SG Necks

Discussion in 'Guitars in General' started by David Robrecht, Feb 15, 2008.


  1. David Robrecht

    David Robrecht Blue Fire Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    499
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2002
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    I'm thinking of getting an SG Standard or '61 reissue. I'm a bit concerned about the 50's fat neck on the Standard. I've played the SG Classic with P-90's that was a little big, but not bad. Has anyone compared the Standard, '61 RI or the Classic? Is the Standard's neck really that big? I have the 60's neck on my LP Standard and like that just fine. Thanks.
    Dave
     
  2. XKnight

    XKnight Member

    Messages:
    11,098
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    The neck on the Classic is thicker than the neck on the Standard so you should be fine, but play it first for sure.
     
  3. Lawn Jockey

    Lawn Jockey Member

    Messages:
    5,753
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Ditto XKnight.

    I have a Standard and it is comfortable. It is bigger than the neck on your LP however.
     
  4. David Robrecht

    David Robrecht Blue Fire Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    499
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2002
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Well, that's good to hear. The Classic was full, but comfortable. If the Standard is thinner then that should be fine. I played a LP Standard a few years ago with the 50's neck and it was really fat. The SG's must just be different or Gibson changed some things recently. Thanks for the help!
    Dave
     
  5. TattooedCarrot

    TattooedCarrot Supporting Member

    Messages:
    3,472
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2003
    Location:
    SoCal
    I have recent models of the Classic, Standard, GOTW SG-3, and the GOTW 67RI. They are all based on the standard and all have the same beefy neck. I had an older Classic a few years ago that did seem a bit fatter. But right now I'd pretty much guarantee that the standard will feel the same as the classic.
     
  6. treeofpain

    treeofpain Supporting Member

    Messages:
    6,220
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Location:
    Columbia, SC
    I like fat necks, but having one on an SG seems really weird to me.
     
  7. JDW3

    JDW3 Member

    Messages:
    3,624
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Location:
    Below Flint
    I have a '07 SG Jr. It has a huge neck, like a fifties Gibson. Not sure if they were all that way. Killer tone and sustain.
     
  8. David Robrecht

    David Robrecht Blue Fire Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    499
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2002
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    I haven't played the Jr. Gibson doesn't do a very good job of describing their necks if there is a description at all. Hopefully one of my local guitar emporiums has these guitars to compare, but that's asking a lot.
    Dave
     
  9. tomr63

    tomr63 Member

    Messages:
    72
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Location:
    connecticut
    I had a SG Standard last year for a little while but sold it because I did not like the big neck. I now have an Epi Elitist 61 RI SG. The neck is thinner and much more comfortable to me than the Standard was.

    The funny thing is, I have a Les Paul Vintage Mahogany which has a pretty fat neck and I like it. For some reason the big neck on the SG just didn't feel right to me.
     
  10. Dr. Tweedbucket

    Dr. Tweedbucket Deluxe model available !!!11

    Messages:
    42,821
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Location:
    Mt. Kwakkleberry
    I know for sure the 61 reissue is a thinner neck than the Standard or the Classic. I thought the Standard and Classic had the same neck .... or the ones I played felt that way. :confused:
     
  11. David Robrecht

    David Robrecht Blue Fire Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    499
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2002
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Well, I guess I'll have to go play whatever I can find. It seems Gibson may be a little inconsistent. Thanks for all the input.
    Dave
     
  12. 8Painting

    8Painting Member

    Messages:
    2,207
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago
    With all of the SG neck talk.

    Ive always wondered why they just didnt make it a neck thru degsign
     
  13. indytruckboy

    indytruckboy Member

    Messages:
    447
    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    Supreme's have the thinest neck.
     
  14. buffbiff21

    buffbiff21 Member

    Messages:
    68
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Location:
    San Diego
    I think SG Standards have 60s slim necks.

    The only thing I worry about with SGs, especially with the 50s baseball bat necks, is the guitar being neck-heavy since the body is so small. I would recommend a 60s style slim taper neck not only because I think they play better, but also to be safe. If you like the larger necks, make sure the body is a solid heavier piece of mahogany so that the guitar doesn't feel imbalanced towards your left side when you're standing up.
     
  15. SgMaster

    SgMaster Supporting Member

    Messages:
    153
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Just like everyone else said, the Standard's neck is larger than your LP 60s slim taper, which is the same neck on the '61 Reissue SG. The classic, as far as I could remember was similar to the standard. I switched from strat to SG standard no problem.
     
  16. fatherjones.com

    fatherjones.com Member

    Messages:
    167
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2007
    I have a new SG-3 Fireburst which is basically an SG Classic -- with swamp ash body vs. mahog -- and a three pickup pickguard vs. two humbuckers.

    A weird guitar to be sure -- but sonically very, very cool. Also, I like the beefy neck. It is neck heavy, relative to the featherweight body -- but it's no problem when strapped. It's actually light as a tennis racket -- but with a fat neck -- (and really good fret work by the way.)

    Don't know what kind of blade single coils the pickups are -- but they sound killer.
     
  17. David Robrecht

    David Robrecht Blue Fire Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    499
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2002
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    I appreciate all the help. :AOK My brother just picked up a Steve Howe model ES-175. That has a bigger neck on it. I got to play it this weekend and it was very comfortable. If that's anything like the Standard's neck, I'll dig it just fine. Thanks.
    Dave
     
  18. padavis

    padavis Supporting Member

    Messages:
    2,295
    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Location:
    Indiana
    The new standards are awesome. I just got one before Christmas had to play 4, but I think I found a good one.
     
  19. David Robrecht

    David Robrecht Blue Fire Silver Supporting Member

    Messages:
    499
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2002
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    OK, I had a chance to play an SG Standard today. The neck is about the same as the Classic I played, full but not too deep. Pretty comfortable overall. I'm not sure the SG sounds that much different than my Les Paul, though. I didn't have a side to side comparison to be fair. I'm sure others will disagree. ;) So the neck is no longer a question or issue, it's whether or not I really need it and how it will compliment my other guitars. Thanks!
    Dave
     

Share This Page