference is a fat vs thin neck shape. I don't like thin necks so the choice for me is easy. If you're not sure, play both (even if it's not the exact model) and go with what feels best to you. Gibson has several different models of Les Pauls with 50s and 60s style neck shapes you could try out.
     
  3. Mrgearguy

    Mrgearguy Member

    Messages:
    437
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Location:
    LA, NYC, Nashville
    There was a guy in southern Illinois who made explorer/Hamer copies back in the late 70s and they looked a lot like that.

    Gearguy
     
  4. DonW

    DonW Velocity Town Angel Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    5,439
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Location:
    Ottawa but not Canada
    That would be Terry Mueller. His guitars are incredible.
     
  5. Johnnytone

    Johnnytone Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,722
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    Even though the 60 has the thinner neck, players who are not used to baseball bats will think the 60 neck carve is very comfy. It has a nice shape to it and the back is not flat like the Classics.

    That said, I'd go for the 59
     
  6. 59Vampire

    59Vampire Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    4,212
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    This is not a ituation where you should blindly buy one.You need to try them out. I have played strats and shred type thin necks for 20 years and by chance I pickued up a baseball bat 57. I ended up buying a 59 reish. Thicker than any strat i ever played or owned. I can t play skinnys anymore! The 60s profile les paul is not for me. but it may be for you. Try them and see which feels better. It really freaked me out that the big neck was comfortable because i have small hands
     
  7. lespauldude

    lespauldude Member

    Messages:
    143
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Location:
    St.Louis,Mo. USA
    Play em all. I thought I new what I liked on an LP. I played the same '73 Standard for years, until it was stolen from a studio. I now have four that have completely different necks and pick-ups, and not one of them is like my old one. And there will be more... I have my eye on two right now.
     
  8. Johnnytone

    Johnnytone Supporting Member

    Messages:
    1,722
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    Guys, he's in Israel.

    How many "Gibson Super Dealers" do you think he has access to?
     
  9. katarzis

    katarzis Member

    Messages:
    1,251
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Location:
    Israel
    you got that right...
    i'll have to go for blind...
    thanks for your answers guys!
     
  10. Marty s Horne

    Marty s Horne Member

    Messages:
    2,901
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2004
    Location:
    Palmetto, Florida
    In that case, just decide which in your experience felt better; thin necks or fat ones. By the way, I spent 3 months in Israel many years ago and had a great time. What a beautiful place; I even worked on a kibbutz for a while. Best of luck with your new Les Paul.
     
  11. Robert1950

    Robert1950 Member

    Messages:
    3,383
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Location:
    Edmonton, AB.
    I have a small hand - the 60 would be a much better choice for me.
     
  12. Marty s Horne

    Marty s Horne Member

    Messages:
    2,901
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2004
    Location:
    Palmetto, Florida
    I have small hands also but fat necks have always felt better to me.
     

Share This Page