Basement_Builder
Silver Supporting Member
- Messages
- 879
I disagree about the LS60's but there you go. I say this as a guy who owns a LOT of Late 70's (and early 80's) Gibsons as well as Tokais, to include the Tokai LS60. Imo LS60 EASILY compares to mid to late 70's Gibson. The primary difference (for example my 1980 LS60) is that the LS60 is "classic construction" and late 70's Gibson are Norlin construction. I have several MIJ that are Norlin construction as well of courze.
I could say that I prefer the SL500 to most gibsons I've owned (yamaha) and that would be true, but it's generally made of lower cost stuff and is a step down.
I guess it depends on what you really want. A laminated maple neck generally fares well over time, but single piece mahogany necks really don't.
It's not an absolute, but as a matter of overall averages. People would generally consider a built-heel laminated neck as cheap, and I don't know what the body of the SL 500 is, but it's something light (agathis?) the guitar sounds soft and a bit muttled unplugged, but plugged in, I don't see much difference.
If someone doesn't like a pancake guitar with a maple neck, though, I get it that they may not like a norlin gibson. The 76 that I had had a diminutive neck, but it felt like it was made by a human. A lot of the more recent LPs can't satisfy that statement.